USA B Recruitment - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
littlechava
United States7221 Posts
OH WAIT | ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
| ||
|
hurin
United States474 Posts
On April 14 2007 00:59 littlechava wrote: insane+failsafe = ez add =] failnoob & inane ^_^ | ||
|
Syndicate
United States47 Posts
| ||
|
Qi.TiGeR
Bangladesh78 Posts
On April 10 2007 19:39 HnR)Insane wrote: Application sent! Hope u die noob ! :D CODEEEEES !!!!!!!!! >< | ||
|
decafchicken
United States20178 Posts
i think he gets in because he already won the "who has the most support for tl.net" contest | ||
|
Ending
United States14 Posts
You say that the people applying shouldn't have a bad history or an east personality. You already have members on team USA B that have A) bad manner reputations, B) hacking past, C) east personalities. So you should probally remove these people before you ask for higher expectations from the people joining later. As far as Incontrol goes recommending people, thats complete shit. His opinion shouldn't get people into USA B. If he wants to help out National teams with advice, maybe he should do something with USA A. MoNs.aCe is not good enough for a national team, there are better of American users. If you think he's so good, add him to your national team. He will be a great addition to the team. Only people that should be on USA A are: Artosis, Crayon, G5, IdrA, Skew. Since they're the only GOOD people on there who still actually play this game actively. Nooks, Theognis, Sadist, BlackJack, Amber[LighT], NerO? Seriously, this is like a slap in the face for people who actually love the game of BW and really want to join a national team. Because how can these people who don't even play the game anymore still just sit there, them being good in the past shouldn't be a life long commitment to the National team. So basically, I think Xeris should run both USA A and USA B. He has done a half decent job fixing Huntah and Colbi's damage that they've done to the team already. I'm sure that there will be a lot of people posting, "they could come out of retirement and beat you still." That isn't likely but if you can talk them into playing a game, I'm more than happy to prove my point through a 1;1. | ||
|
Aurious
Canada1772 Posts
| ||
|
Lycaeus
United States1420 Posts
On April 14 2007 17:40 Ending wrote: Ok time for my opinion. You say that the people applying shouldn't have a bad history or an east personality. You already have members on team USA B that have A) bad manner reputations, B) hacking past, C) east personalities. So you should probally remove these people before you ask for higher expectations from the people joining later. As far as Incontrol goes recommending people, thats complete shit. His opinion shouldn't get people into USA B. If he wants to help out National teams with advice, maybe he should do something with USA A. MoNs.aCe is not good enough for a national team, there are better of American users. If you think he's so good, add him to your national team. He will be a great addition to the team. Only people that should be on USA A are: Artosis, Crayon, G5, IdrA, Skew. Since they're the only GOOD people on there who still actually play this game actively. Nooks, Theognis, Sadist, BlackJack, Amber[LighT], NerO? Seriously, this is like a slap in the face for people who actually love the game of BW and really want to join a national team. Because how can these people who don't even play the game anymore still just sit there, them being good in the past shouldn't be a life long commitment to the National team. So basically, I think Xeris should run both USA A and USA B. He has done a half decent job fixing Huntah and Colbi's damage that they've done to the team already. I'm sure that there will be a lot of people posting, "they could come out of retirement and beat you still." That isn't likely but if you can talk them into playing a game, I'm more than happy to prove my point through a 1;1. why would you 1v1 them? your opinion doesn't need to be justified by a game... | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
| ||
|
Ending
United States14 Posts
On April 14 2007 18:00 Lycaeus wrote: why would you 1v1 them? your opinion doesn't need to be justified by a game... Because I was preparing myself. You must be new to the BW community. I will almost gurantee someone would've said that, still might even. Point with incontrol is, he should worry about USA A. If he thinks Mons is good (don't know why he would think this) then he needs to recruit him into USA A. | ||
|
Ending
United States14 Posts
On April 14 2007 18:17 IdrA wrote: them still being on the roster doesnt really mean much. its not like other people would get on the team if the inactives werent there. if inc think someone deserves a spot he invites them, nothing else affects it. Them being on the roster, makes other people think they aren't as good as they really are. That they can't get on USA A but some inactives that don't even play anymore are still there. | ||
|
nullmind
1303 Posts
On April 14 2007 17:40 Ending wrote: Ok time for my opinion. You say that the people applying shouldn't have a bad history or an east personality. You already have members on team USA B that have A) bad manner reputations, B) hacking past, C) east personalities. So you should probally remove these people before you ask for higher expectations from the people joining later. As far as Incontrol goes recommending people, thats complete shit. His opinion shouldn't get people into USA B. If he wants to help out National teams with advice, maybe he should do something with USA A. MoNs.aCe is not good enough for a national team, there are better of American users. If you think he's so good, add him to your national team. He will be a great addition to the team. Only people that should be on USA A are: Artosis, Crayon, G5, IdrA, Skew. Since they're the only GOOD people on there who still actually play this game actively. Nooks, Theognis, Sadist, BlackJack, Amber[LighT], NerO? Seriously, this is like a slap in the face for people who actually love the game of BW and really want to join a national team. Because how can these people who don't even play the game anymore still just sit there, them being good in the past shouldn't be a life long commitment to the National team. So basically, I think Xeris should run both USA A and USA B. He has done a half decent job fixing Huntah and Colbi's damage that they've done to the team already. I'm sure that there will be a lot of people posting, "they could come out of retirement and beat you still." That isn't likely but if you can talk them into playing a game, I'm more than happy to prove my point through a 1;1. Very good post except the last part. I agree something should be done with USA-A first before fixing up USA-B. Whats the point of having a B team if A team is not active? If the new USA project works out, I hope USA-A takes in some of the better players of USA-B and start being more active. | ||
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
On April 14 2007 18:21 Ending wrote: Them being on the roster, makes other people think they aren't as good as they really are. That they can't get on USA A but some inactives that don't even play anymore are still there. Confused at this post, I dont play in the nationwars 90% of the time anyway because golf > bw but if you are good enough I doubt inc would turn you away, I dont see whats the big deal. | ||
|
TheSchwA
United States248 Posts
| ||
|
Ending
United States14 Posts
On April 14 2007 19:13 Sadist wrote: Confused at this post, I dont play in the nationwars 90% of the time anyway because golf > bw but if you are good enough I doubt inc would turn you away, I dont see whats the big deal. I'm just saying what everyone is thinking and wants. | ||
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
On April 14 2007 19:30 Ending wrote: I'm just saying what everyone is thinking and wants. how by "us" being on the team are we making other people feel that "they" arent as good as "they" really are? Its not like the team has a set # of slots and "we" are taking up slots that someone else could potentially have. | ||
| ||
& inane ^_^