|
Poll: i should cut my hair short
(Vote): yes
(Vote): no
hi everybody, just quickly wondering.. I have longer hair now, and i have had short hair before this for many years.. but I often think it looks boring or scraggly... but maybe that is just because I have to see it everyday... so I'm just wondering if you guys think i should cut my hair short or not
some pics of me with long hair:
+ Show Spoiler +
some old pics of me with short(er) hair:
+ Show Spoiler +
if i were to cut my hair it might look like this:
+ Show Spoiler +
anyways.. just wondering what your opinions are.. thanks for reading!!
  
|
Short hair definitely looks better on you.
|
It's an unfair question. The pictures with the shorter hair are all around better pictures. Lighting, background, pose.
Don't do it too short if you cut it. All the girls I know have been doing it... it seems to be crossing into the girls I don't know on mutual forums. =(
+1 Long hair.
|
|
|
wow, if only a haircut could make one look like claudia.
seriously though, just do what you want and what you will feel confident with. don't ask us.
|
I can't tell. Need more pics before I can decide.
|
|
|
I want to cut my hair too! wheres pano!?!
oh, and i think short looks good on you.
|
yes, short looks better, but not the example haircut you linked imo. You should go for something easier like what you had before. It takes focus away from the hair and puts it on the face instead. Personally im really no fan of pretentious "fashion-haircuts".
|
First picture is just amazing imo, go with long definitely.
|
imo ure shoulder length hair suits u
dont go for the bob cut though, that shit is overplayed
|
go with the shorter haircut, but not as short as your example. though that's just my opinion, you should go with whatever you think is best
|
shorter haircut!
and provide us with pics with your new shorter haircut after!
|
Shorter hair would be better. Less shampoo needed.
|
On April 14 2009 17:56 brjdrb wrote:
go with the shorter haircut, but not as short as your example. though that's just my opinion, you should go with whatever you think is best
this
but imo you look good with longer hair 
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
behold, your new hairdo
you can create prosthetic sideburns out of pipe cleaners glued to your face if necessary
|
short hair is for men
longer hair is for women
so I suggest u let them grow
ps: your beautifull 
|
On April 14 2009 19:06 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:behold, your new hairdo you can create prosthetic sideburns out of pipe cleaners glued to your face if necessary
lol! the adam's apple is too good
|
On April 14 2009 16:35 Friloux wrote:
thanks for reading!!
didnt read much if you know what i mean
pmed you my number
oh and longer hair suits you, you look cheap with short
|
Hair doesn't matter, just always wear those glasses <3
|
It looks good short but not like the photo you put up of how you want it. That style looks really bad to be honest. But yeah don't forget to post photos of your haircut after too.
|
zomg its a girl fapfapfap
although srsly what a stupid thread
|
definitely short, but not too short, something like you had before, it worked for you pretty well
|
Your short hair + glasses and the picture below it would make me say short hair. Though I have to agree with some other people that the quality of the pictures are totally different and it might be because of this i chose short hair.
Anyway, if you can pull off that librarian look again, then go for short hair :D
|
I think you have pretty nice hair. I'd let them long and open. My girlfriend agrees with me :p!
Also I dont think that a bob would fit you:
but I can very well imagine such a cut for you:
|
I like you better with long hair :p.
|
The short-hair pictures are better (especially the second one, very cute), but it seems a little biased, as if you are already leaning towards cutting it shorter. Anyway, based on these pictures, I think you look better with it shorter (and wear the glasses!).
|
dont cut it !!!!
i hate short hair on girls :O
(btw i also agree that the pics with short hair are better pictures all around, so thats unfair  )
Anyways, no matter how you decide: make more pics
|
I like the older pics with shorter hair much better, but hey, you should get the style you like :p
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
I think your hair is cuter when its long. But I've always liked girls with longer hair.
|
On April 14 2009 19:22 MarklarMarklar wrote:didnt read much if you know what i mean pmed you my number oh and longer hair suits you, you look cheap with short
Hahaha good luck!
PS: You look good in long or short hair so either is win, do prefer black hair over blond thou.
|
On April 14 2009 19:39 Wurzelbrumpft wrote:
zomg its a girl fapfapfap
although srsly what a stupid thread
1. your post is worse.
2. it's a blog.
|
thanks for all the opinions ^^
i'll post pics if i decide to cut it, thanks!
|
A starcraft forum you say? What an excellent place to inquire about women's hairstyles
|
|
|
United States11390 Posts
|
Calgary25969 Posts
On April 15 2009 06:13 floor exercise wrote:
A starcraft forum you say? What an excellent place to inquire about women's hairstyles
hahahaha
|
Hey guys i need some advice. figured i wouldnt make a new thread
Should I cut my hair too? When it's long, it looks like dis (girls love it)
but im thinking to cut it like dis
should i?
|
Short hair was much butter, but the hairstyle in the exampe is terribad.
|
I like the shorter hair =, but maybe its because the pictures are better
|
United States22883 Posts
On April 14 2009 19:08 ffswowsucks wrote:short hair is for men longer hair is for women so I suggest u let them grow ps: your beautifull
Smooth, playa.
|
On April 14 2009 19:08 ffswowsucks wrote:ps: your beautifull
would you say that to any of the male TLers if they made a thread like this?
im gonna hold you to it, you have to point out the beautyfullness of any TLers that post pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Birds, we are told, build their nests by instinct, while man constructs his dwelling by the exercise of reason. Birds never change, but continue to build for ever on the self-same plan; man alters and improves his houses continually. Reason advances; instinct is stationary. This doctrine is so very general that it may almost be said to be universally adopted. Men who agree on nothing else, accept this as a good explanation of the facts. Philosophers and poets, metaphysicians and divines, naturalists and the general public, not only agree in believing this to be probable, but even adopt it as a sort of axiom that is so self-evident as to need no proof, and use it as the very foundation of their speculations on instinct and reason. A belief so general, one would think, must rest on indisputable facts, and be a logical deduction from them. Yet I have come to the conclusion that not only is it very doubtful, but absolutely erroneous; that it not only deviates widely from the truth, but is in almost every particular exactly opposed to it. I believe, in short, that birds do not build their nests by instinct; that man does not construct his dwelling by reason; that birds do change and improve when affected by the same causes that make men do so; and that mankind neither alter nor improve when they exist under conditions similar to those which are almost universal among birds.
Let us first consider the theory of reason, as alone determining the domestic architecture of the human race. Man, as a reasonable animal, it is said, continually alters and improves his dwelling. This I entirely deny. As a rule, he neither alters nor improves, any more than the birds do. What have the houses of most savage tribes improved from, each as invariable as the nest of a species of bird? The tents of the Arab are the same now as they were two or three thousand years ago, and the mud villages of Egypt can scarcely have improved since the time of the Pharaohs. The palm-leaf huts and hovels of the various tribes of South America and the Malay Archipelago, what have they improved from since those regions were first inhabited? The Patagonian's rude shelter of leaves, the hollowed bank of the South African Earthmen, we cannot even conceive to have been ever inferior to what they now are. Even nearer home, the Irish turf cabin and the Highland stone shelty can hardly have advanced much during the last two thousand years. Now, no one imputes this stationary condition of domestic architecture among these savage tribes to instinct, but to simple imitation from one generation to another, and the absence of any sufficiently powerful stimulus to change or improvement. No one imagines that if an infant Arab could be transferred to Patagonia or to the Highlands, it would, when it grew up, astonish its foster-parents by constructing a tent of skins. On the other hand, it is quite clear that physical conditions, combined with the degree of civilization arrived at, almost necessitate certain types of structure. The turf, or stones, or snow--the palm-leaves, bamboo, or branches, which are the materials of houses in various countries, are used because nothing else is so readily to be obtained. The Egyptian peasant has none of these, nor even wood. What, then, can he use but mud? In tropical forest countries, the bamboo and the broad palm-leaves are the natural material for houses, and the form and mode of structure will be decided in part by the nature of the country, whether hot or cool, whether swampy or dry, whether rocky or plain, whether frequented by wild beasts, or whether subject to the attacks of enemies. When once a particular mode of building has been adopted, and has become confirmed by habit and by hereditary custom, it will be long retained, even when its utility has been lost through changed conditions, or through migration into a very different region. As a general rule, throughout the whole continent of America, native houses are built directly upon the ground--strength and security being given by thickening the low walls and the roof. In almost the whole of the Malay Islands, on the contrary, the houses are raised on posts, often to a great height, with an open bamboo floor; and the whole structure is exceedingly slight and thin. Now, what can be the reason of this remarkable difference between countries many parts of which are strikingly similar in physical conditions, natural productions, and the state of civilization of their inhabitants? We appear to have some clue to it in the supposed origin and migrations of their respective populations. The indigenes of tropical America are believed to have immigrated from the north--from a country where the winters are severe, and raised houses with open floors would be hardly habitable. They moved southwards by land along the mountain ranges and uplands, and in an altered climate continued the mode of construction of their forefathers, modified only by the new materials they met with. By minute observations of the Indians of the Amazon Valley, Mr. Bates arrived at the conclusion that they were comparatively recent immigrants from a colder climate. He says:-- "No one could live long among the Indians of the Upper Amazon without being struck with their constitutional dislike to the heat . . . Their skin is hot to the touch, and they perspire little . . . They are restless and discontented in hot, dry weather, but cheerful on cool days, when the rain is pouring down their naked backs." And, after giving many other details, he concludes, "How different all this is with the Negro, the true child of tropical climes! The impression gradually forced itself on my mind that the Red Indian lives as an immigrant or stranger in these hot regions, and that his constitution was not originally adapted, and has not since become perfectly adapted, to the climate."
The Malay races, on the other hand, are no doubt very ancient inhabitants of the hottest regions, and are particularly addicted to forming their first settlements at the mouths of rivers or creeks, or in land-locked bays and inlets. They are a pre-eminently maritime or semi-aquatic people, to whom a canoe is a necessary of life, and who will never travel by land if they can do so by water. In accordance with these tastes, they have built their houses on posts in the water, after the manner of the lake-dwellers of ancient Europe; and this mode of construction has become so confirmed, that even those tribes who have spread far into the interior, on dry plains and rocky mountains, continue to build in exactly the same manner, and find safety in the height to which they elevate their dwellings above the ground.
These general characteristics of the abode of savage man will be found to be exactly paralleled by the nests of birds. Each species uses the materials it can most readily obtain, and builds in situations most congenial to its habits. The wren, for example, frequenting hedgerows and low thickets, builds its nest generally of moss, a material always found where it lives, and among which it probably obtains much of its insect food; but it varies sometimes, using hay or feathers when these are at hand. Rooks dig in pastures and ploughed fields for grubs, and in doing so must continually encounter roots and fibres. These are used to line its nest. What more natural! The crow, feeding on carrion, dead rabbits, and lambs, and frequenting sheep-walks and warrens, chooses fur and wool to line its nest. The lark frequents cultivated fields, and makes its nest, on the ground, of grass lined with horsehair--materials the most easy to meet with, and the best adapted to its needs. The kingfisher makes its nest of the bones of the fish which it has eaten. Swallows use clay and mud from the margins of the ponds and rivers over which they find their insect food. The materials of birds' nests, like those used by savage man for his house, are, then, those which come first to hand; and it certainly requires no more special instinct to select them in the one case than in the other. But, it will be said, it is not so much the materials as the form and structure of nests, that vary so much, and are so wonderfully adapted to the wants and habits of each species; how are these to be accounted for except by instinct? I reply, they may be in a great measure explained by the general habits of the species, the nature of the tools they have to work with, and the materials they can most easily obtain, with the very simplest adaptations of means to an end quite within the mental capacities of birds. The delicacy and perfection of the nest will bear a direct relation to the size of the bird, its structure and habits. That of the wren or the humming-bird is perhaps not finer or more beautiful in proportion than that of the blackbird, the magpie, or the crow. The wren, having a slender beak, long legs, and great activity, is able with great ease to form a well-woven nest of the finest materials, and places it in thickets and hedgerows which it frequents in its search for food. The titmouse, haunting fruit-trees and walls, and searching in cracks and crannies for insects, is naturally led to build in holes where it has shelter and security; while its great activity, and the perfection of its tools (bill and feet), enable it easily to form a beautiful receptacle for its eggs and young. Pigeons, having heavy bodies, and weak feet and bills (imperfect tools for forming a delicate structure), build rude, flat nests of sticks, laid across strong branches which will bear their weight and that of their bulky young. They can do no better. The Caprimulgidæ have the most imperfect tools of all, feet that will not support them except on a flat surface (for they cannot truly perch), and a bill excessively broad, short, and weak, and almost hidden by feathers and bristles. They cannot build a nest of twigs or fibres, hair or moss, like other birds, and they therefore generally dispense with one altogether, laying their eggs on the bare ground, or on the stump or flat limb of a tree. The hooked bills, short necks and feet, and heavy bodies of parrots, render them quite incapable of building a nest like most other birds. They cannot climb up a branch without using both bill and feet; they cannot even turn round on a perch without holding on with their bill. How, then, could they inlay, or weave, or twist the materials of a nest? Consequently, they all lay in holes of trees, the tops of rotten stumps, or in deserted ants' nests, the soft materials of which they can easily hollow out.
Now I believe that throughout the whole class of birds the same general principles will be found to hold good, sometimes distinctly, sometimes more obscurely apparent, according as the habits of the species are more marked, or their structure more peculiar. It is true that, among birds differing but little in structure or habits, we see considerable diversity in the mode of nesting, but we are now so well assured that important changes of climates and of surface have occurred within the period of existing species, that it is by no means difficult to see how such differences have arisen. Habits are known to be hereditary, and as the area now occupied by each species is different from that of every other, we may be sure that such changes would act differently upon each, and would often bring together species which had acquired their peculiar habits in distinct regions and under different conditions.
But, it is objected, birds do not learn to make their nest as man does to build, for all birds will make exactly the same nest as the rest of their species, even if they have never seen one, and it is instinct alone that can enable them to do this. No doubt this would be instinct if it were true, and I simply ask for proof of the fact. This point, although so important to the question at issue, is always assumed without proof, and even against proof, for what facts there are, are opposed to it. Birds brought up from the egg in cages do not make the characteristic nest of their species, even though the proper materials are supplied them, and the experiment has never been fairly tried of turning out a pair of birds so brought up into an enclosure covered with netting, and watching the result of their untaught attempts at nest-making. With regard to the song of birds, however, which is thought to be equally instinctive, the experiment has been tried, and it is found that young birds never have the song peculiar to their species if they have not heard it, whereas they acquire very easily the song of almost any other bird with which they are brought up. It is also especially worthy of remark that they must be taken out of hearing of their parents very soon; for in the first three or four days they have already acquired a knowledge of the parent notes, which they will afterwards imitate. This shows that very young birds can both hear and remember, and it would be very extraordinary if they could live for days and weeks in a nest and know nothing of its materials and the manner of its construction. During the time they are learning to fly and return often to the nest, they must be able to examine it inside and out in every detail, and as their daily search for food invariably leads them among the materials of which it is constructed, and among places similar to that in which it is placed, is it so very wonderful that when they want one themselves they should make one like it? Again, we always assume that because a nest appears to us delicately and artfully built, that is, therefore, requires much special knowledge and acquired skill (or their substitute, instinct) in the bird who builds it. We forget that it is formed twig by twig and fibre by fibre, rudely enough at first, but crevices and irregularities, which must seem huge gaps and chasms in the little eyes of the builders, are filled up by twigs and stalks pushed in by slender beak and active foot, and that the wool, feathers, or horsehair are laid thread by thread, so that the result seems a marvel of ingenuity to us, just as would the rudest Indian hut to a native of Brobdignag.
But look at civilised man! it is said; look at Grecian and Egyptian and Roman and Gothic and modern Architecture! What advance! what improvement! what refinements! This is what reason leads to, whereas birds remain for ever stationary. If, however, such advances as these are required to prove the effects of reason as contrasted with instinct, then all savage and many half-civilized tribes have no reason, but build instinctively quite as much as birds do.
Man ranges over the whole earth, and exists under the most varied conditions, leading necessarily to equally varied habits. He migrates--he makes wars and conquests--one race mingles with another--different customs are brought into contact--the habits of a migrating race are modified by the different circumstances of a new country. The civilized race which conquered Egypt must have developed its mode of building in a forest country where timber was abundant, for there is no possibility of the idea of cylindrical columns originating in a country destitute of trees. The pyramids might have been built by an indigenous race, but not the temples of El Uksor and Karnak. In Grecian architecture, almost every characteristic feature can be traced to an origin in wooden buildings. The columns, the architrave, the frieze, the fillets, the cantelevers, the form of the roof, all point to an origin in some southern forest-clad country, and strikingly corroborate the view derived from philology, that Greece was colonised from north-western India. But to erect columns and span them with huge blocks of stone or marble is not an act of reason, but one of pure unreasoning imitation. The arch is the only true and reasonable mode of covering over wide spaces with stone, and, therefore, Grecian architecture, however exquisitely beautiful, is false in principle, and is by no means a good example of the application of reason to the art of building. And what do most of us do at the present day but imitate the buildings of those that have gone before us? We have not even been able to discover or develope any definite mode of building best suited for us. We have no characteristic national style, and to that extent are even below the birds, who have each their characteristic form of nest, exactly adapted to their wants and habits.
That excessive uniformity in the architecture of each species of bird which has been supposed to prove a nest-building instinct we may, therefore, fairly impute to the uniformity of the conditions under which each species lives. Their range is often very limited, and they very seldom permanently change their country so as to be placed in new conditions. When, however, new conditions do occur, they take advantage of them just as freely and wisely as man could do. The chimney and house-swallows are a standing proof of a change of habit since chimneys and houses were built, and in America this change has taken place within about three hundred years. Thread and worsted are now used in many nests instead of wool and horse-hair, and the jackdaw shows an affection for the church steeple which can hardly be explained by instinct. The Baltimore oriole uses all sorts of pieces of string, skeins of silk, or the gardener's bass, to weave into its fine pensile nest, instead of the single hairs and vegetable fibres it has painfully to seek in wilder regions, and Wilson believes that it improves in nest-building by practice--the older birds making the best nests. The purple martin of America takes possession of empty gourds or small boxes stuck up for its reception in almost every village and farm in America, and several of the American wrens will also build in cigar boxes, with a small hole cut in them, if placed in a suitable situation. The orchard oriole of the United States offers us an excellent example of a bird which modifies his nest according to circumstances. When it is built among firm and stiff branches it is very shallow, but when, as is often the case, it is suspended from the slender twigs of the weeping willow, it is made much deeper, so that when swayed about violently by the wind, the young may not tumble out. It has been observed also that the nests built in the warm Southern states are much slighter and more porous in texture than those in the colder regions of the north. Our own house-sparrow equally well adapts himself to circumstances. When he builds in trees, as he, no doubt, always did originally, he constructs a well-made domed nest, perfectly fitted to protect his young ones; but when he can find a convenient hole in a building or among thatch, or in any well-sheltered place, he takes much less trouble, and forms a very loosely-built nest.
A curious example of a recent change of habits has occurred in Jamaica. Previous to 1854, the palm swift (Tachornis phænicobea) inhabited exclusively the palm trees in a few districts in the island. A colony then established themselves in two cocoa nut palms in Spanish Town, and remained there till 1857, when one tree was blown down, and the other stripped of its foliage. Instead of now seeking out other palm trees, the swifts drove out the swallows who built in the Piazza of the House of Assembly, and took possession of it, building their nests on the tops of the end walls and at the angles formed by the beams and joists, a place which they continue to occupy in considerable numbers. It is remarked that here they form their nest with much less elaboration than when built in the palms, probably from being less exposed.
A fair consideration of all these facts will, I think, fully support the statement with which I commenced this article, and show that the mental faculties exhibited by birds in the construction of their nests are the same in kind as those manifested by mankind in the formation of their dwellings. These are, essentially, imitation, and a slow and partial adaptation to new conditions. To compare the work of birds with the highest manifestations of human art and science is totally beside the question. I do not maintain that birds are gifted with reasoning faculties at all approaching in variety and extent to those of man. I simply hold that the phenomena presented by their mode of building their nests, when fairly compared with those exhibited by the great mass of mankind in building their houses, indicate no essential difference in the kind or nature of the mental faculties employed. If instinct means anything, it means the capacity to perform some complex act without teaching or experience. It implies innate ideas of a very definite kind, and, if established, would overthrow Mr. Mill's sensationalism and all the modern philosophy of experience. That the existence of true instinct may be established in other ways is not improbable, but in the particular case of birds' nests, which is usually considered one of its strongholds, I cannot find a particle of evidence to show the existence of anything beyond those lower reasoning powers which animals are universally admitted to possess.
|
THERE ARE NO GIRLS ON THE INTERNET
|
u gotta skate8152 Posts
Deffinately shorter if you ask me! You're really pretty btw. (if that is you that is :p)
|
On April 15 2009 06:34 YPang wrote:
This if possible lol.
|
is awesome32269 Posts
|
Netherlands4511 Posts
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc?
|
Ret's just jealous he can't make a good hair thread.
|
You look nice in the pictures with short hair. The pictures with long hair aren't so flattering. Then again, it may be due to other things (like lighting, make-up, pose, etc). In fact, I'd say it's mostly due to that.
However, doesn't that also say something? If you post unflattering pictures of yourself with long hair and flattering pictures of yourself with short hair, then doesn't that mean that you preferred short hair to begin with?
|
On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc?
Are you trying to stop her?
No need to be a jerk.
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
everyone knows you wait until 25 posts before posting pictures of yourself... 1k if you are a guy.
Insane how many people don't know that -.-
|
On April 15 2009 08:09 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
everyone knows you wait until 25 posts before posting pictures of yourself... 1k if you are a guy.
Insane how many people don't know that -.-
quick, someone add this to the commandments
|
It should be added to the commandments!
11) Thou shalt not camwhore prematurely.
EDIT: Sunhay beat me to it 
|
i came in this thread to say hi
then i see fakesteve's post + goku ;_;
|
Your hair is too thin, i recommend complete shave to grow it back hard and sexy.
|
The middle pics were the best imo. The ones where your hair was not super long or short.
|
i suggest you get a mohawk... That'll give you more attention than posting your pic on TL.
|
Braavos36373 Posts
On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk.
You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL
|
|
|
On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL
loliodshgdofiugfg hngfhhgjhjk
|
Pictures in middle are best, go for that I guess, though I'm not much of an expert.
|
u gotta skate8152 Posts
On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL
WOW :D
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
|
|
|
the truth shall prevail!!
|
|
|
|
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
Actually i did some internet matlockery and i think the zialarm was pulled in error. Legit imo
|
I think the person is the person.
The links on the image trace to an art website and on the art website there is a special page called TLblog that only the creator of the website could have made...and on the resume it has a girl's name.
Unless of course, the whole website is a fabrication, which I simply think is not likelY.
|
Both look good, just go short for a change and it will grow back in a little while anyway :3
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
yeah. Also yes cut hair shorter, also darker like umm 2nd? picture down, yeah darker suits you more.
|
|
|
|
|
On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL
She is my girlfriend.
Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc!
I've been working at this a long time xD
|
On April 15 2009 09:37 Kennigit wrote:lol edit: oops whatevs
aahhaha owned. so thats how the user page looks for admins =0.
|
Are you from georgia and were you talking on omegle last night, because I had this exact conversation with someone.
Anyway, you look stunning with short hair. Go with it.
|
|
|
so looks like short hair ftw^^ now i gotta go get some sharp scissors and some curlers so i can look like audrey tautou
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
|
Your facial structure definitely calls for the short-medium hair. Don't take it personally, but I'm going to be a little critical.
What stands out about your face is that you have a little bit of a square jaw, a medium+ size forehead, and strong cheek bones. Long, straight hair (similar to what you have now), particularly emphasizes these points as it creates the contrast. Ideally you would probably want short-medium length hair with waves or curls in it to take away from the square jaw. Thickness wise, definitely don't go with the hair cut that you want in the first pic because the hair is way too straight and thick for your face. The thickness will take away from your strong cheekbones and the straightness will emphasis the square jaw. I'd say go with some sort of off center bangs as well that will flow down a little bit to cover a bit of your forhead. The off center look will also very nicely round out other parts of your facial structure. In the pictures of you with shorter hair, and the majority of the people complimenting, this is exactly the type of hair cut you have. Off center split, not too think, short-medium length, and just a little bit of hair flowing over your forehead. The look is very good on you.
|
On April 15 2009 11:47 gchan wrote:
Your facial structure definitely calls for the short-medium hair. Don't take it personally, but I'm going to be a little critical.
What stands out about your face is that you have a little bit of a square jaw, a medium+ size forehead, and strong cheek bones. Long, straight hair (similar to what you have now), particularly emphasizes these points as it creates the contrast. Ideally you would probably want short-medium length hair with waves or curls in it to take away from the square jaw. Thickness wise, definitely don't go with the hair cut that you want in the first pic because the hair is way too straight and thick for your face. The thickness will take away from your strong cheekbones and the straightness will emphasis the square jaw. I'd say go with some sort of off center bangs as well that will flow down a little bit to cover a bit of your forhead. The off center look will also very nicely round out other parts of your facial structure. In the pictures of you with shorter hair, and the majority of the people complimenting, this is exactly the type of hair cut you have. Off center split, not too think, short-medium length, and just a little bit of hair flowing over your forehead. The look is very good on you.
epic troll or serious? i cant tell
|
United States22883 Posts
On April 15 2009 11:47 gchan wrote:
Your facial structure definitely calls for the short-medium hair. Don't take it personally, but I'm going to be a little critical.
What stands out about your face is that you have a little bit of a square jaw, a medium+ size forehead, and strong cheek bones. Long, straight hair (similar to what you have now), particularly emphasizes these points as it creates the contrast. Ideally you would probably want short-medium length hair with waves or curls in it to take away from the square jaw. Thickness wise, definitely don't go with the hair cut that you want in the first pic because the hair is way too straight and thick for your face. The thickness will take away from your strong cheekbones and the straightness will emphasis the square jaw. I'd say go with some sort of off center bangs as well that will flow down a little bit to cover a bit of your forhead. The off center look will also very nicely round out other parts of your facial structure. In the pictures of you with shorter hair, and the majority of the people complimenting, this is exactly the type of hair cut you have. Off center split, not too think, short-medium length, and just a little bit of hair flowing over your forehead. The look is very good on you.
ECONOMIST HAIR DRESSER??
|
haha, epic post gchan.
o, yea, short/medium length def. looks better.
|
Braavos36373 Posts
On April 15 2009 10:50 Zortch wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL She is my girlfriend. Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc! I've been working at this a long time xD
On April 15 2009 11:28 Friloux wrote:
*Picture*
it's not weird to share the same IP address, it just means you posted on a computer of his or he did on one of yours. you have to understand TL is ridiculously skeptical when it comes to females unless they've met them at some sort of event, because the most "famous" one in TL history turned out to be a guy, and roughly 75% of the userbase was in love with her. shocking, i know.
ps i vote short hair.
|
|
|
On April 15 2009 12:38 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 10:50 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL She is my girlfriend. Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc! I've been working at this a long time xD it's not weird to share the same IP address, it just means you posted on a computer of his or he did on one of yours. you have to understand TL is ridiculously skeptical when it comes to females unless they've met them at some sort of event, because the most "famous" one in TL history turned out to be a guy, and roughly 75% of the userbase was in love with her. shocking, i know. ps i vote short hair.
Him, hotbid....in love with him lol. Yeah it was basicly the crying game internet style. type zia the true story into the search if your interested in seeing why everyone around here needs a hand writen note before they will believe you dont have a penis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
do you see a fuckin towel rack
which room of your house has a fuckin towel rack
|
friloux, girls can't post pics of themselves if they are taken ok
TL RULE #32
|
Braavos36373 Posts
On April 15 2009 12:56 InToTheWannaB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 12:38 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 10:50 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL She is my girlfriend. Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc! I've been working at this a long time xD On April 15 2009 11:28 Friloux wrote:
*Picture* it's not weird to share the same IP address, it just means you posted on a computer of his or he did on one of yours. you have to understand TL is ridiculously skeptical when it comes to females unless they've met them at some sort of event, because the most "famous" one in TL history turned out to be a guy, and roughly 75% of the userbase was in love with her. shocking, i know. ps i vote short hair. Him, hotbid....in love with him lol. Yeah it was basicly the crying game internet style. type zia the true story into the search if your interested in seeing why everyone around here needs a hand writen note before they will believe you dont have a penis.
No... they were in love with her, not him...
|
|
|
United States11637 Posts
|
nice one yo you really called her on that one
|
|
|
On April 15 2009 14:21 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 12:56 InToTheWannaB wrote:On April 15 2009 12:38 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 10:50 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL She is my girlfriend. Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc! I've been working at this a long time xD On April 15 2009 11:28 Friloux wrote:
*Picture* it's not weird to share the same IP address, it just means you posted on a computer of his or he did on one of yours. you have to understand TL is ridiculously skeptical when it comes to females unless they've met them at some sort of event, because the most "famous" one in TL history turned out to be a guy, and roughly 75% of the userbase was in love with her. shocking, i know. ps i vote short hair. Him, hotbid....in love with him lol. Yeah it was basicly the crying game internet style. type zia the true story into the search if your interested in seeing why everyone around here needs a hand writen note before they will believe you dont have a penis. No... they were in love with her, not him... Well they loved "her" but it was really a him... but I guess it was the "her" they really love...uhhh my head hurts
|
On April 15 2009 15:20 InToTheWannaB wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 14:21 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 12:56 InToTheWannaB wrote:On April 15 2009 12:38 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 10:50 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 09:20 Hot_Bid wrote:On April 15 2009 08:06 Zortch wrote:On April 15 2009 07:57 ret wrote:
9 posts and already busting out the pics?
attention whore much? T.T
do you even play sc? Are you trying to stop her? No need to be a jerk. You and "her" are roommates or something? Because you guys share IP address. LOL She is my girlfriend. Hence why I don't want ret to make her stop playing sc! I've been working at this a long time xD On April 15 2009 11:28 Friloux wrote:
*Picture* it's not weird to share the same IP address, it just means you posted on a computer of his or he did on one of yours. you have to understand TL is ridiculously skeptical when it comes to females unless they've met them at some sort of event, because the most "famous" one in TL history turned out to be a guy, and roughly 75% of the userbase was in love with her. shocking, i know. ps i vote short hair. Him, hotbid....in love with him lol. Yeah it was basicly the crying game internet style. type zia the true story into the search if your interested in seeing why everyone around here needs a hand writen note before they will believe you dont have a penis. No... they were in love with her, not him... Well they loved "her" but it was really a him... but I guess it was the "her" they really love...uhhh my head hurts
They loved the internet.
|
Korea (South)11570 Posts
On April 15 2009 13:12 Pengu1n wrote:
you can move the camera from one place to another?
edit, the hair color is entirely different. why the hell do girls dye their hairs?
|
its just that one pic is in a mirror and one is not..... also same hair, just different lighting.
|
On April 15 2009 15:37 CaucasianAsian wrote:you can move the camera from one place to another? edit, the hair color is entirely different. why the hell do girls dye their hairs?
the eyebrows are even different...has technology advanced?
When I first saw the pictures I said definitely long hair. after reading the responses I got confused and ended up not voting
|
hahaha pengu1n you dumb brah
also glasses and short hair, easily
|
well the short hair pictures are older pictures, hair doesnt grow very fast
|
On April 15 2009 13:22 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
do you see a fuckin towel rack
which room of your house has a fuckin towel rack ahahahaha
|
Is it me or does the OP kinda look like the character Red Cap from the TV Show The Unit?
|
Is it very uncommon for girls in north america to hang out on the internet in general? Because every time I see someone present themselves as a girl north americans in particular are extremely sceptical.
Personally I know enough girls irl that play games that I am not very surprised if I see one on the internet (maybe I should be)
|
bit too skinny, skin seems a little dry 'n eyes seem kinda dull... I fold..
You look best @ pic #1 and #4 of the short haired series.. maybe it's the make up though.
last pic of of short haired series is the worst..
ps. attention whoring is kinda lame.. we don't need girls anyways, we got Geoff!
|
oh man this thread was going epic before she post a letter proving herself.
|
United States22883 Posts
On April 15 2009 13:22 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
do you see a fuckin towel rack
which room of your house has a fuckin towel rack
Right next to my computer
|
/Swoon.
lets be blatantly honest, thats why you posted the pics.
|
|
|
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
|
On April 15 2009 21:21 Jibba wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2009 13:22 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
do you see a fuckin towel rack
which room of your house has a fuckin towel rack Right next to my computer
OMG LOL!
You look very attractive with short hair and glasses. I prefer girls that have long hair just for the fact they can do some wicked ass hair do with it.
|
so out of curosity how did the mole below your nose go from one side of your face to the other in the first set of pictures to the second set?
|
Do whatever you perfer. Just please, for the love of everything that is holy, do not dye your hair. I really do not understand this obsession some people have with changing their hair colour, particularly to blond. Most of the time, they looked far better with their natural hair colour and you do not seem to be the exception.
I usually perfer longer hair. However, from the pictures you provided, you looked better with slightly shorter hair. Shoulder length would be my suggestion.
Of course, in the end, do whatever you perfer. This is just my take on it.
|
anyways, im not really sure why im an attention whore.. if i ask about getting my hair cut.. shouldnt you first know what my hair looks like? :S
|
Because you're asking a site full of people who mostly don't even talk to girls, if not at least very awkwardly. Look at the number of replies to this blog... You're not even a regular member here, with 15ish posts, probably most of them from this thread.
If you posted it on a board with more normal people, you'd get maybe 4 replies and it would die because no one cares. Going to the nerds is obviously a plea for attention.
|
people post random advice columns all the time in tl blogs... it just happens to be my first one
|
People on TL generally also post about StarCraft.
|
yes, but this is a blog, not in the starcraft section
|
LOL. Yea the blogs as of late have been very very random shit.
|
On April 15 2009 20:35 haduken wrote:
oh man this thread was going epic before she post a letter proving herself.
it was epic because it was the mods who were jumping the gun.
|
On April 16 2009 01:55 Friloux wrote:
hahaha
|
Braavos36373 Posts
i think the attention and skepticism largely comes from the title of the blog. I mean come on, "Pictures of a girl (who may or may not be me)"??
|
i didnt title it that, the mods changed it... it was originally called "haircut..." >>
|
Want to go out with me?
Oh wait.. You're Canadian.
Edit: ahaha look how many views and replies this topic has already xD
|
Braavos36373 Posts
On April 16 2009 03:31 Friloux wrote:
i didnt title it that, the mods changed it... it was originally called "haircut..." >>
ohhhhhh that explains a lot
hahahaha
|
i think girls with glasses are really cute, you should wear glasses all the time
|
brilliant detective work done here.
edit: I think shoulder length hair would work the best imo.
|
CA10824 Posts
On April 16 2009 03:59 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 16 2009 03:31 Friloux wrote:
i didnt title it that, the mods changed it... it was originally called "haircut..." >> ohhhhhh that explains a lot hahahaha
lol
|
Braavos36373 Posts
i was thinking how could someone possibly create a thread titled "pics of a girl who may or may not be me" and expect anything but witch-hunting flames
|
United States11390 Posts
On April 16 2009 04:11 Hot_Bid wrote:
i was thinking how could someone possibly create a thread titled "pics of a girl who may or may not be me" and expect anything but witch-hunting flames
chill'd
|
On April 16 2009 02:02 Chef wrote:
Because you're asking a site full of people who mostly don't even talk to girls, if not at least very awkwardly. Look at the number of replies to this blog... You're not even a regular member here, with 15ish posts, probably most of them from this thread.
If you posted it on a board with more normal people, you'd get maybe 4 replies and it would die because no one cares. Going to the nerds is obviously a plea for attention.
It's not a big deal. It's a better blog than most that I've read. She got some decent opinions (I say go with shorter) and advice. The thread was entertaining for us and partly useful for her.
|
On April 14 2009 16:42 404.Delirium wrote:
It's an unfair question. The pictures with the shorter hair are all around better pictures. Lighting, background, pose.
Don't do it too short if you cut it. All the girls I know have been doing it... it seems to be crossing into the girls I don't know on mutual forums. =(
+1 Long hair.
mmm agreed
but i say go w/ the short hair that's the trend atm... well at least it is amongst krns
On April 16 2009 03:59 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 16 2009 03:31 Friloux wrote:
i didnt title it that, the mods changed it... it was originally called "haircut..." >> ohhhhhh that explains a lot hahahaha
read this and i lol'd so hard that i choked on my own saliva...
*cough* *cough*
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
On April 15 2009 13:22 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
do you see a fuckin towel rack
which room of your house has a fuckin towel rack
God I laughed way too hard at this.
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On April 15 2009 19:11 Smorrie wrote:
bit too skinny, skin seems a little dry 'n eyes seem kinda dull... I fold..
You look best @ pic #1 and #4 of the short haired series.. maybe it's the make up though.
last pic of of short haired series is the worst..
ps. attention whoring is kinda lame.. we don't need girls anyways, we got Geoff!
LOL
|
Im curious how the daily blog views changed on this after the topic title was changed.
I read this thread when it was first labelled haircut, didnt have a very odd number of views to repies ratio or anything. However when the title changed, there was a huge surge of views.
Would you mind doing a little copy paste of the blog views per day log Friloux? (you can see if you click the blogs button at the top of the page and then clicking on my blog)
|
On April 16 2009 19:02 Fen wrote:
Im curious how the daily blog views changed on this after the topic title was changed.
I read this thread when it was first labelled haircut, didnt have a very odd number of views to repies ratio or anything. However when the title changed, there was a huge surge of views.
Would you mind doing a little copy paste of the blog views per day log Friloux? (you can see if you click the blogs button at the top of the page and then clicking on my blog)
So true lol, at first it got no more attention than what threads on fashion generally get here (quite little) then when chill trolled the title everything just exploded Only to completely die when hotbid changed it back again ~~
|
On April 16 2009 19:02 Fen wrote:
Would you mind doing a little copy paste of the blog views per day log Friloux? (you can see if you click the blogs button at the top of the page and then clicking on my blog)
lets see...
say.. views 4608.. then
2009-4-17 1
2009-4-16 6
2009-4-15 7
2009-4-14 15
?
|
The mid-length looked good...just around shoulder length.
Your photo when you had longer hair was an inferior photo, though, so it's not really a good basis for comparison.
|
well, against my better judgement, its short now. short short. turns out if you cut off a ft of your hair you can donate it to make a wig for underpriveledged cancer kids. so, even if it doesnt look great, its worth it.
edit:
|
+ Show Spoiler [image] +Oh god, it's back. I think it's looking at me. Maybe I can fend it off with the towel rack. Run for your lives.
|
|
|
and you look gorgeous
the haircut looks verry nice
|
On April 17 2009 11:24 CDRdude wrote:+ Show Spoiler [image] +Oh god, it's back. I think it's looking at me. Maybe I can fend it off with the towel rack. Run for your lives.
The towel rack can no longer save you, make a break for it!
|
On April 17 2009 12:21 BuGzlToOnl wrote:
Two thumbs up. Looks great.
|
fuck. short hair on girls = fail
this topic is done for me.....i had hopes.....
|
|
|
It looks waaay better now! =)
|
Netherlands6142 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_8576.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_8579.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_3587.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_4443.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/Me-10.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/scan2.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/Stag.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/claudiaMTX2003_468x774.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://friloux-art.com/TLblog/audrey-tautou-041808-080976.jpg)
![[image loading]](/staff/FakeSteveTPR/thenewdo.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://theglamourouslife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/vb.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.hairstyletwist.com/blog/uploads/Image/iStock_000004320051XSmall.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://www.meetyourmakers.com/gfx/testie2.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.mymym.com/gfx/players/BCI_Idra.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/3366/gokussj3rn6.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Kennigit/Untitled2.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_8597.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/7465/wtfooe.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.tvverdict.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nicole_hat.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.friloux-art.com/TLblog/picture.JPG)
![[image loading]](http://www.friloux-art.com/TLblog/100_8739b.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://canvaspaint.org/9acb.png)
