|
|
|
That would be most unfortunate to be the one person on the ground killed by it.
|
United States22883 Posts
|
On February 13 2009 15:46 Divinek wrote:
That would be most unfortunate to be the one person on the ground killed by it.
Just wondering what that guy was thinking as he saw it coming towards him ;\
|
On February 13 2009 15:51 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2009 15:46 Divinek wrote:
That would be most unfortunate to be the one person on the ground killed by it. Just wondering what that guy was thinking as he saw it coming towards him ;\
id guess something along the lines of "wtf no way"
|
planes crash everywhere, everyday. only 1 in 1000 gets reported in the news.
dont quote me on that
|
On February 13 2009 16:00 x89titan wrote:
planes crash everywhere, everyday. only 1 in 1000 gets reported in the news.
dont quote me on that
Is this stated somewhere?
*goes and looks*
|
The daughter of Capt. Sullenberger actually goes to my school. You do know that that plane crash was not the pilot's fault, right? I doubt anything is going on with "pilots these days." It was the scourge birds.
|
United States22883 Posts
On February 13 2009 16:00 x89titan wrote:
planes crash everywhere, everyday. only 1 in 1000 gets reported in the news.
dont quote me on that
|
Only a very very small percentage of commercial aviation accidents are due to pilot error. It's almost always caused by mechanical malfunction, usually due to crappy maintenance.
|
On February 13 2009 15:51 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2009 15:46 Divinek wrote:
That would be most unfortunate to be the one person on the ground killed by it. Just wondering what that guy was thinking as he saw it coming towards him ;\
couldve been a guy inside the house it hit
|
|
|
Korea (South)11601 Posts
families and friends of the 3 pilots, 1 non-rever of Colgan, and 45 passengers all have my prayers.
Summary of ATC tapes edited from 31 minutes to 4 minutes of relevant stuff.
http://www.supload.com/listen?s=8QeAxT
Edit: If you don't understand: Colgan 3407 is the plane that crashed in the audio
Edit 2: The female 
|
Korea (South)11601 Posts
On February 13 2009 16:08 BanZu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2009 16:00 x89titan wrote:
planes crash everywhere, everyday. only 1 in 1000 gets reported in the news.
dont quote me on that Is this stated somewhere? *goes and looks*
most of the planes that do crash, are not corporate airliners, nor do they crash in highly populated areas, and they crash safely. I.E. safe landings not making it on the landing strip, or single engine planes, private jets, etc...
|
Yeah this was actually pretty fucking close to me (I live in buffalo ny). My dad is flying out in about 3 hours too. Scary o.o
|
On February 13 2009 15:56 travis wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2009 15:51 ShoCkeyy wrote:On February 13 2009 15:46 Divinek wrote:
That would be most unfortunate to be the one person on the ground killed by it. Just wondering what that guy was thinking as he saw it coming towards him ;\ id guess something along the lines of "wtf no way"
"This is it - GG"
|
my dad calls me gay when I tell him im nervous when we are on a plane... this shit happens all the time.. could be u
|
49 ppl died.
there we 44 people on and a crew of 4....
unless one person snuck on. which made the plane overweight and caused it to crash
|
Korea (South)11601 Posts
3 crew members, 1 non-rever, 45 passengers.
|
|
|
It's the opposite of a "rever", obviously.
|
United States24801 Posts
Planes always crash.
Cars always crash.
No surprises.
Condolences to the passengers and crew.
|
Unfortunate, but planes are still by far the safest form of travel.
|
Worst timing for the plane crash. Now all that joy about "amazing pilots" just disappears. Prayers to the families.
|
On February 13 2009 17:35 [Fin]Vittu wrote:
49 ppl died.
there we 44 people on and a crew of 4....
unless one person snuck on. which made the plane overweight and caused it to crash It killed one person on the ground, which brings it up to 49.
|
On February 13 2009 20:34 Draconizard wrote:
It's the opposite of a "rever", obviously.
revers - a lapel on a woman's garment; turned back to show the reverse side
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Dehav.dash8.750pix.jpg/300px-Dehav.dash8.750pix.jpg)
