Who is this? - Page 2

On February 10 2009 14:45 Osmoses wrote:
Me being hilarious aside, yeah, she does seriously look under 10 to me, and up until girls start growing sex appeal on their chests, I'm more inclined to call them "cute" than "attractive".

On February 10 2009 13:19 Manifesto7 wrote:


I'm more worried about the guy that replied in two minutes with a picture date and birthdate of the girl essentially at his fingertips (or palm).

On February 10 2009 14:45 Osmoses wrote:
Oh my word, Travis, you can't admit a girl below the age of 18 is attractive! Just because humans hit puberty at around 12 doesn't mean we are allowed to find them attractive until another 5 years! It's indecent!

On February 10 2009 14:58 OmgIRok wrote:


It's just unmoral? Guys back in the 15th century used to be fathers of 5+ kids at like 16 years of age?

We hit puberty around 12 cause we were meant to have sex at that age. But because of science our life span gets around +40 more years and so the ratio of 12(puberty&sex) to 40(death) is the equivalent of 24(sex&possibly puberty) to 80 (death). Give or take a few

I totally agree with Travis

On February 10 2009 13:55 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
this is a creepy fucking thread.. did you just say "fuller lips" [than your cousin] ?

On February 10 2009 16:58 boesthius wrote:
she looks EXACTLY like my cousin

except my cousin has bigger breasts

On February 10 2009 16:43 PH wrote:

-_____-;;

So sensitive, geez. Yes, the girl in the picture reminds me of my cousin, though has some differing facial features, and I pointed them out. "Fuller lips" happen to be one of the differences. And yes, I do think that the girl in the picture is pretty, and more so than my cousin.

Got a problem with that?

On February 10 2009 17:20 {88}iNcontroL wrote:


Do I have a problem with you describing your cousins lips and rating her attractiveness versus another girl of 16? Sure. But I don't think it is MY problem you should concern yourself with.