EPTHow to pick a husband if you want kids - Page 5
| Blogs > Shady Sands |
|
Sporadic44
United States533 Posts
| ||
|
BrTarolg
United Kingdom3574 Posts
Even if you have proof of her actions? | ||
|
Dapper_Cad
United Kingdom964 Posts
Try not abandoning your responsibility for birth control. Wear a condom or get a vasectomy. On January 14 2013 06:27 Shady Sands wrote: ^^ hilarious username for this thread It's a hilarious username for existence. | ||
|
Zealos
United Kingdom3575 Posts
Bravo btw Shady, another great blog | ||
|
Sejanus
Lithuania550 Posts
I mean there are people outside who kill other people, rob, rape, do 6546534 other bad things, if I got mad at every single one of them, I'd be insane by now. It's actually pretty cool she share's her methods, those with brains can learn a thing or two helpful to recognize bitches like her. So that after the first night we can end it with a promise to call. | ||
|
Sejanus
Lithuania550 Posts
On January 15 2013 00:35 BrTarolg wrote: if you ever get a GF who secretly tries to get pregnant against your will without you knowing about it, what can you do? Even if you have proof of her actions? You can obviously dump her if it's not too late. Otherwise, well, you are probably screwed. In some areas women have too many rights and men not enough. Yeah well you can always wear a condom despite what she says, but when she figures you are not trusting her, relationship is likely over. May be for the good if she was a bitch, may be for the bad if she was nice and genuine girl and didn't lie about pills. | ||
|
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On January 15 2013 02:31 Sejanus wrote: In some areas women have too many rights and men not enough. Where in the world, in history, has this ever been true? | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On January 15 2013 02:15 Zealos wrote: I assumed this was a counter argument. Am I the only one seeing this? Showing the flaws in the authors argument? Bravo btw Shady, another great blog Yep, the blog was meant to be quasi-satirical--of both sides of the argument. | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
Because you are generalizing your individual life experience to the whole of mankind in a sweeping manner and that's what you do when you're young. If you're older, you should know better. I just want to know where you're at so I have some context to your writing. Similar to knowing that Vonnegut survived Dresden or that Hunter S. Thompson did a shit ton of drugs. Your writing is decent stylistically (although it has a lot of youthful flair to it, too--like, you know where to put the insight in your writing but your insight itself is a little weak, so you cover it with style and it fools people) but your topic matter is very... well, bitter. So, again, how old are you? | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
Also, the language which you use in your writing is very cocky and condescending ("kiddo"). It makes us really wonder how old you are to be telling us how life is when I think many of us may actually be older and have more life experience than you. If you could pull back on the flair and replace it with more of a "in my experience" type of style then you'd have a lot less of these types of questions--but if you did that, what would you have in the piece? There would be nothing there worth saying. As it stands, this piece is pure style and no substance. (If you're gonna be a writer, you're gonna get your writing torn apart by other people. Don't get me wrong; I wish you well in life and I hope you succeed in all of your endeavors. This is part of the tempering process if you're going to be a writer worth anything  .) | ||
|
lisward
Singapore959 Posts
| ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On January 15 2013 14:52 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: Because you are generalizing your individual life experience to the whole of mankind in a sweeping manner and that's what you do when you're young. If you're older, you should know better. I just want to know where you're at so I have some context to your writing. Similar to knowing that Vonnegut survived Dresden or that Hunter S. Thompson did a shit ton of drugs. Your writing is decent stylistically (although it has a lot of youthful flair to it, too--like, you know where to put the insight in your writing but your insight itself is a little weak, so you cover it with style and it fools people) but your topic matter is very... well, bitter. So, again, how old are you? I'm twenty-four. I feel a little old to be asked my age, is all. | ||
|
ktimekiller
United States690 Posts
On January 15 2013 08:43 Crownlol wrote: Where in the world, in history, has this ever been true? What world do YOU live in? Family law is HEAVILY skewed in favor of women. Unfairly so | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On January 15 2013 16:08 ktimekiller wrote: What world do YOU live in? Family law is HEAVILY skewed in favor of women. Unfairly so Completely depends on the state and nation you live in. Northern and Western Europe-->tilted towards the woman. East/west coasts of America? towards the woman. Texas + US south? Tilted towards the man. Midwest? Neutral. Asia-Pacific? Towards the man. India and Arab states? Heavily towards the man. | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
| ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On January 15 2013 17:39 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: How can you say that anywhere in the US laws are tilted towards women LOL Paternity laws (e.g. is the kid still legally yours even after you find out she got pregnant by someone else?), asset forfeiture calculations (e.g. do you chop up the assets 50/50, or do you divide it by pre-marital proportions?), validity of pre-nuptial agreements (are they automatically invalid), 'welfare of the child' -- is that the paramount concern of the family court (usually indicates a more generous asset split to the parent which gets the child), custody rules -- how friendly are they to the parent which doesn't get permanent custody, etc. | ||
|
dongmydrum
United States139 Posts
On January 15 2013 14:52 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: Because you are generalizing your individual life experience to the whole of mankind in a sweeping manner and that's what you do when you're young. If you're older, you should know better. I just want to know where you're at so I have some context to your writing. Similar to knowing that Vonnegut survived Dresden or that Hunter S. Thompson did a shit ton of drugs. Your writing is decent stylistically (although it has a lot of youthful flair to it, too--like, you know where to put the insight in your writing but your insight itself is a little weak, so you cover it with style and it fools people) but your topic matter is very... well, bitter. So, again, how old are you? This reminds me of a quote by Stephen Colbert. "Remember, you cannot be both young and wise. Young people who pretend to be wise to the ways of the world are mostly just cynics" | ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On January 15 2013 17:56 Shady Sands wrote: Paternity laws (e.g. is the kid still legally yours even after you find out she got pregnant by someone else?), asset forfeiture calculations (e.g. do you chop up the assets 50/50, or do you divide it by pre-marital proportions?), validity of pre-nuptial agreements (are they automatically invalid), 'welfare of the child' -- is that the paramount concern of the family court (usually indicates a more generous asset split to the parent which gets the child), custody rules -- how friendly are they to the parent which doesn't get permanent custody, etc. That is one section of the law which is slated towards women. Basically every other part is slated towards men. | ||
| ||
