EPTIGN finally gives its verdict on StarCraft 2 - Page 3
| Blogs > supernova |
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11075 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
That's one of the reasons I like reviewers like Yahtzee although he's a bit too negative. | ||
|
Kim_Hyun_Han
706 Posts
so they couldnt give it a 10/10 but hey friend you cant spell IGNORANCE without spelling IGN | ||
|
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
On www.xfire.com you can see that people still play more mw1 then mw2. You can even see that people play more sc2 then mw2 and on some days even more then mw1. I know, not everyone has xfire on when they play mw1 or 2, but you can say the same about sc2 players. | ||
|
Goshawk.
United Kingdom5338 Posts
On August 04 2010 14:24 Alou wrote: You haven't bought the game, yet your opinion is supposed to be more informed than IGN's? That's ridiculous. You admit the game has faults, but you still give it a perfect score? I love SC2 and will continue to play it because it's great, but crying about a 9 when that is a perfectly reasonable score for the game is ridiculous. Your entire post is laughable. I was gonna point this out, but Alou did it for me. On August 04 2010 19:15 Dente wrote: COD 1 was awesome, COD 2 was easier but still awesome and COD4 mw1 en 2 are just shit and too easy to play. On www.xfire.com you can see that people still play more mw1 then mw2. You can even see that people play more sc2 then mw2 and on some days even more then mw1. I know, not everyone has xfire on when they play mw1 or 2, but you can say the same about sc2 players. Using Xfire to compare amount of players is horrible, not only does it not tell you how many people are playing the game it just tells you how much the people with Xfire play the game. Most people playing MW2 use Steam and probably don't bother with Xfire. | ||
|
Xyik
Canada728 Posts
I for one, feel cheated. They showed us all the cinematics in trailers / teasers already. The campaign missions while lots of fun, could have had more depth. I feel cheated that I played 95% of the missions as terran. So while all in all single player was fun, it really could have been better. Compare Warcraft 3's cinematics after each race's campaign and tell me which was more impressive. The script could have been better. In-game unit sounds could have been better. By saying the game is 10/10 you're saying that these aren't issues. Honsetly Starcraft 2 is a great game, I would rate is high, an 8 or 9 maybe, but 10? It's not that close to being perfect I'm afraid. | ||
|
mOnion
United States5657 Posts
starcraft campaign 6 or 7/10 IGN isn't TL, they have to take the whole thing into consideration. I'm surprised they rated it that high in the first place. | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
| ||
|
anon195
15 Posts
CALL OF DUTY AND ALL FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS besides Halo S-U-C-K no. halo is worse quake is what fps is about | ||
|
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
On August 05 2010 00:27 iCCup.Diamond wrote: IGN is also the people that said that the Terran Thor is unstoppable and they did not see a reason for any Terran player to EVER build any unit besides it.... LOL yeah take gaming sites with a grain of salt. they don't know what they're talking about, they make up detailed and long replies about how the game has a great story which noone gives a shit about. i remember gamespot fired a guy because he didn't like a game which was advertised on the site. really shows how low video game reviewers can go. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32116 Posts
I don't get it. also, this game isn't original or ground breaking. It's also bugged. Bugged implying that it is not perfect. | ||
|
exeexe
Denmark937 Posts
| ||
|
polgas
Canada1765 Posts
| ||
|
lossofmercy
United States29 Posts
Why would you read their opinion about games needing any nuance/complexity whatsoever? Look at anything that needs decent level of understanding like Mushihime-sama, Ikaruga, Marvel vs. Capcom 2, Street Fighter 4, etc. Aside from that, people care too much about near perfect. 9.8/10 Who cares, you aren't using a 100 point system to rate anything. Just say the game is fantastic (10/10, 5/5) but has a few hiccups, like any normal person would. | ||
|
Wineandbread
United States2065 Posts
We all have different tastes in games. In terms of multiplayer, MW2 excels at drawing in casual and moderate players, and everybody loves controversial storyline campaigns right (hurrr I'm gonna shoot all these civilians down in an airport) I'm only partially speaking from experience because I go play it every time people are over at my house (it's not my game) I like Starcraft 2 a lot. But a 10/10 would be unwarranted... there's a good number of flaws I can point out (albeit minor) and the multiplayer could use a couple features (hello LAN and chat channels). I think a 9/10 is a highly respectable score and deserved for the game. | ||
|
Morayfire73
United States298 Posts
On August 05 2010 07:56 Wineandbread wrote: Do I hear some fanboyism spewing from this blog We all have different tastes in games. In terms of multiplayer, MW2 excels at drawing in casual and moderate players, and everybody loves controversial storyline campaigns right (hurrr I'm gonna shoot all these civilians down in an airport) I'm only partially speaking from experience because I go play it every time people are over at my house (it's not my game) I like Starcraft 2 a lot. But a 10/10 would be unwarranted... there's a good number of flaws I can point out (albeit minor) and the multiplayer could use a couple features (hello LAN and chat channels). I think a 9/10 is a highly respectable score and deserved for the game. Well you are on a Starcraft fan site, it would be expected that there would be a starcraft favoritism. Honestly, no game should be a 10/10. SC2 is the BEST RTS that has ever been released, at least in terms of the single player campaign. The only game that it even on the same level as it in the multi-player sector is the original Starcraft. For a game that is pretty much the best in its genre, a 9/10 is kinda bad. | ||
|
Salv
Canada3083 Posts
| ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
| ||
|
dogabutila
United States1437 Posts
On August 04 2010 09:53 Craton wrote: There are several reasons it shouldn't be a 10, not the least of which are the lack of multiplayer features (which will undoubtedly be argued here in great length). There's also the issue of their archaic ranking system and placement system, the underdeveloped map-developer section, and the region-locking. Thats less about the game and more about bnet2.0 though. | ||
| ||
