On January 13 2010 00:31 Nal_rAwr wrote: you can't get on tv doing only covers...
this
and her vocals are a little weak - dunno if it's just the recording or her age/training, but her voice sounds a bit wispy and not full enough and in some areas a bit off key (but who needs that with the magic of autotune)
Her voice is actually quite good. It sounds weak and off tune because of the shitty mic and shitty room she's playing in.
On January 13 2010 04:31 boesthius wrote: she's pretty but has a pretty average voice =/. also none of the songs that she covers are within the genre emo.
let's be perfectly honest she is average looking as well.
On January 13 2010 01:02 lMPERVlOUS wrote: She's not bad, in terms of vocals. However, that doesn't mean she will get onto TV or whatever.....
It takes better vocals than that to get recognition, even on a city-wide level. Becoming famous, or even getting recognition on a larger scale is very difficult, and it is very rare as well. And, yes, only doing covers will not get you anywhere.....
A good example is a Canadian singer that I recently bought an album of. She is also a vocalist, but a different type. Here's a video of one of her own songs.
She is very good, some of her songs have millions of views on youtube. Yet she is still pretty much unknown. And there are many, many more artists in similar shoes. She's hit the radio only a few times (one of which I heard, which is how I found out about her).
damn this girl is great, im listening to "angel" right now. Sick find!
On January 13 2010 04:31 boesthius wrote: she's pretty but has a pretty average voice =/. also none of the songs that she covers are within the genre emo.
I agree with this. Granted, the music she is covering doesn't have demanding vocals, but she's attractive . 5/5 for actually posting an attractive girl in a blog, rather than ranting about one.
EPT
.
