On January 06 2010 02:18 ffswowsucks wrote:
oh ye to be able to finish a degree and work for the video game industry doesnt require knowledge of games. suuuureeee.and we play video games hardcore since we were 8 y old.

This guy made me rofl for a good 20 minutes. Awesome.

ffswowsucks

Greece2294 Posts

January 05 2010 17:24 GMT

#22

guys saying that MW2 isnt competitive, did u actually set up a clanmatch 5v5 like they do in CS tourneys or u just play online TDM alone in ur room. Cause its a big difference to play on LAN 5v5 than play online alone.

Boblion

France8043 Posts

January 05 2010 17:26 GMT

#23

On January 06 2010 01:05 ffswowsucks wrote:
this game looks crap in comparison with MW2

Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o

ffswowsucks

Greece2294 Posts

January 05 2010 17:28 GMT

#24

On January 06 2010 02:26 Boblion wrote:

Show nested quote +

Bw looks like crap compared to Supreme Commander o,o

Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay.

Boblion

France8043 Posts

January 05 2010 17:30 GMT

#25

On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote:

Show nested quote +

Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay.

Ok you are definitly a troll.

ffswowsucks

Greece2294 Posts

January 05 2010 17:32 GMT

#26

First you try to make a point to something and then because I make an argument you call me a troll. anything more clever to say at least?

ps: i m out of this topic, dont wanna start a conversation around MW2, it will ruin the thread. On a sidenote if the OP has this game for its 2nd favorite, so be it. other people have wow for their favorite game, not gonna critizise more.

GreEny K

Germany7312 Posts

January 05 2010 17:35 GMT

#27

On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote:

Show nested quote +

Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay.

Nobody is saying it doesn't but MW2 is one of those games that will be huge for a couple years and then nobody will play it... CS and BW on the other hand, both are ancient games and are AMAZINGLY popular and still considered huge.

CoL_Drake

Germany455 Posts

January 05 2010 17:40 GMT

#28

sucks bad clone of cs bad copy lol waste of time

9287

United States134 Posts

January 05 2010 17:45 GMT

#29

its probably a CS rip off with no recoil on the guns so it is about as easy to play as Halo 3 lol

konadora

Singapore66163 Posts

January 05 2010 18:02 GMT

#30

On January 06 2010 01:22 GreEny K wrote:

Show nested quote +

I don't believe the part about the sniping but then again I haven't played the game... CS is definitely one of the hardest games to be a good sniper in, but the people who are good and on top of that are on fire in a match are definitely game changers. I'll have to try this before I can make any other judgements about it.

it's kinda true, I watched a few live games of it and the difference in skill and speed displayed by the players is just incredible

PanN

United States2828 Posts

January 05 2010 18:17 GMT

#31

Sorry you're dead wrong if you think this game takes more skill than CS1.6.

XsebT

Denmark2980 Posts

January 05 2010 18:41 GMT

#32

The skill level of FPS games depends on how good the players are... Since cs has been out since 1999, I believe the strategic element is more developed in cs than in sa - at least on the pro level.
Imo sa is "just another FPS". I don't find it very interesting and the gameplay doesn't run as smooth as cs.

Try

United States1293 Posts

January 05 2010 18:46 GMT

#33

On January 06 2010 02:32 ffswowsucks wrote:
First you try to make a point to something and then because I make an argument you call me a troll. anything more clever to say at least?

ps: i m out of this topic, dont wanna start a conversation around MW2, it will ruin the thread. On a sidenote if the OP has this game for its 2nd favorite, so be it. other people have wow for their favorite game, not gonna critizise more.

My friend is game designer i play many game so i am game expertzzzz; i can make concrete rankzz of games and people who dont agree are stoopid and wrong.

btw this blog sucks. "zomg i like this game" followed by a youtube video. solid.

PanN

United States2828 Posts

January 05 2010 18:50 GMT

#34

On January 06 2010 02:28 ffswowsucks wrote:

Show nested quote +

Bw is the best strategy game ever, not for its graphics but for its gameplay. MW2 has SUPERB graphics compared to CS and SUPERB gameplay.

Lol, you think mw2 is good for competition, thats cute. Sorry, but its designed way too terrible.

Re-Play-

Dominican Republic825 Posts

January 05 2010 19:02 GMT

#35

my second best game is Unreal tournament 2004 ^^

WeSt

Portugal918 Posts

January 05 2010 19:18 GMT

#36

I played CS1.6 competitively for like 4 years and that game is a rip-off. Even the 1 shot AWP and the scope is the same. The sprite showing frags appears in the top right corner too and it has the same models as in CS. They use the same boosting technique as in CS to get to upper grounds. You have a knife as a primary weapon, again, just like in CS. The objective is to plant a bomb and the other team objective is to defuse it - like in CS.

iNcontroL

USA29055 Posts

January 05 2010 19:42 GMT

#37

I can understand not liking CS but you cannot possibly knock it.. it is the SCBW equivalent for the FPS world. Simply revolutionized competitive FPS.

This game is popular in korea and is TRASH. I know one of the coaches for the eSTRO team and HE doesn't like the game (he is former pro CS player in korea).

banana

Netherlands1189 Posts

January 05 2010 19:58 GMT

#38

Ehm from watching it first 5 minutes, it's basicly cs 1.6 remade, the changes are really bare minimum, I doubt they even tried to hide the fact it was just a complete rip-off.

HwangjaeTerran

Finland5967 Posts

January 05 2010 20:13 GMT

#39

AVA is nice IMO, best of the Korean CS clones.
Has the best graphics too.