|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
|
|
SO MANY BOXERS!
Looking forward to IdrA vs. Boxer.
|
Curses! I had a super special post ready. Thanks for doing the LR, though.
The full playoff scenario including the possibility that Zenio loses (what? lol) looks like this, I think:
+ Show Spoiler [Division 5 Playoff Scenarios] +Source: [NASL] The End is Near by motbobPainUser managed to play his games against Zenio. No walkover! I believe that creates a possible four-way head-to-head tie scenario between BoxeR, Sen, and Zenio if BoxeR loses to IdrA and both Sen and Zenio win. Head-to-head, Zenio > BoxeR > Sen > Zenio and IdrA would be > BoxeR but Sen > IdrA and Zenio > IdrA. What this should mean is that, using points, in the event of all 4 being tied, Sen and Zenio > BoxeR and IdrA. If Zenio, IdrA, and BoxeR tie then Zenio and IdrA > BoxeR. If Sen, IdrA, and BoxeR tie then IdrA and Sen > BoxeR.BoxeR advances to the finals with a win. BoxeR advances to the finals with a loss if both Sen and Zenio lose. Sen advances to the finals with a win. Sen advances to the finals with a loss if both Zenio and IdrA lose. Zenio advances to the finals with a win if either Sen or BoxeR loses. IdrA advances to the finals with a win if either Sen or Zenio loses. MaNa and Socke advance to the playoffs no matter what. ClouD can advance to the playoffs with a 2:0 win if TLO forfeits his position. Drewbie, Tyler, and PainUser cannot advance to the playoffs.
+ Show Spoiler [Racial Win %s] + 59.62% v 50.98% 56.15% v 45.45% 44.62% v 50.98% 62.81% v 65.22% 38.10% v 64.42%
|
|
go Socke! hey you never know- IdrA may have a chance after all (after all Sen did miss his EGMC match)
|
|
BratOK is:
31 BRAT_OK 4-5- 4
not 30 BRAT_OK 4-5 -2
he had free win from MC, but not +2 point
|
BOXER IDRA WHO ELSE IS HYPED!?!?!?!
|
Jesus the 11-30 player bracket for those 5 spots is going to be stacked as shit ><
|
why are the stupid matches first? *sigh*
|
BTW, motbob, you made a typo here
NaNiwa 6-2 (13-4) +11
He should have 9 points, yes?
Not too important, just saying ^^
|
Ahhhhhhhhh shit just got REAL.
|
On June 13 2011 09:00 confusedcrib wrote: BOXER IDRA WHO ELSE IS HYPED!?!?!?!
Oh Boxer please make us BW vets proud!
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On June 13 2011 09:00 ezekiel22 wrote: BratOK is:
31 BRAT_OK 4-5- 4
not 30 BRAT_OK 4-5 -2
he had free win from MC, but not +2 point The NASL has been very unclear about this. I'll assume that BRAT_OK got two point (which would make the most sense) unless I see a statement by Xeris otherwise.
|
On June 13 2011 09:10 motbob wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2011 09:00 ezekiel22 wrote: BratOK is:
31 BRAT_OK 4-5- 4
not 30 BRAT_OK 4-5 -2
he had free win from MC, but not +2 point The NASL has been very unclear about this. I'll assume that BRAT_OK got two point (which would make the most sense) unless I see a statement by Xeris otherwise.
I believe in that walkover the winner (brat_ok) got +2 points, but the loser (MC) didn't lose any points (0 instead of -2).
|
|
On June 13 2011 09:10 motbob wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2011 09:00 ezekiel22 wrote: BratOK is:
31 BRAT_OK 4-5- 4
not 30 BRAT_OK 4-5 -2
he had free win from MC, but not +2 point The NASL has been very unclear about this. I'll assume that BRAT_OK got two point (which would make the most sense) unless I see a statement by Xeris otherwise.
http://nasl.tv/News/Article/20110607nasl-playoffs-week-8-snapshot
and
http://nasl.tv/Standings
Anyway, you got right... NASL is extremly unclear on many things... HayPro vs DDe as well. (first ... free win for dde, then played )
|
That analysis is wrong now, though I believe it was even wrong then.
And the standings are noticeably sorted by points and alphabetical order after W:L ratio instead of head-to-head then points.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
NASL's site is notoriously inaccurate. Their statements about their handling of the MC vs BRAT_OK match do not match their standings.
|
|
|
|