EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXXII - Page 62
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Rad
United States935 Posts
What exactly is this "you are still on my radar" shit anyway? You're either suspicious of me or you're not. You felt the need to FoS 3 people but not me? Your logic isn't following sir. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Rad
United States935 Posts
You had your vote on me last lynch, but that shit didn't work. You're now FoSing 3 different people, none of which include your last lynch vote, but also subtly keeping the door open to move back to me if the opportunity presents itself. Now your reasoning is that Arn's guilt would imply my innocence, but the same goes for the rest of the people in this game, including the ones you FoS'd. You claim you're slinging shit at them to motivate, but also take the stance that I have basically done nothing the entire game. Why I no get motivations from you </3  ?? | ||
|
sour_eraser
Canada932 Posts
I saw what you wrote but I didn't comment on anything because I was going to see how Arn responds to your claims. I didn't want to jump on the bandwagon too early as we have some time. I'm currently getting a scum feeling about Axle. Did anyone thought he might be writing with that style on purpose? He said that he will ask and already asked a lot of questions to the coach, but I seriously wonder if he writes in the same manner as he do in this thread @Axle Why didn't you ever had FoS on me or other two lurkers? Why only on Rad, Yamato and Kickstart? How about CC as well? It seemed you have basically confirmed him as town as soon as game started. Why? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On December 11 2012 11:17 Rad wrote: I'm noting your actions, yamato, not the fact that every town should be suspicious of everyone right now. You had your vote on me last lynch, but that shit didn't work. You're now FoSing 3 different people, none of which include your last lynch vote, but also subtly keeping the door open to move back to me if the opportunity presents itself. Now your reasoning is that Arn's guilt would imply my innocence, but the same goes for the rest of the people in this game, including the ones you FoS'd. You claim you're slinging shit at them to motivate, but also take the stance that I have basically done nothing the entire game. Why I no get motivations from you </3 ??If you want to be all nitpicky about who I spoke about in my posts, go ahead, but I did not FoS anybody. I don't recall using the term this game at all. I called them out and told them that what they were doing was not pro-town in my eyes and that I was going to look into that. I did, and Arn is by far the most suspicious. Right now though you look pretty scummy because your "case" on me is hilariously weak and also opportunistic in the sense that you think you can actually get me lynched because of Axle's vote and the conflict between Arn and I. This fits right in with your opportunistic play D1 and D2 trying to get easy mislynches on players you thought were already under fire. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Rad
United States935 Posts
On December 11 2012 15:03 yamato77 wrote: If you want to be all nitpicky about who I spoke about in my posts, go ahead, but I did not FoS anybody. I don't recall using the term this game at all. I called them out and told them that what they were doing was not pro-town in my eyes and that I was going to look into that. I did, and Arn is by far the most suspicious. What??? On December 09 2012 16:36 yamato77 wrote: So my FoS is on Syl, Arn, and Axle. On December 11 2012 15:03 yamato77 wrote: Right now though you look pretty scummy because your "case" on me is hilariously weak and also opportunistic in the sense that you think you can actually get me lynched because of Axle's vote and the conflict between Arn and I. This fits right in with your opportunistic play D1 and D2 trying to get easy mislynches on players you thought were already under fire. Opportunistic because... axle has a vote on you? Axle places his vote randomly, or because he's angry at someone, or because __fill in the fucking blank__. It happens to be on you right now. I will be extremely surprised if he stays on you until the lynch. Consider me the first real vote on you. Anyway, no need to convince the scum that he's scum, just going to let the others decide. You're falling apart here, scum. On December 11 2012 15:09 yamato77 wrote: Also, I'm going to say this now because this nefarious scheme is probably gonna work but if I get lynched Rad is 100% scummy for how he has his vote placed on me atm. No worries here, when you flip red, I will /dance ^^ | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
This is hardly "falling apart." | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
sour_eraser
Canada932 Posts
Can't say Rad is perfectly innocent but somewhat more townish now. If Rad was a scum, would he kill a person that was accusing him? I'm not sure, I think that may be too obvious. He could have killed others, like Yamato and stay alive because it seems our townies can't agree on anything much Just because I didn't physically type you as a scum doesn't mean you are town. And that's what you're doing here. Yamato didn't mention you in FoS? That doesn't mean he still doesn't suspect you as a scum. You've got to take in the previous encounter. Yamato just voted for you in D2 which indicates that he had a scummy feeling against you . Why would that suddenly vanish away unless something major happend? As I write this, I think you are trying to exploit what he has said and convince the town to turn their back on him. Hmm. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
First we have Axle. He plays his own version of this game that doesn't involve doing anything other than pushing his own separate agenda. Then we have the lurkers. They rarely post, and when they do, they either make silly decisions or decide to not do anything at all, basically. Prodding and complaining about this fact has done nothing. 3 players who are basically useless to me because they don't make original arguments or discuss their reasoning, they just come in the thread, make their post, and then leave. Finally we have Rad, who is basically claiming scum at this point with his really fucking dumb post and vote on me that makes zero sense. Is that really a good reason to vote for someone at this point in the game? Some kind of imagined discrepancy between my posts that somehow belies I'm scum? It doesn't even detail HOW my play is scummy, it just makes snide remarks about my play without actually making the connection to scum agenda. Honestly, I want to lynch all of you. The sad fact is that only one of you is scum and the rest of you have done nothing to make that person more apparent. | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
A lot of posts made by Oats always ask about people's opinion on yamato. Why is he so intent on getting that information? On December 04 2012 13:37 Oatsmaster wrote: What do you think about yamato voting you? On December 04 2012 13:58 Oatsmaster wrote: So you are gonna ignore yamato's vote? Do you have a town/scum read on yamato? On December 04 2012 14:31 Oatsmaster wrote: IMO Opinions help a lot in determining reads, so when Axle answered the question obliquely or not at all, it doesnt help yamato determine a read so yamato pressure votes Axle. its a pressure vote kickstart. (Why does he feel the need to explain what yamato does when he is clearly capable of doing it himself) On December 04 2012 20:38 Oatsmaster wrote: k cool. What do you think about kickstarts suspicion towards yamato? Also what do you think about yamato? The following posts after that are the ones where people begin to wonder - why did he say yamato was suspicious, then complete 180 and say he was town? Naturally, Oats also did mention Kickstart a lot, but that's because he was pushing for a mislynch to happen so that is only natural that the majority of the time Kick was being talked about by him. So here I wonder, was the plan on day 1 something like this, or did it eventually lead to this: - Everyone starts the game, and off the bat people are suspicious of yamato. - To help draw attention away, yamato stops posting and oats gets to work on a case against Kickstart instead, while also defending people suspecting yamato. - During all this, opinions on yamato are given when asked as this obviously helps the scum work out who they should take out first. - Oats continues his case against Kickstart, but at this point does the 180, and it really seems like he's now subtly putting it out there that yamato is innocent. - Case goes against oats now and he is lynched. In each of the days including the first, yamato has never changed his vote. A smart move, if he was scum because on the first day, going with the crowd would leave him with explaining to do, day 2 ended up with a no lynch, meaning there was a free kill for the scum in any case, and then finally we have day 3 - where him, Arn and I are the most suspicious ones of the group. Within the first few hours of the day he decides to target Arn, and we're left where we are. The majority of this case is based behind the actions of Oats, and I think that he has left enough clues to find the other member of the mafia team. This is the way I decided to look at it this time, and it is the way I am going to vote today. ##vote Yamato | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
... Huh? | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
Also @Arnarnion if you could tell me when you would next be around that would be helpful. Also if anyone wont be here near lynch tomorrow could you tell me it may be important. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On December 11 2012 18:51 yamato77 wrote: How about you participate in the game the rest of us are having instead of existing in your own bubble? Thank you for your advice but my filter is quite long enough. I have needed to think. I now hve profitable plan to be st use my time between now and tomorrows lynch. As I asked will you be here near the end I think my last questions would be to you? BTW I will now have read of what was achieved while i was thinking and sleeping. | ||
| ||
