EPT[Code A] RO24 Day 1 WCS Korea Season 1 2013 - Page 14
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
fezvez
France3021 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
| ||
|
Fenneth
Australia354 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:07 Fenneth wrote: 10:00-15:00 Supernova hits a nice scan and appears to know what's coming, adds ghost academy Creator starts a 3rd base but also pushes towards Supernova's 2nd Big attack into Terran natural with chargelot+archon vs bio (~110 supply for Protoss, ~125 for Terran) - Supernova defends comfortably Ghosts started, widow mine production continues, Creator has 3rd established but 3 medivacs drop Protoss main; main nexus falls, Terran loses 1 medivac Supernova drops again, kills templar archives. Creator losing a ton, natural nexus dies and widow mines kill probes at 3rd 15:00-20:00 Creator picks off 1 medivac, goes for desperate attack at Supernova's natural but many ghosts are there and the archons melt Creator GGs - game 1 to Supernova | ||
|
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
| ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
On May 15 2013 14:54 Evil_Sheep wrote: That was true last season, not this season: Kespa v ESF code A ro48: Kespa 6-7 ESF ro32: Kespa 5-4 ESF Total over 2 rounds: 11-11 Now it's 12-11...hardly domination If you were a extremely casual fan, yes, this holds true. Take a look at the players involves in a lot of those eSF victories, and the KeSPA victories, and it paints a different story. | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:05 Wombat_NI wrote: Planetary Nexus is a fucking dumb thing to call it, I don't know why that has caught on. See 'Zealot legs' for another Blizzard-assigned name are always pretty corny though. Photon overcharge sounds like a flashlight to me. Planetary is just convenient because the similar concept of a PF is already in people's minds. | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
| ||
|
mcmartini
Australia1972 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6566 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:05 Wombat_NI wrote: Planetary Nexus is a fucking dumb thing to call it, I don't know why that has caught on. See 'Zealot legs' for another starcraft players have a hard time with figuring out the names of things when the word "charge" is involved.. see photon overcharge, zealot charge, prismatic alignment (aka charge xD) | ||
|
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland27410 Posts
Planetary Nexus does not make sense, as a name. Nexus Cannon at least describes the function, planetary nexus doesn't mean anything, it's only vaguely related to the defensive purpose of the Planetary Fortress | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Fenneth
Australia354 Posts
Creator vs Supernova game 2 - Daybreak 0:00-5:00 Creator gate first, probe scouts this time Supernova 14cc on high ground again Creator stops mining gas for faster nexus (before core) Supernova adds 2 rax Supernova adds gases, neither player shows tech path as yet | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:10 Wombat_NI wrote: Creator is pretty bad in HoTS, at least every PvT I've seen him play he's looked bad. Planetary Nexus does not make sense, as a name. Nexus Cannon at least describes the function, planetary nexus doesn't mean anything, it's only vaguely related to the defensive purpose of the Planetary Fortress That's true. | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7997 Posts
| ||
|
ssxsilver
United States4409 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
Popkiller
3415 Posts
On May 15 2013 15:14 Tsubbi wrote: why does creator suck so much in hots :/ never know whats going on with someone in their personal life or whatever, might not be hots, could be anything. | ||
| ||
