EPTMLG Arenas now free - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
NovaTheFeared
United States7232 Posts
| ||
|
Antimatterz
United States1010 Posts
| ||
|
polyphonyEX
United States2539 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:46 slyderturtle wrote: I really want to know what their numbers were like for Anaheim... Just pretty fucking huge. Glad to see this. Imposing an arbitrary paywall for a tournament stream is in no way conducive to the growth of esports in the general populace. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:46 slyderturtle wrote: I really want to know what their numbers were like for Anaheim... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=344926 those are the viewing numbers | ||
|
Antimatterz
United States1010 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:48 NovaTheFeared wrote: Shows how poorly the PPV model worked last time AND the benefits of voicing our disagreement about the PPV model. It sounds like it wasn't that the PPV model was bad so much as other things were so successful they are adding the option of a free stream. | ||
|
Hnnngg
United States1101 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:48 NovaTheFeared wrote: Shows how poorly the PPV model worked last time AND the benefits of voicing our disagreement about the PPV model. No it doesn't. Stop making shit up. PPV wasn't a "choice". It was either PPV or nothing, now they have a choice (it fucking says in his tweets "now I have choices makes my job easier") and they're changing it. Only because they can, not because of whiny SC2 fans. | ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
| ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
Reverse psychology D; | ||
|
Pocky52
United States463 Posts
| ||
|
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
Either way good job MLG! Edit: Maybe not after JP's post, but the doors are not closed yet for my theory =). | ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10380 Posts
| ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:49 Hnnngg wrote: No it doesn't. Stop making shit up. PPV wasn't a "choice". It was either PPV or nothing, now they have a choice (it fucking says in his tweets "now I have choices makes my job easier") and they're changing it. Only because they can, not because of whiny SC2 fans. lol, its funny that you bash on his argument with another argument that has no actual facts to back it up. (twiter is gud evidence durr..) | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:58 sc14s wrote: lol, its funny that you bash on his argument with another argument that has no actual facts to back it up. (twiter is gud evidence durr..) well unlike the other guy, he actually has some evidence. Sundance has said multiple times that PPV has worked and the events were viable with the sales of PPV passes. So... yeah, NovaTheFeared is wrong. | ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:48 NovaTheFeared wrote: Shows how poorly the PPV model worked last time AND the benefits of voicing our disagreement about the PPV model. Not true at all. (Edit: people have already posted evidence as to why. Sundance's tweets, past threads/testimonies.) I love MLG. And I just bought a gold membership, silly me. Hopefully we get some nice benefits. Thanks very much Sundance, hopefully we'll see even more success for y'all! | ||
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
| ||
|
Synche
United States1345 Posts
On June 23 2012 12:59 jmbthirteen wrote: well unlike the other guy, he actually has some evidence. Sundance has said multiple times that PPV has worked and the events were viable with the sales of PPV passes. So... yeah, NovaTheFeared is wrong. The original post was complete shit, this change shows absolutely nothing about the PPV model, and in fact Sundance directly contradicts what he said in his tweets. | ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
| ||
|
elfen
Korea (South)52 Posts
| ||
|
ZisforZerg
United States224 Posts
 | ||
| ||
