|
On March 05 2016 00:00 Shellshock wrote:
ianasu
Didn't give him an interview yesterday, don't even learn his name today. They need to keep their secret hatred more hidden.
|
Just checking the results from the train makes me hope that my train doesn't derail in the way the Neeb hype train did today ...
Normally, I would cheer for Nerchio all the way, but now I am conflicted, because I don't want to watch ZvZs. I think he should show Huk his boundaries and then gracefully lose to Polt to save us from the ultimate horror. Even now already 3 granted ZvZs from Ro8 on is terrible. I am not sure if I will stay for that.
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate  Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over  Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p
Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:01 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Didn't give him an interview yesterday, don't even learn his name today. They need to keep their secret hatred more hidden.
And he even speaks English ._.
|
On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v
Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of ranking them one by one
|
Nah I prefer a top-32 Power Rank. Although back in the day, they used to only be top 10, and it was a very closed scene.
|
I just learnt that that are 3 guaranteed ZvZ's in the Ro8, which means there will be a ZvZ in the Ro4. 
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:[quote] When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each
Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system.
|
United States97277 Posts
|
On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:
[quote]
Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9.
TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system.
I think that we're just railing on you out of love, since we don't even see Power Ranks much anymore.
|
On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:
[quote]
Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9.
TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system.
Drogo losing in ro4 and Polt in ro8? Not better i guess but not worse
But its impossible to take everything into account unless you watched every 32 player in every tournament for the last month anyway, people dont get that
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:05 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:[quote] "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system. I think that we're just railing on you out of love, since we don't even see Power Ranks much anymore.
I know I don't really care, I mean, it's more interesting to have stuff wrong than to put everything exactly normal and end up being perfect. And the writing's still good, at least to me~
|
On March 05 2016 00:07 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:05 IntoTheheart wrote:On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:[quote] Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system. I think that we're just railing on you out of love, since we don't even see Power Ranks much anymore. I know I don't really care, I mean, it's more interesting to have stuff wrong than to put everything exactly normal and end up being perfect. And the writing's still good, at least to me~
As long as you like it - I haven't even clicked on that yet. 
|
On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:
[quote]
Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9.
TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system.
Is there really controversy? Power ranks are made to be ridiculed with captain hindsight information, isn't that their purpose
|
i think i will cheer for iAsonu
|
United States97277 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:07 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:[quote] "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system. Is there really controversy? Power ranks are made to be ridiculed with captain hindsight information, isn't that their purpose
yes
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:04 EatingBomber wrote:I just learnt that that are 3 guaranteed ZvZ's in the Ro8, which means there will be a ZvZ in the Ro4.
Yeah ._.
|
China6333 Posts
(1727) iAsonu 0-0 Elazer (2020)
-----------------------------------------
5.17% 3-0 0-3 24.71%
9.73% 3-1 1-3 27.61%
12.21% 3-2 2-3 20.57%
-----------------------------------------
27.11% 72.89%
Median outcome: iAsonu 1-3 Elazer
Estimated by Aligulac. Modify.
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 05 2016 00:06 ArtyK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2016 00:04 Soularion wrote:On March 05 2016 00:04 ArtyK wrote:On March 05 2016 00:01 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:59 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:[quote] "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p Ehh. Predictions for each match makes the focus on the match, while I wanted to keep the focus on the players. If I get fanboy hate, no big deal. It's not like it matters. v0v Maybe only have top 32-16, 16-8, 8-4, 4-2, 2-1 ranks then, instead of 32 each Would that really have avoided the controversy? I mean, the two picks I get flack for (PtitDrogo #3 and Polt #5) would've been even more questionable with that system. Drogo losing in ro4 and Polt in ro8? Not better i guess but not worse But its impossible to take everything into account unless you watched every 32 player in every tournament for the last month anyway, people dont get that
The probably isn't necessarily that, but rather taking into account the shift from online to offline. Polt and Hydra /way/ underperformed both online and at Leipzig, so how do you factor that in going into the PR? What about PtitDrogo, who has always struggled online but came out huge at Leipzig?
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
Ah, great. "iAsonu seems really good on defense so I'm not sure he's gonna play as aggressive. Oh, it's a ling/bane all-in!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
