|
On March 04 2016 23:47 Makro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:43 Philozovic wrote:
Neeb and MLord out ?
Who is going to stop the korean invasion now ?
THE ONE AND ONLY GATEAU DE FEU i knew that if marinelord went through, the narrative just wouldn't fit firegod is there to save european sc2 like it was meant to be pray the lord my friends
He does look quite lordly
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/a6wGWqg.jpg)
|
On March 04 2016 23:47 Poopi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:43 Philozovic wrote:
Neeb and MLord out ?
Who is going to stop the korean invasion now ?
THE ONE AND ONLY GATEAU DE FEU His French ID is GateauEnFeu tho
+ Show Spoiler +
|
If Polt doesn't make it then at least the maps will be balanced for all those zvz
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate  Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego
Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid.
|
On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid.
You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego
|
On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid.
Worst PR since September 2013
|
|
|
On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013
Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important?
|
On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego
You bastard :D
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important?
Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over 
|
On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D
HOSTILE POSTING ENVIRONMENT.
|
Damn ESL has so much good music.But i can't find playlist.
|
On March 04 2016 23:50 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:47 Makro wrote:On March 04 2016 23:43 Philozovic wrote:
Neeb and MLord out ?
Who is going to stop the korean invasion now ?
THE ONE AND ONLY GATEAU DE FEU i knew that if marinelord went through, the narrative just wouldn't fit firegod is there to save european sc2 like it was meant to be pray the lord my friends He does look quite lordly
nice montage
|
On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D
Dude, you're either the living incarnation of the TL writer's curse or just generally unlucky with your predictions
|
On March 04 2016 23:57 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:57 ArtyK wrote:On March 04 2016 23:56 Philozovic wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. Worst PR since September 2013 Not that i read all PR's since 2013 but is that really important? Note that there's been, like, six PRs since September 2013, and this tournament is hardly over
Giving up on ranking all 32 players and just making predictions on each rounds of the bracket while keeping the write-up for each player would probably get you less fanboys hate :p
|
Canada2764 Posts
On March 04 2016 23:59 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D Dude, you're either the living incarnation of the TL writer's curse or just generally unlucky with your predictions
You should've seen my first few groups predicted, I seriously went like 0-12
|
On March 04 2016 23:59 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D Dude, you're either the living incarnation of the TL writer's curse or just generally unlucky with your predictions
How could I have anticipated that my curse was stronger than Artosis'?
|
On March 05 2016 00:00 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:59 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D Dude, you're either the living incarnation of the TL writer's curse or just generally unlucky with your predictions You should've seen my first few groups predicted, I seriously went like 0-12
I might've been there for that.
|
United States97276 Posts
|
On March 05 2016 00:00 Soularion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 23:59 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:57 EatingBomber wrote:On March 04 2016 23:55 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:52 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:49 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:48 Soularion wrote:On March 04 2016 23:47 Elentos wrote:On March 04 2016 23:45 EatingBomber wrote:
When can we finally get a map pool that is rational? When TL preview articles exceed 50% prediction rate Going by PR-as-head-to-head (which isn't necessarily correct) PR is currently 14-9. TIL 9 = 14 "But my PR isn't meant to be a prediction of who wins", he said. As if I was talking about that one in particular. Check the ego Even without trying my PR has a 50% prediction rate, which breaks your clause. Ego unchecked, kid. You weren't even invited to this conversation in which I was trying to subtly bash EatingBomber's GSL predictions, check your ego You bastard :D Dude, you're either the living incarnation of the TL writer's curse or just generally unlucky with your predictions You should've seen my first few groups predicted, I seriously went like 0-12
A TL writer's life is a rough life. But sometimes you get called out on stream for a prediction and it turns out you were right all along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[image loading]](http://www.millenium.org/images/contenu/actus/sc2/sc2_joueur_nSg_FireCake_Che.jpg)
830
545
EPT
