EPT[WCS] EU Challenger - Day 2 Season 3 2015 - Page 20
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Elentos
55566 Posts
| ||
|
mYiKane
Canada1772 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:55 IntoTheheart wrote: When was this? He was just talking to RememberMe if I recall correctly. And Nani told not-Chill to get the fuck out. It's all a matter of context. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:55 Elentos wrote: I like Rotti pointing out "Hatch first on the low ground." we have 2 of the most creative zergs in this game. doesn't hurt to let people know  | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:56 Ej_ wrote: TLO said he held 10pool bane with 15hatchery 9 times out of 10 But this is the 1 that matters... | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24593 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:55 Yorkie wrote: Yeah silly Bunny falling out in the semifinals to Polt and Lilbow in the two previous seasons. Should've just won that idiot. It was so easy! :D My point is that Bunny is overall worse than people who have more points than him and that this is proven in his performance throughout the entire year, while you're implying that he's just got "one shot" overall and that the system is somehow unfair. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:54 Yorkie wrote: It deserves to be lmao. Look at the recent Code S groups announced. There isn't a single weak group there. Know why? Because we have ~50 amazing Korean players competing to get into a 32 man GSL and 16 man SSL. Everything is stacked and oftentimes great players don't even qualify. But this is what everyone wanted Uh? Yeah I agree, Korea deserved to be richer and that's great. But the goal of Blizzard's policy for this year was clearly not to insta-get two or three foreigners at BlizzCon, else they would have done things differently. | ||
|
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:55 Kaizor wrote: I don't think using GSL and SSL are good examples. You don't make semis in them without being really good. I would hardly classify making Semis in WCS as proving yourself as a really good player Even if you don't agree with that. I will seriously disagree that Bunny was cheesed out. For crying out loud, Starbuck was basically doing the same freaking thing the entire series. ROACHES. In a BO5. There was no excuse at all to not just play safer for 1 game. Making semis in GSL proves you are a top GSL player. Making top 4 in WCS (twice in a row no less) means you are a top WCS player. It's all relative, you can't really compare the two. And no Bunny didn't get cheesed out but people have and that's why I feel it's important that top performers are rewarded with seeds into the next season | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
Aeromi
France14461 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:54 Benk wrote: Did anyone notice that Starbuck used profanity during his match vs Bunny? According to WCS rules, this is a violation that is left up to the organizers on how it is going to be disciplined? This doesn't sit well with me since it's not systematic enough and I feel that it opens the door to prejudiced decisions. Is there somewhere to make suggestions? Don't steal my job please. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
fruity.
England1711 Posts
I've also got cookies (those nice triple choc inhouse jobs from Sainsbury's, and no you can't have any) | ||
|
Kaizor
Singapore909 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:57 Yorkie wrote: that's why I feel it's important that top performers are rewarded with seeds into the next season Even if they are performing like how Bunny perform in that series? | ||
|
Supter
France382 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:57 Yorkie wrote: Making semis in GSL proves you are a top GSL player. Making top 4 in WCS (twice in a row no less) means you are a top WCS player. It's all relative, you can't really compare the two. And no Bunny didn't get cheesed out but people have and that's why I feel it's important that top performers are rewarded with seeds into the next season 4 roach all-ins is what I call getting cheesed out. Doesn't mean Bunny couldn't hold them, but they were still all-ins. | ||
|
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:56 Heartland wrote: My point is that Bunny is overall worse than people who have more points than him and that this is proven in his performance throughout the entire year, while you're implying that he's just got "one shot" overall and that the system is somehow unfair. I've always thought one bo5 to determine whether you get to compete in any fashion besides weekly tournaments in sc2 for the next 3 months is moronic, but in this case I'm only saying that this series was Bunny's only shot at making Blizzcon starting from this moment. Yes if he won the two previous wcs seasons he'd be in a better spot, i think we all see that's obvious. | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:59 Kaizor wrote: Even if they are performing like how Bunny perform in that series? Wow 4 games such sample size where's swag_bro to tell us how big a slump Bunny is in. You ever play ladder? Ever go on a 3+ game losing streak? because Bunny just went on 3 game losing streak only the games were streamed and at the end his blizzcon hopes were gone | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24593 Posts
On July 29 2015 01:59 Yorkie wrote: I've always thought one bo5 to determine whether you get to compete in any fashion besides weekly tournaments in sc2 for the next 3 months is moronic, but in this case I'm only saying that this series was Bunny's only shot at making Blizzcon starting from this moment. Yes if he won the two previous wcs seasons he'd be in a better spot, i think we all see that's obvious. Very well : ) | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
| ||
