EPTNo, it just has a different meaning.
[SPL] Prime vs CJ Round 3 2014 - Page 23
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
No, it just has a different meaning. | ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
well it's one of the reasons why flash is touted as #1 PL player when his winrate is below several others' | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On April 28 2014 22:29 opterown wrote: well it's one of the reasons why flash is touted as #1 PL player when his winrate is below several others' And the fact they don't include playoffs. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
No because if they take the win % system, that would mean that a guy with 1-0 is #1. | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
|
Kasaraki
Denmark7115 Posts
But I think an indicator might be a fun way to do it too, just like for the team ranking. The one with the biggest different betweens wins and losses tops the ranking. :p | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
Edit: Or maybe not. Then that damn 1-0 guy beats 14-14 | ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On April 28 2014 22:36 The_Red_Viper wrote: Well yeah obviously that system would be bad too, but right now the "best player" could have 15:21 stats, i mean that is pretty stupid if you ask me (the best player right now has 14 wins right?) It's pretty difficult to get 14 or 15 wins with how many opportunities they get. Whoever has the most wins has gotta be playing a lot, as well as ace matches and winning a good % of them. No way a 15-21 record could happen while other ACE players are stuck at records like 14-7. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On April 28 2014 22:55 Scarecrow wrote: It's pretty difficult to get 14 or 15 wins with how many opportunities they get. Whoever has the most wins has gotta be playing a lot, as well as ace matches and winning a good % of them. No way a 15-21 record could happen while other ACE players are stuck at records like 14-7. Well i just mentioned the worst possible result right now (that would be number one though), obviously it isn't very likely, but imo it shows the problem of this system. I mean the best way to get number one is to have a mediocre team that goes to the ace very often. Now you can "farm" wins, you don't even need to win all of them, just around 50%, that isn't really the best player imo :D So yeah, i really dislike the current system. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On April 28 2014 23:15 The_Red_Viper wrote: Well i just mentioned the worst possible result right now (that would be number one though), obviously it isn't very likely, but imo it shows the problem of this system. I mean the best way to get number one is to have a mediocre team that goes to the ace very often. Now you can "farm" wins, you don't even need to win all of them, just around 50%, that isn't really the best player imo :D So yeah, i really dislike the current system. You should be happy KT is in the top. Also there's no other possible Top ranking. Maybe an aligulac ? Does it account for game played / % wins etc.. ? | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On April 28 2014 22:32 Boucot wrote: No because if they take the win % system, that would mean that a guy with 1-0 is #1. It makes just as much sense if #1 has score of 8-11 while #2 is 7-0 in the current system. Both systems are heavily flawed, they should use the third one. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
So i guess i have to live with it and just be mad that TY isn't number one :D | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On April 28 2014 23:36 Ramiz1989 wrote: It makes just as much sense if #1 has score of 8-11 while #2 is 7-0 in the current system. Both systems are heavily flawed, they should use the third one. Except it's virtually impossible for one mediocre player to play 19 games whilst an unstoppable player only plays 7 (barring some ridiculous rookie breakout - still mathematically there's just no way an 8-11 record can be #1). The best players will get to the top of this ranking over the course of a season just like they always do. If you don't have a good winrate you simply can't amass the number of wins to top this anyway in the long term. If TY played more ace matches he'd probably be #1. The ranking actually favors ace players (extra opportunity for wins), which is fair enough given their opponents. | ||
|
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
 surprised they sent out Hydra and not Bbyong, maybe because he was fresh | ||
|
PerSe
United Kingdom550 Posts
also Flash is apparently a practice bonjwa in the KT house, and that's probably why he gets sent out for ace matches more than TY. | ||
|
uTears
Venezuela19 Posts
.. At least hydra wear his super hero tshirt and won the ace, and ofc Bbyong won as well, more points to me. | ||
|
GTPGlitch
5061 Posts
On April 29 2014 00:35 Yorkie wrote: I guess has herO has officially lost his spot as CJ's ace surprised they sent out Hydra and not Bbyong, maybe because he was freshI would guess Creator would've prepared hard for playing against Bbyong - it's fairly likely that the one true hero is suffering from a little bit of a confidence issue right now, so Bbyong would be a better choice, which means he would be the target of a lot of prep, which means Hydra could snipe in peace | ||
| ||
