[Code A] Group C Season 2 2014 - Page 11
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
geokilla
Canada8218 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
Die4Ever
United States17588 Posts
| ||
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:22 geokilla wrote: What the hell is with these intros? GOM sucks now. What happened to their production that they were so well known for? GOM was known for good production? | ||
vult
United States9399 Posts
| ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:21 TommyP wrote: awful doesn't mean not enjoyable. Poor play leads to some of the best games. If I was watching a 100 meter sprint between two people, and both competitors ran like they were in qwop the entire way I probably wouldn't enjoy it | ||
![]()
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:22 Shellshock wrote: Tassadar all in less than Hongun? could have sworn they were both 100% all inners. Maybe not One time Tassadar went to 3 base. Once. | ||
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:19 bo1b wrote: Probably not attack move into 2 spine crawlers and a queen, when the zerg has no spawning pool, and no natural would probably be a better choice The attack was dumb, but he was acting like Tassadar misplayed when the lings were killing all his probes. There was no way he could've defended the lings, aside from somehow preventing the lings from exiting the main via a zealot wall on the ramp or something. | ||
vult
United States9399 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:23 bo1b wrote: If I was watching a 100 meter sprint between two people, and both competitors ran like they were in qwop the entire way I probably wouldn't enjoy it You're crazy to think that that wouldn't be funny. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:23 Yorkie wrote: The attack was dumb, but he was acting like Tassadar misplayed when the lings were killing all his probes. There was no way he could've defended the lings, aside from somehow preventing the lings from exiting the main via a zealot wall on the ramp or something. He could have done a hell of a lot better then a moving into them | ||
Yorkie
United States12612 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:23 bo1b wrote: He could have done a hell of a lot better then a moving into them You're clearly not enjoying these games, go somewhere else and enjoy your birthday! | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:21 Shellshock wrote: 0:00 ![]() ![]() 2:00 pool first for DRG Nexus first for Tassadar forge for Tassadar hatch for DRG 3:00 gateway for Tassadar cannon for Tassadar 4:00 double gas for Tassadar 3rd base for DRG Cybernetics core for Tassadar 5:00 proxy pylon in the top right corner of the map is scouted by DRG ling MSC for Tassadar double gas for DRG sentry for Tassadar | ||
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
hahaha | ||
vult
United States9399 Posts
| ||
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:23 Yorkie wrote: The attack was dumb, but he was acting like Tassadar misplayed when the lings were killing all his probes. There was no way he could've defended the lings, aside from somehow preventing the lings from exiting the main via a zealot wall on the ramp or something. He could of run the probes arun till the zelots made it make. when you have twice the probes has drones, you can afford the lost mining time. | ||
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:21 Zenbrez wrote: Means the same thing. I would recommend a game because I enjoyed it, there's no implication it was a 40 min macro incredibly even back-and-forth best of the best level game. No, it isn't. You recommend something if you think the other party will enjoy it. Your enjoyment is only a part of what you should consider; plenty of the current "recommendations" merely mean "this was funny in context". | ||
![]()
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:25 vult wrote: 3 Bases! Cause his proxy got caught D: | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
![]() | ||
ssxsilver
United States4409 Posts
On April 10 2014 14:26 WigglingSquid wrote: No, it isn't. You recommend something if you think the other party will enjoy it. Your enjoyment is only a part of what you should consider; plenty of the current "recommendations" merely mean "this was funny in context". Just because you don't enjoy hilarious games, doesn't mean the majority who visit LR don't. I'd say the opposite is true based on how everyone comments/votes. | ||
| ||