EPTAPM League Host by Golden - Page 3
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
goody153
44237 Posts
| ||
|
ShowTheLights
Korea (South)1705 Posts
On December 24 2013 23:34 AxCranK wrote: Hey golden. Can I cast with you? It must be fun GOLDEN LET CRANK CAST WITH YOU | ||
|
Spec
Taiwan931 Posts
| ||
|
13th Marine
United States344 Posts
| ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
Of course I wouldn't expect that to happen, but Golden, you may want to make sure there aren't any shenanigans going on, with people leaving early or anything like that... | ||
|
tili
United States1332 Posts
This is amazing. he's become such an awesome personality since leaving ST! Is golden still a pro-gamer? | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On December 25 2013 04:07 bduddy wrote: So let me get this straight... if I spam APM for 10 seconds then leave, and my opponent was busy typing "gl hf", I win? Sounds great! Of course I wouldn't expect that to happen, but Golden, you may want to make sure there aren't any shenanigans going on, with people leaving early or anything like that... Well, since Golden makes the rules, he can probably just use his own judgement to identify cheating. Also, Crank/Golden co-cast PLEASE!! | ||
|
Noobity
United States871 Posts
So no, you can't just spam and leave. EDIT: so it just occurred to me that your idea is to spam and leave, relying on having the apm while the other guy is just playing legit planning on getting their apm up later. Yeah I think Golden would tell that player off. Golden don't take no nonsense. | ||
|
ClueClueClue
Sweden1203 Posts
On December 25 2013 04:32 Noobity wrote: From what I can see, if you win but don't have the required apm, you don't win. if you lose and have the required apm but the other player also has the required apm, you lose. So no, you can't just spam and leave. According to that logic, you can, because your opponent's win doesn't count as long as his/her apm doesn't exceed 200. However, this kind of abuse is pretty easy to spot and can just be dealt with with a general ban on "sneaky circumvention of the rules". | ||
|
claybones
United States244 Posts
| ||
|
CTMxGlow
Chile4 Posts
| ||
|
habeck
1120 Posts
On December 25 2013 04:36 Zackeva wrote: According to that logic, you can, because your opponent's win doesn't count as long as his/her apm doesn't exceed 200. However, this kind of abuse is pretty easy to spot and can just be dealt with with a general ban on "sneaky circumvention of the rules". What abuse? There is no way to abuse, go read rules again. If you win with 200 or more apm you win if you lose with 200 or more apm, but your opponent doesnt have 200 or more apm, you win if you lose with 200 apm or more apm, and you opponent has 200 or more apm, you lose if both of you dont have 200 apm, you both lose and next round is WO | ||
|
Lovedoll
Japan540 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
On December 25 2013 05:34 habeck wrote: What abuse? There is no way to abuse, go read rules again. If you win with 200 or more apm you win if you lose with 200 or more apm, but your opponent doesnt have 200 or more apm, you win if you lose with 200 apm or more apm, and you opponent has 200 or more apm, you lose if both of you dont have 200 apm, you both lose and next round is WO On December 25 2013 04:07 bduddy wrote: So let me get this straight... if I spam APM for 10 seconds then leave, and my opponent was busy typing "gl hf", I win? Sounds great! Of course I wouldn't expect that to happen, but Golden, you may want to make sure there aren't any shenanigans going on, with people leaving early or anything like that... This would allow someone to win according to your rule #2 with no effort if the opponent bothers to chat at all or doesn't focus on spamming immediately. | ||
|
nucLeaRTV
Romania822 Posts
 That race is so hard to spam. | ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
| ||
|
cCav
62 Posts
| ||
|
Sabre
United Kingdom1086 Posts
On December 25 2013 03:29 MangoMountain wrote: best get that apm spamming back to full force indeed, my new pc has helped it though heheh : - ) | ||
|
Bop
United States19 Posts
On December 25 2013 07:46 cCav wrote: Bop would wreck this, would love to see him play! imagine what I would look like spamming, oh god. | ||
|
merz
Sweden2760 Posts
Raise it to 300 and I'd consider it, anyone can muster 200. | ||
| ||
