|
Hero vs Sage.
This should be short and sweet.
|
Vatican City State733 Posts
Bubbles you son of a bitch, you took my coach park and now my Nony? Death to your tribe :p
|
On June 30 2013 10:00 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:58 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:54 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:53 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both. Should have formulated that differently. What I'm trying to say: had they met in the semis Kane would already have had a great run(and CatZ too, ofc), now (an early round of the LB) it's just a case of a team manager getting out of the way of a team member, you could argue that Catz should not even have signed up with that premise, maybe, maybe not. You have basically just stated the problem and not given a reason why its ok. Its basically just me robbing a bank. You could argue that I shouldn't have even entered the building, maybe maybe not right? I'm genuinely confused as to what the problem is. (in the SC2 context) If it is true-he gave his team member a bye into the next round. This is not acceptable and is absolutely no different than if he played and deliberately threw the games. Which I assume everyone would have a problem with. What is the difference?
In general team mates should not forfeit to team mates. If coach park forfeited to Demuslim, there would be a whole reddit thread about it, 500 comments deep.
|
On June 30 2013 10:03 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 10:02 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 10:00 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:58 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:54 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:53 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both. Should have formulated that differently. What I'm trying to say: had they met in the semis Kane would already have had a great run(and CatZ too, ofc), now (an early round of the LB) it's just a case of a team manager getting out of the way of a team member, you could argue that Catz should not even have signed up with that premise, maybe, maybe not. You have basically just stated the problem and not given a reason why its ok. Its basically just me robbing a bank. You could argue that I shouldn't have even entered the building, maybe maybe not right? I'm genuinely confused as to what the problem is. (in the SC2 context) If it is true- he gave his team member a bye into the next round. This is not acceptable and is absolutely no different than if he played and deliberately threw the games. Which I assume everyone would have a problem with. What is the difference? @bold part: this is exactly what happened IMO, not sure why it would be a problem for anyone. Because it affects the integrity of the whole tournament? Imagine he worker rushed both games. No problem?
I don't care how he would have played out/thrown the games. He didn't, he forfeit in advance.
How does a forfeit affect the integrity of the whole tournament?
|
Bubble's hitlist:
- The Fan favorite coach of EG-TL
- a 14 year old boy.
- A person who has inexplicitable groin problems.
- A fan favorite player who's competing in his first LAN in ages
Up next: The only "random" player remaining in the tournament!
|
I should really found a team, spam open brackets with random master players and hire one good player who has a shot to win the whole thing. Of course the random master players would forfeit their matches against the team star. I will call my team sprout.
Best regards
DogZ
edit: Before someone flames, I do not mean this seriously but that could happen if forfeiting wouldn't be punished.
|
On June 30 2013 10:05 Boucot wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 10:04 Lukeeze[zR] wrote:On June 30 2013 10:02 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 10:01 simmeh wrote:
hmm disappointed with the kane/catz situation... not good for the integrity of competition :\ Exactly. I hope someone clarifies the situation soon. If it turns out to be true. Man it looks bad for Root. Wonder what MLG will do about it? Seems an obvious disqualification scenario. MLG won't do shit about it, they'll avoid any kind of controversy Go ARAM
That didn't end well for them
|
On June 30 2013 10:03 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 10:02 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 10:00 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:58 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:54 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:53 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both. Should have formulated that differently. What I'm trying to say: had they met in the semis Kane would already have had a great run(and CatZ too, ofc), now (an early round of the LB) it's just a case of a team manager getting out of the way of a team member, you could argue that Catz should not even have signed up with that premise, maybe, maybe not. You have basically just stated the problem and not given a reason why its ok. Its basically just me robbing a bank. You could argue that I shouldn't have even entered the building, maybe maybe not right? I'm genuinely confused as to what the problem is. (in the SC2 context) If it is true- he gave his team member a bye into the next round. This is not acceptable and is absolutely no different than if he played and deliberately threw the games. Which I assume everyone would have a problem with. What is the difference? @bold part: this is exactly what happened IMO, not sure why it would be a problem for anyone. Because it affects the integrity of the whole tournament? Imagine he worker rushed both games. No problem?
So, what if he just decided to catch Happy Hour at the local bar and forgot about the time of the matches? Would it be a problem then? If this is getting your panties in such a bunch, just imagine the MLG Admin gave him the wrong time.
|
On June 30 2013 10:04 Musicus wrote:
Bubbles defeated Coach Park, a 13yo and Nony... what is his plan?
To join the Dark Council with Hyvaa, Shine, Sniper, and soO.
|
On June 30 2013 10:05 Heouf wrote:
dammit Nony is the better player and still lost. Too bad. Nony deserved it.
Nony was floating 800 minerals and 1500 gas at the end. Had those resources been units, he would have won.
The better played definitely won.
|
Grubby vs TheStc on MLGSC2B
|
|
|
so, mlg still arent giving bubbles interviews at all.
very good of them to encourage all that talent flown in from kespa.
|
I Hope that Liquid or another team picks NonY up again. He played quite solidly this week. He needs some more motivation.
I believe NonY!!!
|
On June 30 2013 10:06 Laryleprakon wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 10:05 Boucot wrote:On June 30 2013 10:04 Lukeeze[zR] wrote:On June 30 2013 10:02 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 10:01 simmeh wrote:
hmm disappointed with the kane/catz situation... not good for the integrity of competition :\ Exactly. I hope someone clarifies the situation soon. If it turns out to be true. Man it looks bad for Root. Wonder what MLG will do about it? Seems an obvious disqualification scenario. MLG won't do shit about it, they'll avoid any kind of controversy Go ARAM That didn't end well for them
That went poorly for sure.
|
On June 30 2013 10:06 LighT. wrote:
Bubble's hitlist:
- The Fan favorite coach of EG-TL
- a 14 year old boy.
- A person who has inexplicitable groin problems.
- A fan favorite player who's competing in his first LAN in ages
Up next: The only "random" player in the tournament!
lol, kawaiirice ain't the only random player in the tournament.
|
On June 30 2013 10:06 xXFireandIceXx wrote:
fcking Bubbles
lol Bubbles is legit.
|
Time for KawaiiRice to clean up Bubbles. KAWAIIRICE FIGHTING
|
|
|
I really wanted to see Incontrol vs Bubbles 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
