EPTMLG Providence Day 3 Live Report Thread - Page 438
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Here we go again. This weekend is about good games and good fun. Don't rain on that parade. Play nice guys. Here's the very standard and friendly: - NO Balance Whine. - NO Player Bashing. - NO Caster Bashing. - NO BM whatsoever. Breaking these rules (from pg 166 forward) will be met with severe punishment. | ||
|
Awatsu
173 Posts
| ||
|
chatuka
1351 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:47 PinaryB wrote: MVP must be tired after those games vs mc and haypro dude like the st. louis cardinals. MVP is getting hot at the right time... 2011 Phillies= MMA. MVP is just getting started... and he is a better player than leenock. | ||
|
paschl
Germany666 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VaCm6.jpg) meh. but i think you see where im going with this. User was warned for this post | ||
|
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:45 Yaki wrote: lol MrBitter saying that the winner of this tournament is the best player in the world. He needs to learn that winning one tournament does not make one the best player, it's the consistency. so regardless of the outcome, MVP will still be the best players in the world after Providence. He's a caster, it's part of his job to sell the tournament. He can't be like, well this isn't the GSL so it doesn't really matter. Or he needs to win other high level tournaments that are competing with MLG for viewers like blah,blah blah. See. Artosis even said this is the best tournament in the world. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
MVP killed critter; leenock wins game. | ||
|
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
| ||
|
SeriouR
Spain622 Posts
| ||
|
emjaytron
Australia544 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:46 Fearest wrote: damn how many games did MVP played probably only a few more than leenock | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:47 s3rp wrote: Yeah there's only a few that didn't come from BW . Polt is like the only one that came from Wc3 though that actually won something. I believe you are correct actually :O Polt wasn't even a wc3 pro haha, just an amateur :p Polt so good... | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
and also, what constitutes an 'all in' these days? the way the term gets thrown around, in a lot of the cases I could easily see the game pan out even if it just did a decent amount of damage, so that ain't all in. It's virtually the exact same thing as a timing push, only whereas a supposed "all in" focuses less on followup and more on dealing damage in order to gain an edge, the timing attack would invest less in army and have a better followup but less potential for destroying shit. Where do you people even draw the line? Why is one worse than the other? And why in the name of god do people insist on calling things cheese that are clearly a reactionary response based on scouting intel? | ||
|
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
| ||
|
Tantaburs
Canada1825 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:47 julianto wrote: That's how it's been for the majority of the MLG's.... There are currently no player left who have been to every mlg. Nani has been to all but 1 MVP has been to 1 DRG has been to 2 Leenock has been to none | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:47 Telcontar wrote: I think he's implying that MC hasn't been taking his 3rd much in this tournament. I could be mistaken though. People need to remember, mvp is playing a ton of games. On top of that he has wrist problems. The shorter the game, the better for mvp. | ||
|
Iamyournoob
Germany595 Posts
Gogo, kid! (Hoping for some epic games though!!!) | ||
|
Mataru
Norway356 Posts
| ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:45 kodas wrote: You make us Protoss look bad, so please leave. Lol just looking at your post history you're a terran player. Don't put words in our mouth. That kind of fake race representation should be banned. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
Actually Leenock dropped to the lower bracket 1 round earlier than MVP, and MVP got a BYE in the first round of the open bracket. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
On November 21 2011 06:49 hifriend wrote: remind me why we care whether it was an all in again? and also, what constitutes an 'all in' these days? the way the term gets thrown around, in a lot of the cases I could easily see the game pan out even if it just did a decent amount of damage, so that ain't all in. It's virtually the exact same thing as a timing push, only whereas a supposed "all in" focuses less on followup and more on dealing damage in order to gain an edge, the timing attack would invest less in army and have a better followup but less potential for destroying shit. Where do you people even draw the line? Why is one worse than the other? And why in the name of good do people insist on calling things cheese that are clearly a reactionary response based on scouting intel? don't you dare inject reason into a live report thread | ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
| ||
