EPT
bring it back sheth!
NASL Week 5 Day 1 - Page 11
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
MonsieurGrimm
Canada2441 Posts
bring it back sheth! | ||
|
starfish
United States102 Posts
| ||
|
TigerKarl
1757 Posts
| ||
|
MajorityofOne
Canada2506 Posts
| ||
|
delo
United States333 Posts
LOL | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On May 12 2011 10:08 Mordiford wrote: I can't say that I don't think Moon is necessarily "certainly the better player", what? If every good player abuses the strengths of their race, what's the point of the word? I've never seen IdrA call a Zerg abusive. I agree with Idra because of results, who these players are winning/losing against, and how they are losing. You're entitled to your opinion, I just disagree with it. There is no point. "Abuse" is just recognition and application of your race's strengths. Idra is obviously biased in thinking Protoss' strengths are imba, but he knows their strengths nonetheless. He just thinks they are unfair. | ||
|
Maliris
Northern Ireland2557 Posts
 | ||
|
Aeo
United States113 Posts
| ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
| ||
|
Mailing
United States3087 Posts
They should fire him because he is obviously a zerg fanboy~ God you people bitch so much. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
 | ||
|
Sight-
184 Posts
| ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
| ||
|
Maliris
Northern Ireland2557 Posts
| ||
|
DaCruise
Denmark2457 Posts
| ||
|
Awesomeness
Germany1361 Posts
| ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
On May 12 2011 10:16 HolyArrow wrote: I personally hate the word "abusive" used to describe stuff in SC2. Its use really has no benefits, all it does is connote some sort of imbalance/cheapness when it's used to describe play. This game is about winning by any means possible. The word "abuse" has no place in a competitive game like SC2 where the rules are all defined by the game itself. The term "abusive style" just makes it sound like one player is bullying the other around in a dishonorable way, and paints a mental image of the "abused" player as some crying, whimpering, bruised individual, curled up in a corner somewhere. It's just a stupid word that's inappropriate for a competitive RTS, in my opinion. Abusive can equal smart. If my opennent double expands I can "abuse" that by doing a 4 gate. | ||
|
Maliris
Northern Ireland2557 Posts
| ||
|
AimForTheBushes
United States1760 Posts
On May 12 2011 10:16 HolyArrow wrote: I personally hate the word "abusive" used to describe stuff in SC2. Its use really has no benefits, all it does is connote some sort of imbalance/cheapness when it's used to describe play. This game is about winning by any means possible. The word "abuse" has no place in a competitive game like SC2 where the rules are all defined by the game itself. The term "abusive style" just makes it sound like one player is bullying the other around in a dishonorable way, and paints a mental image of the "abused" player as some crying, whimpering, bruised individual, curled up in a corner somewhere. It's just a stupid word that's inappropriate for a competitive RTS, in my opinion. Well, thank you for that opinion. It definitely helped me understand game 1 better. | ||
|
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On May 12 2011 10:13 1Eris1 wrote: Because it gives you a huge early economy and quick tech? Were you not listening at all? I have no idea why I bother arguing with one of the biggest Idra fanboys but no. That's not the case. Honestly if you want to put stuff in perspective like that every single build in Starcraft 2 is abusive. It's such a fucking retarded way to describe things. I guess he should have 4gated but that would have been abusive too. 3gate sentry expand is abusive too. | ||
| ||
