EPTOn April 04 2011 09:42 NexUmbra wrote:
PvP? The most micro intensive matchup? Korea vs Europe?
lul
PvP? The most micro intensive matchup? Korea vs Europe?
lul
Lol Korea vs Europe played on the NA server it would be interesting
[MLG] Dallas Day 3 - Page 838
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Stay on-topic please. Off-topic arguments derailing the thread will not be tolerated. Next spam post about eagles = ban. We get it, you're funny Take the eagle stuff here stop with the bw vs wc3 bullshit please | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
Lol Korea vs Europe played on the NA server it would be interesting | ||
|
Morthis
United States4 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:35 Redmark wrote: and why should he have a better start from a completely different series? It would just be luck based on who the other finalist turns out to be. Oh look added complexity and added randomness. Because it's a double elimination. In a typical single elimination, KiWi would already be gone and this argument would be pointless. Instead it's a double elimination, so a loser can still claw back to the championship round. That's the whole point, it's unfair if one player can lose a match and still win the tourney but the other one cannot. If KiWi was playing a single elimination, he'd simply be out and that'd be the end of it. He's given a second chance despite losing, so yes he's gonna have to deal with being at a disadvantage. | ||
|
TYJ.Aoy
Brazil1265 Posts
| ||
|
Radical
United States481 Posts
| ||
|
Zolid
United States228 Posts
| ||
|
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
| ||
|
lowkontrast
United States855 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:40 godemperor wrote: PvP is all micro so i guess naniwa>MC+latency Latency isn't felt on both sides in an RTS? I know in FPS having lag is bad for both players, in the non laggers' view, the lagger is skipping around making a shot impossible, but in the laggers' point of view, he sees everyone, along with himself, skipping around which makes it more consistent but also occur in first person and the player you're watching. | ||
|
Mellon
Sweden917 Posts
| ||
|
willeesmalls
United States477 Posts
| ||
|
LorDo
Sweden485 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:42 Essentia wrote: Has it been confirmed that MeatyOwlLegs is/was nani? yes. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45857 Posts
| ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:41 tnud wrote: 26-0 and I'll eat my T-shirt. same i will eat my shirt. 26 and 0 is unheard of. especially in sc2 which is known to be so volatile. actually 25-0 is good enough. i will eat my shirt now. | ||
|
Radical
United States481 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:43 TYJ.Aoy wrote: Anyone knows what happened to cruncher?Did he even play? Cruncher got eliminated pretty early on...I think on day 1. | ||
|
Ezze
Canada934 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:43 TYJ.Aoy wrote: Anyone knows what happened to cruncher?Did he even play? lost a pvp to fxoptikzero in the later rounds of the open bracket | ||
|
dpurple
Turkmenistan592 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:38 Node wrote: What I dislike about the extended series rule is the way it changes depending on who comes out of the losers bracket. If the loser's bracket winner isn't someone that the winner's bracket winner knocked out, there is no advantage given either way. If that's the case, why punish the player that lost to the winners bracket winner further? Well lets assume select had won vs kiwi. Then its naniwa in the final vs select who he just knocked out 2-0 in his last game. With no advantage that dont seem right to me. | ||
|
FinBenton
Finland870 Posts
| ||
|
dmans
Sweden358 Posts
| ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:42 Essentia wrote: Has it been confirmed that MeatyOwlLegs is/was nani? yes | ||
|
Seohce
United Kingdom394 Posts
| ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:42 bkrow wrote: Lol Korea vs Europe played on the NA server it would be interesting Finals are played from TL HQ in NYC. | ||
| ||
