This is the greatest thing. I can't wait!!!
TSL3 Bracket Show / Qualifier Tiebreaker Match - Page 48
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Jayson X
Switzerland2431 Posts
This is the greatest thing. I can't wait!!! | ||
ptz
Romania251 Posts
mondi vs zeerax ret vs nani nestea vs goody idra vs cruncher | ||
integral
United States3156 Posts
![]() | ||
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:06 nekuodah wrote: Wow.... just wow.... two high GSL finishes is over rated? ok We should put side bets up then lol | ||
wopaahh
150 Posts
| ||
DumEN
Sweden123 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:06 GenoZStriker wrote: Are we seriously getting all Zergs invite on one side of the bracket? IdrA, Ret and Nestea. There are 5 zerg invites, and 2 sides of the bracket, a 3/2 split is the fairest split possible. | ||
YoungNeil
Canada328 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:05 Eury wrote: No. Jinro is really overrated and Morrow was a much better Terran than him and he is just getting stronger and stronger as Zerg. Also 1.3 will most likely be out by then, and hopefully it will help Zerg a bit in the matchup. Jinro's record against IdrA is 7-3. I would say that he's severely favoured against MorroW, a Zerg who's certainly not as good as IdrA. Whether or not you think Jinro is overrated (Ro4, Ro4, Ro16, nbd), his actual record suggests very strongly that he should be able to take out MorroW. | ||
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:08 integral wrote: starting to get sick of the same background music every time, heh. amazing quality production, just something to learn from next time. ![]() can anybody tell me the name of the song ? ![]() | ||
NPF
Canada1635 Posts
Those are the last 8. Just think... Nuts | ||
politik
409 Posts
| ||
templar rage
United States2509 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:08 DumEN wrote: There are 5 zerg invites, and 2 sides of the bracket, a 3/2 split is the fairest split possible. Well, 3 Zerg invites in the same quarter kind of sucks, but that's the way it turned out. | ||
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
Best compliment ever ![]() | ||
Fweedman
United States25 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:08 TRAP[yoo] wrote: can anybody tell me the name of the song ? ![]() The XX - Intro | ||
Hider
Denmark9390 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:07 CCow wrote: I have, honestly, not seen a single terran who plays such a solid macro-style as Jinro does. Morrow's success as terran was based mostly on being able to abuse the 5rax reapers perfectly, which won him IEM. T_T; Keep telling everybody that, and other ignorant people might believe you. | ||
polarity
53 Posts
On March 06 2011 06 CCow wrote: I have, honestly, not seen a single terran who plays such a solid macro-style as Jinro does. Morrow's success as terran was based mostly on being able to abuse the 5rax reapers perfectly, which won him IEM. T_T; Ridiculous claim of someone who must have not followed the european scene at all. | ||
LeFroMaGe
United States628 Posts
| ||
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
And hasu playing insane PvT finals, such insane control. | ||
chrisolo
Germany2606 Posts
| ||
DiaBoLuS
Germany1638 Posts
hasu 2-0 tlo(p) hasu rapes anyone in pvp. he is the player with the most talent in europe, playing the least of all. no fanboiism, its just true. HuK is unsolid as hell in my opinion - even if he might be a bit overall atm. + Artosis saying he has respect for Nighend: he saw nightend playing. lolol. Nightend is by far weaker than hasu, socke, naniwa or white-ra. | ||
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
On March 06 2011 06:08 YoungNeil wrote: Jinro's record against IdrA is 7-3. I would say that he's severely favoured against MorroW, a Zerg who's certainly not as good as IdrA. Whether or not you think Jinro is overrated (Ro4, Ro4, Ro16, nbd), his actual record suggests very strongly that he should be able to take out MorroW. I do not endorse this statement as my own Eury, just a heads up lol. Obviously it's been shown that Morrows weakest matchup is ZvZ and ZvT is his best, and tlhough we haven't seen a lot out of Jinro's TvZ, he's not one to beat around the bush about big matches. I'll still put my money on Jinro. | ||
| ||