|
On March 03 2011 02:10 ftd.rain wrote: "tiny micro decisions" ?Socke got hammered micro wise, he simply had too much.
I believe you should download the replay and watch again, his micro wasn't worse than Squirtles.
|
|
|
Is cebit closed already for today and they play without audience?
|
Socke seems to have the strongest mental state atm.
|
On March 03 2011 02:11 silentsaint wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2011 02:09 bHLURGEN wrote: Its amazing how socke can make 100 mistakes in one game and then go on and play a perfect game, so inconsistent. Maybe he isn't use to play long macro games. It just seemed like there where so many things going on at the same time in that game that he could not do everything at once. It was a little bit like sanZenith against Nestea with the difference that those two actually could be everywhere at once ;-) He's played plenty of great macro games. His nerves were clearly getting to him, it happens. When you catch yourself doing mistakes it doesn't exactly help your play that game either.
|
|
On March 03 2011 02:11 skipgamer wrote:can someone explain why they don't just do ![[image loading]](http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/715/tiebreakexample.jpg) ?
because all 3 players are equal. There is no way to put one player ahead of the others by putting him in the second game.
|
On March 03 2011 02:12 esperanto wrote: Is cebit closed already for today and they play without audience? ye^^
|
On March 03 2011 02:12 Stylus wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2011 02:10 Vathus wrote:On March 03 2011 02:08 Stylus wrote: So someone has to win 3 games in a row? That's terrible, winning 2 in a row accomplishes the same thing but makes this shorter. 3 in a row could go on all night. No they only need 2 in a row. The reason socke needs 3 is because his game against sjow was part of the first tie breaking set but they all tied again so they reset it. So Sjow wins, then the series is reset and he has to win 2 more? I'm confused, why is IEM so confusing.
no..
a players needs to win 2 games in a row to pass.. thats just it
|
sjow seems like he just wants to get outta this tie break situation, hope that it doesnt translate into sloppy play
|
FIRST TIEBREAKER:
Squirtle > Socke Sjow > Squirtle Socke > Sjow
SECOND TIEBREAKER:
Socke > Squirtle
|
On March 03 2011 02:12 TazzDingo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2011 02:10 ftd.rain wrote: "tiny micro decisions" ?Socke got hammered micro wise, he simply had too much. What? squirtle's 3 stalkers were 10x more efficient than socke's much larger force, is what he's saying
|
On March 03 2011 02:11 skipgamer wrote:can someone explain why they don't just do ![[image loading]](http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/715/tiebreakexample.jpg) ?
Because the loser of game 1 could potentially beat the 3rd person, meaning they are not technically the worst.
|
On March 03 2011 02:12 GizmoPT wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2011 02:12 Stylus wrote:On March 03 2011 02:10 Vathus wrote:On March 03 2011 02:08 Stylus wrote: So someone has to win 3 games in a row? That's terrible, winning 2 in a row accomplishes the same thing but makes this shorter. 3 in a row could go on all night. No they only need 2 in a row. The reason socke needs 3 is because his game against sjow was part of the first tie breaking set but they all tied again so they reset it. So Sjow wins, then the series is reset and he has to win 2 more? I'm confused, why is IEM so confusing. no.. a players needs to win 2 games in a row to pass.. thats just it
Socke has won 2 games in a row.
Or am I just completely lost and out of this?
|
i like how they are sitting alone in that huge ass dark hall
|
On March 03 2011 02:13 Jinsho wrote: FIRST TIEBREAKER:
Squirtle > Socke Sjow > Squirtle Socke > Sjow
SECOND TIEBREAKER:
Socke > Squirtle thx man
|
I cant believe i'm cheering for a Terran right now. Let's go Sjow I want another tie breaker.
|
Nothing will ever be more epic then that game. Nothing
|
Is it a best of 5 in the quarter finals? Then I say let all three advance and have them taking turns against Idra!
|
|
|
|