(2) Warfield

Post a Reply

th0t

Poland36 Posts

December 16 2013 23:43 GMT

Map Overwiev:
+ Show Spoiler +

(2) Warfield
[image loading]

Other images
+ Show Spoiler +

Map Analyzer:

+ Show Spoiler +

Uploaded on EU

Playable size 131x131

TheFish7

United States2824 Posts

December 17 2013 00:24 GMT

Neat-o, I like the general design philosophy and the aesthetics. The map looks a lot more open in the overview than in the analyzer image. I'm not sure how much I'm digging the narrow path between nat and 3rd base, seems like its only use is to lock a zerg out from defending their 3rd using the rocks or a forcefield. Its hard to tell what is going on with that doodad at the 3rd base also. Close by air is fun so I guess since this is super close by air, then that means this will be super fun.

neobowman

Canada3324 Posts

December 17 2013 01:04 GMT

The deco is sexysexysexy.

At first glance, I didn't like how the distances between the two bases were so long. Makes for boring gameplay. But the thirds are surprisingly far away. At the same time, they're expanding away from the opponent. I like that. Makes it more difficult to defend against harass and small cutesy aggression but big pushes are much easier to deal with, which gives it the best part of having short rush distances without the big disadvantages.

I also like how the expansions are a bit more clustered around the edges of the map. Forces players to expand towards there.

I think the gold expansion in the middle could be a bit more choked off. Considering its position in the centre of the map and as a neutral base, I think it could have just two small paths on either side, one for each player, and still be easily attackable. As it is now, it seems a bit too vulnerable.

Please or register to reply.

(2) Warfield

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming