EPT
TSL 2v2? Would you join?
| Forum Index > Razer TSL Forum |
|
Elite]v[arine
United States264 Posts
| ||
|
Elite]v[arine
United States264 Posts
| ||
|
BuGzlToOnl
United States5918 Posts
 | ||
|
Elite]v[arine
United States264 Posts
| ||
|
Steelflight-Rx
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
drug_vict1m
844 Posts
On June 21 2008 06:17 Steelflight-Rx wrote: i would definately join, and watch all the games, and buy razer products. rofl | ||
|
NotSupporting
Sweden1998 Posts
| ||
|
Coulthard
Greece3359 Posts
| ||
|
yubee
United States3826 Posts
| ||
|
Kingsp4de20
United States716 Posts
| ||
|
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
| ||
|
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
On June 21 2008 06:13 X.xDeMoNiCx.X wrote: wow that was a fast repl T_T i literally just pressed post. ^^ I would join if I was any good at 2v2, but I'll still have the feeds open and watch them, no doubt about it. | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
Centric
United States1989 Posts
| ||
|
Vasoline73
United States7834 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
On June 21 2008 07:15 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: it is now though! fakesteve is like jacob from Lost | ||
|
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
| ||
|
nemY
United States3119 Posts
there will be interest... | ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
| ||
|
Straylight
Canada706 Posts
On June 21 2008 09:57 thunk wrote: Maybe a 2v2 invitational would be a better option, but there aren't more than 2 or 3 famous 2v2 teams. You'd have a job finding 8 2v2 teams that everyone would enjoy watching. Well a good way to find other quality 2v2 teams would be a ladder stage I think. Then you get the mix of unknown / known teams in the elimination round. | ||
|
ZhenMiChan
Netherlands1181 Posts
but the must limit one player to one team so its not like i pay jeadong 50$ and he joins my team and im on top for fam3 :D and after he joins 300 more teamz for 50$ im tired | ||
|
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
born-to-porn
Denmark400 Posts
| ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
i don't even watch that show he better not be the fat dumb guy  | ||
|
DragoonPK
3259 Posts
LOL | ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
| ||
|
50CaL.AngeL
Canada69 Posts
| ||
|
TaP.SoL
United States38 Posts
| ||
|
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
On June 21 2008 19:00 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: i don't even watch that show he better not be the fat dumb guy Dont worry Fakesteve Jacob isnt a fat dumb guy  | ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
|
Red.Cloud
Canada235 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
Steelflight-Rx
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
CDRdude
United States5625 Posts
| ||
|
LucasWoJ
United States936 Posts
On June 21 2008 07:15 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: it is now though! Happy Birthday! | ||
|
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
On June 22 2008 10:21 Xeris wrote: lol the TL.net sheep are so funny , once one guy starts 2v2 tournament everyones like "OMG 2v2! YA DO 2v2 TSL" lol ;o so silly. lol that's what I was thinking | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
lol. | ||
|
MyStiC_Chaos
United States499 Posts
On June 22 2008 13:29 Xeris wrote: its just funny how people dont talk about 2v2 for like the past 3-4 years, and now all of a sudden there's like "2v2 TSL GOGO??" thread and "2v2 practice group" threads popping up lol. I've always wanted to 2vs2 but I've seen people say it's too boring -_- | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
this is the kind of "sheep" mentality I was referring to -.-; | ||
|
Superiorwolf
United States5509 Posts
On June 22 2008 13:48 MyStiC_Chaos wrote: I've always wanted to 2vs2 but I've seen people say it's too boring -_- If you can't think for yourself how are you even playing Starcraft in the first place? You find out yourself by trying it out, not by listening to others and taking their words as facts. Xeris nailed this one. On June 22 2008 10:55 Steelflight-Rx wrote: NO ITS just that 2v2 is fun, and imo fun to watch. it is really a cool untapped part of starcraft, you see a lot of cool/innovative strats in 2v2 that you dont see so much in 1v1 I agree. Nowadays with the huge macro games we see, 1v1 has changed a lot since the old days of mega micro intensive games that where always exciting and intense. 2v2 still retains this mentality of aggression and micro, however, that's why I like playing it and watching it as well! Plus, some people say DMZ was bad, but imo if a map with really short positions like that was implemented again, I would like it, because even as such a bad map it provided extremely entertaining games sometimes, because of all the hyper aggression with rushes and stuff. I love 2v2!!! <3 On June 21 2008 15:38 Ancestral wrote: Clearly we just need a foreign Proleague. iirc this was attempted and there were teams, but eventually people just stopped showing up. @op - Yes, I would be for this, but it would be watched far less than the 1v1, therefore a 2v2 TSL is not exactly feasible. | ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
A nice 8 man invitational tournament could be nice though, maybe 4 invite and 4 earned spots with a qualifier or something? Nothing too spectacular. But if they were to do that i would attempt to play and would most certainly watch. | ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
highly unlikely but an invitational would be cool. | ||
|
knf
Sweden282 Posts
| ||
|
Steelflight-Rx
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
We've had 'pro leagues' for ages now like WGTCL. There are many active 2v2 players. | ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On June 23 2008 00:37 Steelflight-Rx wrote: why would it have to be invitational? a ladder wouldnt be totally possible. Some of the top players in the TSL were relatively unknown and probably wouldnt have had a chance if it was invite only. that statement couldn't be more wrong. there were no real unknowns in TSL.. if you are familiar with the foreign scene, which obviously much of TL.net is not, then you would have known all the players. for example... Dinot has been really good for about a year now, Brat was always really good but was inactive for a period, Iefnaij has been good forever, Dreiven has been monstrous in the past 6 months etc, Rondo has recently got real good... so really there weren't too many surprise names. | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5529 Posts
| ||
|
Craixs
Denmark170 Posts
I think if mondragon and testie played together they would win but if they got random partners I doubt they would be good enough to carry their partner | ||
|
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
On June 26 2008 06:59 Craixs wrote: Then it should be with randoms partners like in wc3 ladder 2on2.. I think if mondragon and testie played together they would win but if they got random partners I doubt they would be good enough to carry their partner no that would be worse | ||
|
50Cal.Fearless
Australia15 Posts
| ||
|
qrs
United States3637 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
I would follow it really close regardless of map pool.  | ||
|
d.arkive
United States843 Posts
| ||
|
Goosey
United States695 Posts
| ||
|
50Cal.Fearless
Australia15 Posts
| ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9107 Posts
That said.... not even a bit of hype yet for TSL 2? Lets get it going before summer is over so people can play and not worry about school!!!! | ||
|
G5
United States2921 Posts
| ||
|
lokiM
United States3407 Posts
On June 21 2008 06:49 yubee wrote: no | ||
|
coltrane
Chile988 Posts
so, if tl.net make a ladder on iccup with a brackets final... im in. | ||
|
Get.WhistleR
Norway16 Posts
| ||
|
50Cal.Fearless
Australia15 Posts
| ||
|
gosuagre
Chile1 Post
| ||
|
No_eL
Chile1438 Posts
| ||
|
AdamBanks
Canada996 Posts
2x the rushing 2x the cheese 2x the sexiness | ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
Actually, on second thought, you probably don't even need the cash. If it says TSL, then people will come. And play. And buy razer products (did you know that their 5.1 surround sound headphones do nothing for sc? ^_^ ) | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
I like 2v2. I did have a partner and we made it to D+ but I haven't heard of him for awhile. Oh well! | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32130 Posts
| ||
|
OmgIRok
Taiwan2699 Posts
| ||
| ||
