|
On November 28 2020 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2020 08:39 Trfel wrote: Voted for Jockmcplop for now anyway, as I'm much more confident in him being mafia. Probably okay with consolidating on Vivax if needed Show nested quote +On November 28 2020 07:37 Trfel wrote: I wouldn't be too sad if Fecalfeast is lynched Show nested quote +On November 28 2020 09:13 Trfel wrote:On November 28 2020 09:06 Tictock wrote: Phone posting and my keyboard is acting up (thing my case puts pressure on the screen sometimes and my keyboard glitches out). So going into lurker mode as typing sucks Noooo, talk to me..... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" @ShoCkeyy, why are you changing votes (assuming you are)? I know you said you can see both Jockmcplop and Vivax as mafia, but it's hard for me to see you actually caring about who gets lynched, you just seem to be willing to vote for whoever thread sentiment is against. On one hand it's good to be willing to consolidate in a majority lynch game, on the other hand it seems suspect to not even care... There is this dude who just did that. Trfel. Then there is this dude who openly claimed to basically doing that. Well unfortunately it doesn't make him mafia, maybe it could make shockeyy mafia instead?? the plot thickens! Sorry, I'm not completely sure if I understand this post. I'm being accused of doing what I am "accusing" ShoCkeyy of? Which is not caring about who gets lynched, instead following thread sentiment.
As I said, it's difficult in a majority lynch game, as we need five votes on the same person by tomorrow's deadline or there is a no lynch. I would much prefer to have a lynch on a suboptimal target than a no lynch.
I have been trying to balance my clear desire to have Jockmcplop lynched with the need to compromise. I think I've been doing a good job of balancing these goals, but I suppose that's for you to judge. I believe my preferences have always been made clear.
|
On November 28 2020 10:05 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2020 09:13 Trfel wrote:On November 28 2020 09:06 Tictock wrote: Phone posting and my keyboard is acting up (thing my case puts pressure on the screen sometimes and my keyboard glitches out). So going into lurker mode as typing sucks Noooo, talk to me..... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" @ShoCkeyy, why are you changing votes (assuming you are)? I know you said you can see both Jockmcplop and Vivax as mafia, but it's hard for me to see you actually caring about who gets lynched, you just seem to be willing to vote for whoever thread sentiment is against. On one hand it's good to be willing to consolidate in a majority lynch game, on the other hand it seems suspect to not even care... Jock doesn’t scum read anybody this game. He slightly hints that you and I are mafia somehow. He pushes for Grack as mayor, although this isn’t alignment indicative, but rather push Grack after ignoring how 3p his first post was. Those are enough for me to vote Jock. ShoCkeyy, weren't all of these things true earlier when you voted for Vivax instead of Jockmcplop? Please explain?
|
On November 28 2020 11:33 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2020 11:25 Trfel wrote:On November 28 2020 10:05 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 28 2020 09:13 Trfel wrote:On November 28 2020 09:06 Tictock wrote: Phone posting and my keyboard is acting up (thing my case puts pressure on the screen sometimes and my keyboard glitches out). So going into lurker mode as typing sucks Noooo, talk to me..... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" @ShoCkeyy, why are you changing votes (assuming you are)? I know you said you can see both Jockmcplop and Vivax as mafia, but it's hard for me to see you actually caring about who gets lynched, you just seem to be willing to vote for whoever thread sentiment is against. On one hand it's good to be willing to consolidate in a majority lynch game, on the other hand it seems suspect to not even care... Jock doesn’t scum read anybody this game. He slightly hints that you and I are mafia somehow. He pushes for Grack as mayor, although this isn’t alignment indicative, but rather push Grack after ignoring how 3p his first post was. Those are enough for me to vote Jock. ShoCkeyy, weren't all of these things true earlier when you voted for Vivax instead of Jockmcplop? Please explain? What’s there to explain? I’m consolidating my vote, both are viable targets for me. There’s hardly any substance to Jock over Vivax. Yeah okay, I get that. I find some of the way you said things weird and the way you answered my questions a bit weird but I get it, I'll drop it. Thanks.
|
On November 28 2020 12:32 Hapahauli wrote:Hey guys - Thanksgiving with the family has gotten a lot more busy than I anticipated. I'm just not going to have any time to play today. I'll have some time before the deadline to do a quick skim and drop a vote... that's about it unfortunately data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" ##Vote: Hapahauli
(seriously though, hope time with the family has been good!) (ps vote for Jockmcplop)
|
On November 28 2020 13:22 Fecalfeast wrote: hi Hey. What's up?
Game seems interesting, but slow Just waiting for the Europeans to wake up I suppose.
|
On November 28 2020 13:23 Fecalfeast wrote: I feel like I'm a pretty good kill here yet only rayn wants to do it, i have to figure out what that means Because Jockmcplop is super scummy, in my case anyway.
|
He said he just got off a 16 hour shift, in my opinion he's earned a break and some rest. Mafia can come later. I won't criticize him for not really expanding on his scumread of me or stuff like that.
That said, raynpelikoneet, if I did something to upset you, I'm sorry. I never said I was good at this game or pretended to be good at this game, I'm just trying my best and trying to help everyone have fun. I never meant to offend you in any way.
|
On November 28 2020 19:32 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2020 07:40 Trfel wrote: I dunno what to think about Vivax. I am still not completely sold on Hapahauli's reasons for Vivax being mafia, and I think Vivax's response to those reasons was actually decent. But there were some other things I didn't like: Vivax seemed to be accusing Hapahauli the whole time and then ended with "but you're blue" which seems odd to me? But not out of the realm of possibility. And secondly, Vivax didn't seem to do much at all besides defend himself, which I found quite underwhelming.
I'll take another look at Vivax's filter. And I dunno what you are reading because I pointed out the Jock thing at the same time. This post is a lot of waffle and tbh I still have to look at what rayn has been saying about you. I don't think I ever called your alignment wrong though. Yeah you are right, that wasn't an accurate statement. It was an impression I had that was untrue. My apologies.
|
Sorry, I am here. I don't really have any new thoughts, I'll take another look at what raynpelikoneet is saying about Jockmcplop but he still seems like mafia to me so I dunno...
|
Hm.
Sorry
|
ShoCkeyy, you still around?
|
So, reading Tictock's filter.On November 24 2020 14:09 Tictock wrote: If I had to shoot anyone right now (who has posted) I would kill FF. On November 25 2020 00:28 Tictock wrote:Going to get some sleep finnaly. This is the post that makes me want to lynch FF He had made several posts before this, so why is he making apologies and excuses. His next post even suggests he remembered he was running for mayor. Except, the issue is that the post quoted happened in between these two posts from Tictock (link). So then, Tictock is maybe just making up a reason later to justify his scumread when the reason didn't previously exist.... Or, he had some other reason to kill Fecalfeast.
Tictock?
|
Furthermore, @Tictock, why did you stop scumreading Hapahauli? While we're at it, same question but for Vivax? You included him in your "yolo scumteam," but then seem to have POE'd him as town? Though you never really mentioned that as a scumread otherwise. Just trying to see where your head is at...
|
Vivax, you want to talk about anything? I'm around, just feeling very lost after the Jockmcplop flip. Slowly rereading all filters.
|
On November 29 2020 05:27 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2020 05:22 Trfel wrote: Vivax, you want to talk about anything? I'm around, just feeling very lost after the Jockmcplop flip. Slowly rereading all filters. I'll await a few comments on the flip and then see what happens at night. Either way my motivation to do stuff should be low not knowing if I'm around tomorrow and with less info than post-night. At most it's odd how Hapa left me off the hook so easily there. Felt like I was his biggest committment in the game. But if you're not around tomorrow, isn't that more incentive to try and help out tonight then?
|
On November 25 2020 08:57 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2020 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 25 2020 08:41 Fecalfeast wrote: Hi I'm working weird hours I'm here now what's up i have 30 mins max before bed time. where is your head at? Kill Tictock if I got mayor most likely, shockeyy maybe instead Slam still town, grack still scumlean for trying hard with his campaign with honestly the same logic as shockeyy ironically You seem towny enough too This post seems quite suspect to me.
Fecalfeast says that Grackaroni is a scumlean for trying hard with his campaign, and that that's the same reason he's suspicious of ShoCkeyy too. However, ShoCkeyy didn't try hard with his campaign, by this time he had already stopped campaigning. And his campaign lasted a whole three posts. However, this isn't that helpful as all it proves is that Fecalfeast didn't read carefully, but we already knew that.
The interesting part for me is that Fecalfeast is townreading Alakaslam because he's having fun. But why isn't he scumreading him for trying hard with his mayoral campaign? Shouldn't that affect his read on Alakaslam the exact same way it did for Grackaroni and ShoCkeyy?
|
On November 29 2020 05:48 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2020 05:32 Trfel wrote:On November 25 2020 08:57 Fecalfeast wrote:On November 25 2020 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 25 2020 08:41 Fecalfeast wrote: Hi I'm working weird hours I'm here now what's up i have 30 mins max before bed time. where is your head at? Kill Tictock if I got mayor most likely, shockeyy maybe instead Slam still town, grack still scumlean for trying hard with his campaign with honestly the same logic as shockeyy ironically You seem towny enough too This post seems quite suspect to me. Fecalfeast says that Grackaroni is a scumlean for trying hard with his campaign, and that that's the same reason he's suspicious of ShoCkeyy too. However, ShoCkeyy didn't try hard with his campaign, by this time he had already stopped campaigning. And his campaign lasted a whole three posts. However, this isn't that helpful as all it proves is that Fecalfeast didn't read carefully, but we already knew that. The interesting part for me is that Fecalfeast is townreading Alakaslam because he's having fun. But why isn't he scumreading him for trying hard with his mayoral campaign? Shouldn't that affect his read on Alakaslam the exact same way it did for Grackaroni and ShoCkeyy? Mostly I don't know why he thinks Grack was trying too hard. But I don't know why you think that's the same reason he scumread Shockeyy for. Fecalfeast said "Grackaroni scumlean for trying too hard on his campaign with honestly the same logic as ShoCkeyy ironically." Which to me reads like he's scumreading ShoCkeyy and Grackaroni for the same reasoning. But I guess I could be wrong, it's not a super clear sentence to me.
|
ShoCkeyy, can you please do something that's alignment indicative?
|
And Vivax, I don't believe you ever responded to my comments yesterday? Specifically, when did you actually catch up with the thread and start to have solid reads?
|
On November 29 2020 09:35 Tictock wrote: Damn, that sucks.
I talked about my Hapa read with you already Trfel? Plus the roleblock thing seemed legit, even though you could argue Hapa was using that as cover to dodge the game. It's a weird time though and we just lynched a townie who had disappeared so prob not a good metric. Yes, my apologies, this makes sense. Do you have any thoughts on my other question, about your read on Fecalfeast?On November 29 2020 05:17 Trfel wrote:So, reading Tictock's filter. Show nested quote +On November 24 2020 14:09 Tictock wrote: If I had to shoot anyone right now (who has posted) I would kill FF. Show nested quote +On November 25 2020 00:28 Tictock wrote:Going to get some sleep finnaly. This is the post that makes me want to lynch FF On November 24 2020 17:28 Fecalfeast wrote: i forgot sorry hi what's up He had made several posts before this, so why is he making apologies and excuses. His next post even suggests he remembered he was running for mayor. Except, the issue is that the post quoted happened in between these two posts from Tictock ( link). So then, Tictock is maybe just making up a reason later to justify his scumread when the reason didn't previously exist.... Or, he had some other reason to kill Fecalfeast. Tictock?
|
|
|
|