EPT[T][M] Resistance VI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Like in voice I think no one was intent to oppose anyone on the first team anyway, when we played. It was mostly just seeing if it fails or not, there wasn't anything to discuss. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 27 2017 08:00 Chairman Ray wrote: So, what do you guys want to do? I want to go on a mission cause I'm resistance and need to fight a bunch of other people who will say that they are also resistance cause reasons. I think you are not resistance cause you looked at me funny, what do you say. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 27 2017 09:07 Half the Sky wrote: Evening lovelies, I’m resistance too, but surely someone in this bunch is capable of saying that, or frankly anything posted so far, as either alignment.  And LOL Tina, sleep is for the weak To add to the setup discussion, as someone who has played resistance before in forum and real life, I do agree with the points made by Ray, but for people new to this game, should mission 1 pass, do not assume that all three members on mission 1 are part of the resistance. At least in my experience, there’s been far too many times where people don’t re-examine the first three people and then for mission 2, they hyper-focus on player 4 that becomes the add-on. Spy on first mission makes it pass, gets another assignment and the fail getting attributed to the newcomer is a possibility. On January 27 2017 09:11 Chairman Ray wrote: I say rubbish! I looked at you funny because Austrians are not to be trusted. Anyways, if you are not selected on the first mission, who would you be okay with? No one in particular yet. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
But here ye silent presence, I gave you something to read. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 27 2017 22:56 RtaniSoul wrote: this may actually be were i begin to townread you. without lex's blessing but whatevs xP he's too busy playing heroes. i think. i'm supposed to be studying >> this is why i don't mafia anymore lol What are you studying now? Also try stealing his ethernet cable when he does that he isn't allowed to play anything but resistance now. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Superbia Silverika seems fine to me though. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
You seem R cause gut feeling. Superbia seems R cause he seems to be plaing to the best of his abilities which is a good indicator. Also liked his read on me but that's a more subjective reason. RtaniSoul seem derpy and too hung up on sending themselves. I suspect them of being S while sending two R along with them. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote: Why would they not send themselves on their own mission?? I'd find it pretty strange to exclude themselves during the first selection. It's always safe to send yourself cuz of the "i know im town argument" duh. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Seems like a stupid question tbh, both alignments want that, and that's why I don't want that. So no, I won't suggest myself when I nominate unless others widely recognized my alignment. For the information value. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 04:32 RtaniSoul wrote: ...yeah actually i will discuss it. what, exactly, makes it better for you as 'town' to not be part of a team that ends up sabotaging rather than to be part of the team? except to not be included in the resulting suspicion, anyway Cause if we accept self nomination widely any spy can include themselves for no reason other than "im town duh". I want leaders to have a better reason than that. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Aggressively pushing a specific team is very much spy play. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 05:33 RtaniSoul wrote: who would you have go on the mission other than us? Dunno yet :> But secretly you wish I would say: myself | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
As resistance, why would you care so much that someone is hung up on not sending a specific person? | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 06:01 RtaniSoul wrote: take off your viva tinfoil hat for a moment and put on rsoul shoes...a viva comes along saying something that doesn't make a lick of sense and says nothing else. what conclusions do you come to? that's why i'm pushing you who else wouldn't you send? Anyone besides silverika and superbia for the moment. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 06:17 RtaniSoul wrote: lol >< okay, so you're doing a smash-up job at useless right now. let's try a different tact what do you think of the cheerleader guy whose name i can't remember that replaced in for...i think it was chairman ray? i'm not asking alignment; i'm asking analysis The analysis is that he seems to not be concerned about that team being infiltrated and that could make him spy. Makes sense with you being on that team. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://i.imgflip.com/7rwyj.jpg) | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote: can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani Reading between the lines this means that you're fine with superbia and swika but not fine with me not being fine with rtanisoul? | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On January 28 2017 09:35 Grackaroni wrote: I liked his confident (and correct) put down of Vivax's leader logic. His follow up also seems genuine to me. If he had entered the thread with that comment as scum, I would have expected him to use that as justification for having more suspicion/uncertainty on Vivax. This is really good Gracky. I think you can both go to town pile. | ||
| ||
