|
On January 30 2017 03:55 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2017 03:53 sharkie wrote:On January 30 2017 02:20 Tumblewood wrote:On January 30 2017 01:54 sharkie wrote: I will reject the team, don't like it. for once in your life could you explain why you don't like the team I don't like your attitude. i'd also like why you don't like that group, sharkie, if it's not too much to ask
Sure since you ask nicely. Well - it's not the team I want (the team you nominated I felt really good about getting information I need) - all of them voted against the first team (is only a remark, not a reason against the team) - I don't trust Tumblewood, he is way too pushy and hostile to people who don't agree with him.
and my biggest reason is I don't know what to think about all three of them so if the mission fails I am as smart as I am now.
|
Oh god calix is next leader, can we afford that?
|
oh scum = spy
I kept wondering why you guys call me names (scum) but in fact you only meant to label me a spy.
|
I don't think any player has done anything to be labelled as a spy so far...
Most of your "reads" can be used for either side. Also apart from Silverika (who actually voted for the team unlike the spies who did not want the team), no one has done anything to call himself rebel either.
|
At least we got a replacement.
|
How has Grackaroni suddenly turned out to be everyone's darling? ^^ (second nomination in a row)
Want to explain your team selection, emperor? You are labeled a spy by everyone after all.
|
On January 31 2017 18:50 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2017 18:48 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote: Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo Nope Care to elaborate?
Everyone thinks you are a spy
|
On February 01 2017 01:51 sicklucker wrote: does no one wanna send me .....?
Welcome to the club...
I will reject any team with tumble or super on it. Their back and forth annoys me to no end, plus they also both suspect me a spy because I apparently was in favour of a "all town" team and wanted to get credit for it...? Getting credit for a vote for teams is ridicilous in the first place and if it was all town why did you reject it then? o.O
I trust silver the most (because as I mentioned they voted for a team all spies were against for). Anyone else I am neutral towards.
|
the day of my leadership is nearing :D
|
On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote: the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie?
Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels
|
On February 01 2017 07:27 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote: the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels We just can't understand you. As far as I can tell you think that Tumble is too pushy. You like Silverwolf because she voted for the first team. And you really liked the first team. But we have no idea why you like that team so much aside from "there's 6 rebels and only 3 spies", which is true for any team.
I just felt good about the people at that time. It's the first team with no information, that's all about your feeling only. Obviously, that has changed now. I don't want Super in a team anymore.
On February 01 2017 07:28 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote: the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels technically but what i meant is what do you think about who is resistance and who is a spy?
- Silver is resistance, would need some major changes to change my opinion about that. You I feel good towards too. - E/C is a spy for me because he offered us way too many possibilities for a team. That's a big "Hey, I let you guys decide what you want. Just like me please!" - sicklucker had my benefit of doubt till his weird drunk posts... You guys kept accusing people spies because they don't try hard enough - his behaviour reflects that a lot. - Tumble/Super - one of them is my third possible spy. I just don't know which one of them. Maybe there is a scenario where both of them are spies and they go the route of playing totally against each other I don't know (what I don't believe as that would also make sicklucker resistance).
The rest are resistance by process of elimination.
|
My analysis of the last day:
- On February 01 2017 13:23 Vivax wrote: Morning gents.
Today I want to see superbia and TW fighting as they both distrust each other yet as spies they should want the team to pass.
Looking forward to their reasoning for the respective vote.
I really want to highlight this post. This was the first time we had our two resident debaters on the same team and just like vivax I was looking forward to their posts to this team nomination. However, neither posted anything about this team and chose the safe way out (rejecting the team). Now I am sure both people will come up with some excuse why yesterday was the day they could not post a lot. But this is way too much coincidence for me as if either had been town they would have surely spoken up and gave us their thoughts about being on the same team. So for me the suspicion of both rose up quite a lot after yesterday.
- My next point or question is "wtf silver?" Why did you approve of this team nomination of EC? I thought we were in agreement that EC is very suspicious of being a spy so why do you approve his mission? No way you can believe that a spy will not try to smuggle at least one spy in this team especially the way he acted. Yes, he gave us several suggestions based on our feedback but in the end he chose out of the several possibilities. You were 100% for me but this vote put a dent (small but still) in your reputation imo.
- I really liked SL's posts the other day. I think he realised that he posted some stupid things and did try to make up for it (and successfully in my point of view). I hope that resurgence of his posts is not a one time thing and he will now assist us more in team selections!
|
On February 02 2017 22:52 Silverika wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2017 19:21 sharkie wrote:My analysis of the last day: - On February 01 2017 13:23 Vivax wrote: Morning gents.
Today I want to see superbia and TW fighting as they both distrust each other yet as spies they should want the team to pass.
Looking forward to their reasoning for the respective vote. I really want to highlight this post. This was the first time we had our two resident debaters on the same team and just like vivax I was looking forward to their posts to this team nomination. However, neither posted anything about this team and chose the safe way out (rejecting the team). Now I am sure both people will come up with some excuse why yesterday was the day they could not post a lot. But this is way too much coincidence for me as if either had been town they would have surely spoken up and gave us their thoughts about being on the same team. So for me the suspicion of both rose up quite a lot after yesterday. - My next point or question is "wtf silver?" Why did you approve of this team nomination of EC? I thought we were in agreement that EC is very suspicious of being a spy so why do you approve his mission? No way you can believe that a spy will not try to smuggle at least one spy in this team especially the way he acted. Yes, he gave us several suggestions based on our feedback but in the end he chose out of the several possibilities. You were 100% for me but this vote put a dent (small but still) in your reputation imo. - I really liked SL's posts the other day. I think he realised that he posted some stupid things and did try to make up for it (and successfully in my point of view). I hope that resurgence of his posts is not a one time thing and he will now assist us more in team selections! Great, every post we make, someone is gonna come in and say we are going down a peg. If you can't see how everyone townread us and suddely most everyone has a problem is a cause for concern, I don't know what to tell you. It's in scum's best interest to not let anyone get too townread as they can't lynch. Similar to a nightless so discrediting is the next step. On your WTF point, please read our posts as we explained this in depth yesterday during our arguments with Ritani Soul and sicklucker. Ritani Soul actually came out of that looking a lot better that sicklucker BTW who continues to mud sling at us and nothing else this game. We were on the team and EC was not. We were reasonably o.k. with the other two so we said o.k. so we can get a mission passed and get some info. It's not necessarily true that spies will fail the first mission. It highlights them a little too much. Putting a town team in there that would make them look good is exactly what happened last game of this that I played. But regardless, keeping the gamestate stagnated is not helpful to anyone but scum. It creates apathy and that is not good. ~SilverWolf77
It's just that I am a player who values a lot in votes most of the time. One of the top reasons you are my top guy for resistance (because of the voting of the first mission but that's just me). Also I think one of you two (sorry I am still not used to two people using the same account) is a little too impatient. I can understand that you get upset by all these rejections but by getting upset by it you just fall into the spies hands. Also imo you take it a little too personally when someone accuses you of weird actions/being a spy. I think that's perfectly normal in a game such as resistance that every person's actions are questioned. If I had a beef with every person who accused me of being a spy I couldn't talk to anyone in here...
Most people (including me) value your input a lot and consider you top resistance guy.
TLDR: All I am asking you is not to get upset by so many things please.
|
On February 03 2017 07:11 Tumblewood wrote: hey vivax, I want to apologize. in a bad mood today and I overreacted sharkie, how many games have you played on this site?
This is my first time playing resistance online
|
On February 03 2017 17:47 Silverika wrote: I am uneasy about how sharkie started out acting as though he barely even knew what scum meant and basically making a lot of comments like he didn't know what he was doing. Later his post suddenly get a lot better with more analysis. Plus we didn't care for chairman ray either. It's kind of an uneasy feeling based on inconsistent play. I'm gonna talk to ika about Tumblewood cuz he said he wasn't sure he trusted them and let him comment on that. I know I had some issues earlier but they've fallen off the radar lately.
~SilverWolf77
I still only know half of the words you use to describe things. I've played "The resistance" the board game and there no things such as scum or townread appear...
|
On February 03 2017 23:04 Silverika wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2017 19:04 sharkie wrote:On February 03 2017 17:47 Silverika wrote: I am uneasy about how sharkie started out acting as though he barely even knew what scum meant and basically making a lot of comments like he didn't know what he was doing. Later his post suddenly get a lot better with more analysis. Plus we didn't care for chairman ray either. It's kind of an uneasy feeling based on inconsistent play. I'm gonna talk to ika about Tumblewood cuz he said he wasn't sure he trusted them and let him comment on that. I know I had some issues earlier but they've fallen off the radar lately.
~SilverWolf77 I still only know half of the words you use to describe things. I've played "The resistance" the board game and there no things such as scum or townread appear... Have you ever played mafia before? I'm trying to decide if you are just new to the game or being clever trying to make us think you are because your later posting looks more experienced. Even your post giving advice to us looks like a seasoned player. On other sites, I've seen scum do this if the player base doesn't know them because people write it off as new Town so that's why I'm paranoid. ~SilverWolf77
No, I have never played Mafia. Well like I said I have played resistance before. When I get more information I can say more. But for the very first nomination you can't say anything and so I went with gut feeling and I still feel very good about 2/3 of that team. Most of the others probably regret a lot that they rejected RT's team anyway..
But since I have played resistance before I still don't see how spies or resistance can ever claim credit for voting of a successful team (which a few of you claimed I was doing). I am still waiting for that answer: how can a person ever claim credit for voting a successful team?
|
On February 04 2017 01:18 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2017 23:11 sharkie wrote:On February 03 2017 23:04 Silverika wrote:On February 03 2017 19:04 sharkie wrote:On February 03 2017 17:47 Silverika wrote: I am uneasy about how sharkie started out acting as though he barely even knew what scum meant and basically making a lot of comments like he didn't know what he was doing. Later his post suddenly get a lot better with more analysis. Plus we didn't care for chairman ray either. It's kind of an uneasy feeling based on inconsistent play. I'm gonna talk to ika about Tumblewood cuz he said he wasn't sure he trusted them and let him comment on that. I know I had some issues earlier but they've fallen off the radar lately.
~SilverWolf77 I still only know half of the words you use to describe things. I've played "The resistance" the board game and there no things such as scum or townread appear... Have you ever played mafia before? I'm trying to decide if you are just new to the game or being clever trying to make us think you are because your later posting looks more experienced. Even your post giving advice to us looks like a seasoned player. On other sites, I've seen scum do this if the player base doesn't know them because people write it off as new Town so that's why I'm paranoid. ~SilverWolf77 No, I have never played Mafia. Well like I said I have played resistance before. When I get more information I can say more. But for the very first nomination you can't say anything and so I went with gut feeling and I still feel very good about 2/3 of that team. Most of the others probably regret a lot that they rejected RT's team anyway.. But since I have played resistance before I still don't see how spies or resistance can ever claim credit for voting of a successful team (which a few of you claimed I was doing). I am still waiting for that answer: how can a person ever claim credit for voting a successful team? this explains a whole lot.... maybe sharkie is just newbie town who mysteriously has 13k posts
I am a huge LR/football thread spammer
|
People who believe the mission will fail: Superbia Grackaroni sicklucker
- Why did two of you approve the team then? :o I approved the team since silver is my top resistance guy and Grack is voted by everyone else at least top2 resistance guy (I am still neutral to him though, obv. more favoured towards resistance)). Thus, if this team fails I am most definitely going to be the prime suspect. But even if the team does not fail I will still lose since some of you think there have been not enough rejections. That at least would be my thought of process going into voting for this team. Super earlier said this is going to be a win/win situation for him because of the video. I think this is a win/win situation for the spies too as they definitely managed to discredit at least my position.
- Also how did we come from a Super/TW super activity to barely seeing them anymore? I know less and less what to think anymore.
- sicklucker: approving/rejecting keeping secret only works in real life scenarios imo. There is so much meaning lost when you type something instead of seeing your other players face to face. So I don't think you can avoid keeping it open that at all imo. In this setting the more you post the more information you give other players so that's why people who don't post a lot seem very suspect.
P.S. Vivax I hate you for not choosing yourself over me.
|
On February 04 2017 18:21 Vivax wrote:The reason we believe the mission will fail are the approval votes. But ofc it might be too early to call it and it will actually pass. However Show nested quote +. I think this is a win/win situation for the spies too as they definitely managed to discredit at least my position. You are also sure the mission will fail by saying this and you don't really think about who you're gonna blame for it in your post. ????
No I don't think the mission will fail at all. Why should I think that? It has my best members on it..
If you had chosen yourself over me I would not be in that team! :p
|
On February 04 2017 18:29 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2017 18:23 sharkie wrote:On February 04 2017 18:21 Vivax wrote:The reason we believe the mission will fail are the approval votes. But ofc it might be too early to call it and it will actually pass. However . I think this is a win/win situation for the spies too as they definitely managed to discredit at least my position. You are also sure the mission will fail by saying this and you don't really think about who you're gonna blame for it in your post. P.S. Vivax I hate you for not choosing yourself over me. ???? No I don't think the mission will fail at all. Why should I think that? It has my best members on it.. If you had chosen yourself over me I would not be in that team! :p But how can you think you will be discredited if you think the mission will pass?
Because I am the least resistance guy out of us three.
|
|
|
|