|
##UN-nominate: emperorchampion grackattack super
##nominate: super silver tumble
@grack I think I prefer to have super or myself over vivax on the team you mention
|
Almost for certainly tumble / super isn't a team so you should pick at least 1 of them to town read.
Wait wasn't it silver / super that had a mind meld on your team ok thing?
|
I'm mostly worried since tumble and super aren't in thread and there's like 2 hrs till deadline.
|
@art I don't really see a compelling reason to switch super for grack? makes sense to put both on to me
Sorry this is from mobile
|
Oh god I should never run for president
|
On February 01 2017 06:27 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 06:26 emperorchampion wrote:
@art I don't really see a compelling reason to switch super for grack? makes sense to put both on to me
Sorry this is from mobile we trust grack more than super  if it's all equal to you that shouldn't be an issue, right?
I mean I trust supe more I think lol
Idk where tumble is tho, maybe tumble for grack
|
Mm I think I just stick with original + I'm peacing soon
I feel good about this team :D and I encourage y'all to vote yay!!
|
On February 01 2017 06:47 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 06:46 emperorchampion wrote:
Mm I think I just stick with original + I'm peacing soon
I feel good about this team :D and I encourage y'all to vote yay!! You were having doubts about the team before and now you feel good about the team? That's pretty strange.
Huh?
Well fuck, dat tumble timing. tumble how you feel about silver?
|
@rta can you explain the progression on this:
On February 01 2017 00:05 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2017 22:35 emperorchampion wrote:On January 31 2017 21:54 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:50 emperorchampion wrote:On January 31 2017 18:48 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote:
Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo Nope Care to elaborate? I think you should read up since we've discussed it already. Particularly the part where TW came into the game, cast shade on everyone in the original group, and then put up a new one with "this looks right." You come into the thread, in a spot no one can read because Calix didn't do anything, and immediately put up a team without any discussion or any sort of posting that would allow us to read you or any sort of reasoning for the team you picked. I mean you gave a couple reasons on Grack but they weren't really that good. And so far you've just been floating around not doing anything complaining the game is dead. ~SilverWolf77 The issue for me is that I was dropped in as leader at the same time as replacement, it was my excitement to get going! I prefer to give team first and discuss afterwards since I think it's the best way to find a mutually agreeable team. That was just my feeling following the game since I'm used to more active mafia games On January 31 2017 22:14 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 17:59 emperorchampion wrote:Cause grack's a bro: Scum hunting: On January 28 2017 09:35 Grackaroni wrote:I liked his confident (and correct) put down of Vivax's leader logic. On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani His follow up also seems genuine to me. If he had entered the thread with that comment as scum, I would have expected him to use that as justification for having more suspicion/uncertainty on Vivax. On January 28 2017 08:37 Tumblewood wrote:On January 28 2017 08:07 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani Reading between the lines this means that you're fine with superbia and swika but not fine with me not being fine with rtanisoul? no, I think you may be even townier for being this bad but I also politely request you be less bad also I am just examining super and swika, and rtani to an extent, just now Town circling: On January 30 2017 18:22 Grackaroni wrote:On January 30 2017 18:15 Superbia wrote:
Gracky, who would you put on a team? I reread through your filter and you actually looked better than I thought. So I don't know lol. One spot would have to go to Ikawolf. I put my nomination early cause I'm pretty fine with any of my town reads: super/silver/grack On February 01 2017 00:05 RtaniSoul wrote:
Though Tina's waffly on Super still which makes me slightly waffly too grmbl Can you explain all these towreads and why in particular you chose to exclude us from your team of the three you townread? Also, you townread three people but then put this post in: On January 31 2017 20:30 emperorchampion wrote:
tumble/silver/super ?
Basically if the leader puts themselves or not, the question is about who get the more information. Leader putting themselves gives more info to the leader, otherwise gives more info to whoever they put in. So it's a question about who you trust. Not sure I fully trust 2 other people yet though. So you townread three people and would be o.k. with any of them but get some heat and suddenly it's like, you aren't sure you fully trust two people? ~SilverWolf77 super / you having similar thoughts points towards both being town. Similar aggression and level of involvement I think reinforce. I liked super's interactions with tumble. Gracks town read is lower than between you two. I prefer to be on the team since I view it like controlling the variables. In this case it's Grack. If it's not going to pass then obviously there's no point in pushing it, so yeah I'm willing to compromise. Other teams I have in mind are silver/super/tumble, which I saw is already OK for you? Or I think silver/super/vivax is OK. We will yay-vote silver/super/tumble. Have issues with Vivax though.
On February 01 2017 00:07 RtaniSoul wrote:
Our biggest problem is that we don't want vivax subbing in for tumble. Kinda equal between Super/Vivax.
On February 01 2017 05:28 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 04:26 Grackaroni wrote:
I think there's too many people in support of this team. The fact that emperor is pushing superbia over vivax makes me want vivax more >>
|
I think the team is good since both other members are resistance reading silverika, and based off of what I read yesterday I don't really see any reason to put grack over super.
I'm interested to see how the votes fall out here.
|
fwiw don't think that tumble/arti/grack is a team
|
On February 01 2017 02:12 sharkie wrote:Welcome to the club... I will reject any team with tumble or super on it. Their back and forth annoys me to no end, plus they also both suspect me a spy because I apparently was in favour of a "all town" team and wanted to get credit for it...? Getting credit for a vote for teams is ridicilous in the first place and if it was all town why did you reject it then? o.O I trust silver the most (because as I mentioned they voted for a team all spies were against for). Anyone else I am neutral towards.
On February 01 2017 03:00 emperorchampion wrote:
Almost for certainly tumble / super isn't a team so you should pick at least 1 of them to town read.
Wait wasn't it silver / super that had a mind meld on your team ok thing?
I realized that was bad english lol, but answer please: wasn't it silver / super that were both reading you as spy for your approval of the first team. Why do you think one is spy but the other is resistance based on the same logic?
|
On February 01 2017 07:38 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:27 Grackaroni wrote:On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote:
the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels We just can't understand you. As far as I can tell you think that Tumble is too pushy. You like Silverwolf because she voted for the first team. And you really liked the first team. But we have no idea why you like that team so much aside from "there's 6 rebels and only 3 spies", which is true for any team. I just felt good about the people at that time. It's the first team with no information, that's all about your feeling only. Obviously, that has changed now. I don't want Super in a team anymore. Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:28 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote:
the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels technically but what i meant is what do you think about who is resistance and who is a spy? - Silver is resistance, would need some major changes to change my opinion about that. You I feel good towards too. - E/C is a spy for me because he offered us way too many possibilities for a team. That's a big "Hey, I let you guys decide what you want. Just like me please!" - sicklucker had my benefit of doubt till his weird drunk posts... You guys kept accusing people spies because they don't try hard enough - his behaviour reflects that a lot. - Tumble/Super - one of them is my third possible spy. I just don't know which one of them. Maybe there is a scenario where both of them are spies and they go the route of playing totally against each other I don't know (what I don't believe as that would also make sicklucker resistance). The rest are resistance by process of elimination.
On point three: does this make you think that sl is more spy or resistance? Not clear to me.
|
On February 01 2017 19:13 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 07:38 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:27 Grackaroni wrote:On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote:
the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels We just can't understand you. As far as I can tell you think that Tumble is too pushy. You like Silverwolf because she voted for the first team. And you really liked the first team. But we have no idea why you like that team so much aside from "there's 6 rebels and only 3 spies", which is true for any team. I just felt good about the people at that time. It's the first team with no information, that's all about your feeling only. Obviously, that has changed now. I don't want Super in a team anymore. On February 01 2017 07:28 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:10 sharkie wrote:On February 01 2017 07:02 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 07:01 sharkie wrote:
the day of my leadership is nearing :D -pokes- where you at in all this debate sharkie? Ignored and accused. But as I read this game correctly you don't even need me to win this game, right? Only 5/6 are necessary to win as rebels technically but what i meant is what do you think about who is resistance and who is a spy? - Silver is resistance, would need some major changes to change my opinion about that. You I feel good towards too. - E/C is a spy for me because he offered us way too many possibilities for a team. That's a big "Hey, I let you guys decide what you want. Just like me please!" - sicklucker had my benefit of doubt till his weird drunk posts... You guys kept accusing people spies because they don't try hard enough - his behaviour reflects that a lot. - Tumble/Super - one of them is my third possible spy. I just don't know which one of them. Maybe there is a scenario where both of them are spies and they go the route of playing totally against each other I don't know (what I don't believe as that would also make sicklucker resistance). The rest are resistance by process of elimination. On point three: does this make you think that sl is more spy or resistance? Not clear to me.
OK I get it I'm stupid. But idk seems like a null point to me
|
On February 01 2017 22:05 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 18:55 emperorchampion wrote:@rta can you explain the progression on this: On February 01 2017 00:05 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 31 2017 22:35 emperorchampion wrote:On January 31 2017 21:54 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:50 emperorchampion wrote:On January 31 2017 18:48 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote:
Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo Nope Care to elaborate? I think you should read up since we've discussed it already. Particularly the part where TW came into the game, cast shade on everyone in the original group, and then put up a new one with "this looks right." You come into the thread, in a spot no one can read because Calix didn't do anything, and immediately put up a team without any discussion or any sort of posting that would allow us to read you or any sort of reasoning for the team you picked. I mean you gave a couple reasons on Grack but they weren't really that good. And so far you've just been floating around not doing anything complaining the game is dead. ~SilverWolf77 The issue for me is that I was dropped in as leader at the same time as replacement, it was my excitement to get going! I prefer to give team first and discuss afterwards since I think it's the best way to find a mutually agreeable team. That was just my feeling following the game since I'm used to more active mafia games On January 31 2017 22:14 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 17:59 emperorchampion wrote:Cause grack's a bro: Scum hunting: On January 28 2017 09:35 Grackaroni wrote:I liked his confident (and correct) put down of Vivax's leader logic. On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani His follow up also seems genuine to me. If he had entered the thread with that comment as scum, I would have expected him to use that as justification for having more suspicion/uncertainty on Vivax. On January 28 2017 08:37 Tumblewood wrote:On January 28 2017 08:07 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani Reading between the lines this means that you're fine with superbia and swika but not fine with me not being fine with rtanisoul? no, I think you may be even townier for being this bad but I also politely request you be less bad also I am just examining super and swika, and rtani to an extent, just now Town circling: On January 30 2017 18:22 Grackaroni wrote:On January 30 2017 18:15 Superbia wrote:
Gracky, who would you put on a team? I reread through your filter and you actually looked better than I thought. So I don't know lol. One spot would have to go to Ikawolf. I put my nomination early cause I'm pretty fine with any of my town reads: super/silver/grack On February 01 2017 00:05 RtaniSoul wrote:
Though Tina's waffly on Super still which makes me slightly waffly too grmbl Can you explain all these towreads and why in particular you chose to exclude us from your team of the three you townread? Also, you townread three people but then put this post in: On January 31 2017 20:30 emperorchampion wrote:
tumble/silver/super ?
Basically if the leader puts themselves or not, the question is about who get the more information. Leader putting themselves gives more info to the leader, otherwise gives more info to whoever they put in. So it's a question about who you trust. Not sure I fully trust 2 other people yet though. So you townread three people and would be o.k. with any of them but get some heat and suddenly it's like, you aren't sure you fully trust two people? ~SilverWolf77 super / you having similar thoughts points towards both being town. Similar aggression and level of involvement I think reinforce. I liked super's interactions with tumble. Gracks town read is lower than between you two. I prefer to be on the team since I view it like controlling the variables. In this case it's Grack. If it's not going to pass then obviously there's no point in pushing it, so yeah I'm willing to compromise. Other teams I have in mind are silver/super/tumble, which I saw is already OK for you? Or I think silver/super/vivax is OK. We will yay-vote silver/super/tumble. Have issues with Vivax though. On February 01 2017 00:07 RtaniSoul wrote:
Our biggest problem is that we don't want vivax subbing in for tumble. Kinda equal between Super/Vivax. On February 01 2017 05:28 RtaniSoul wrote:On February 01 2017 04:26 Grackaroni wrote:
I think there's too many people in support of this team. The fact that emperor is pushing superbia over vivax makes me want vivax more >> what don't you understand? we both fail to see what's confusing
I think I just don't like how pushy you were about me being "stubborn". Especially Vivax over Super since I don't get a feeling that you're reading him as town too strongly. Actually I think the worst part for me was that a lot of the stuff was like <1hr till the deadline lol. Unless I pretty much rng a team at that point it's tough to think about changes. Maybe super->grack get's more votes, but I'm quite interested in how it plays out and I didn't necessarily think that it was the better team.
I dunno I'm pretty waffly on rtani right now. Pages 5/6 of your filter I like quite a bit. But I'm a little hung up on you showing up in the thread, getting friendly with grack then using that to "get bad vibes" with me since I didn't change the team.
|
On February 02 2017 02:07 sicklucker wrote:
what weird drunk posts? I said ama as an open forum. super dodged it. hell if someones drunk I would probably take advvantage of it
oh boy, I laughed, but I feel bad about it
|
On February 02 2017 02:10 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2017 19:00 emperorchampion wrote:
I think the team is good since both other members are resistance reading silverika, and based off of what I read yesterday I don't really see any reason to put grack over super.
I'm interested to see how the votes fall out here. if your town. you really really really need to vote no on this mission
Vote down my own team? Who would you propose?
|
On February 02 2017 02:15 sicklucker wrote:
its just weird not to include yourself. I dont know why you guys are not doing it and who started it but there probably mafia. its like you bring the town pool from 6/2 to 5/3 which drastically descreases the chance of the mission passing
Logically I agree with you, but practically seems like no one will vote your team so idk
|
Like instantly 3 people say that they won't vote the team on me with it
|
On February 02 2017 02:23 sicklucker wrote:
is it really that bad if you dont pass from your pov? one of the people you included is picking next altho im pretty sure silverika is a spy. but if you think hes town you should assume he can put up a better team that will be voted on
Hmm I dunno, seems like a wasted opportunity. Like if I know the team will be voted down before I put the team up, why put it up at all? May as well put something else up. I feel like that way we actually get useful vote data. Like tumble's team, what use are the votes from that.
Yeah I feel OK about silver putting up a team, but that's in the future. Maybe exhausting all 5 attempts every time gives more vote info, but it's pretty risky since the team is auto accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
