|
On January 27 2017 22:49 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2017 22:44 RtaniSoul wrote:no one has passed the lexy townie test yet :/ including me. bad test? also, echo calix. i kiiiinda soooorta get the gist of the sl/silver thing but at this point it feels more like a miscommunication gone worse/overdramatized and not very interesting super could be. with no sense of humor lol >< i do believe that's possible and perhaps even likely also, sorry in advance calix for the uphill climb you've got with us now  neither of us is certain we'd recognize a town calix if we saw it and despite alternative viable explanations, HtS abandoning us does not have a pretty gut response lol. we'll try to keep open minds I looked at the TW post and aside from him saying "lol this game's easy" I don't get where you're coming from. Is that scummy for him? lol I haven't played with either of you two before so I don't know how to read your slot  But it's pretty clear that HTS replaced out for RL reasons so dunno why that would be something you'd consider wrt me.
-shrugs-
RL reasons can hit both alignments, but i've played enough to know that they tend to be invoked more when your desire to play is lower. usually scum.
this is really not the part where you argue. this is the part where i (we, but perhaps more i than he) admit to a bias, you go okay don't agree but i'll bust my townie ass for you so that you can't doubt me, and we move forward ^^ i'm hardly obligated to acknowledge biases lol it's clearly an effort to let you know what you're up against from this corner if you are town so we can win despite me
that aside
what? xP i said non-sensical tumbles are often town, then recanted when i realized i was thinking of non-sensical boxerfreds rather than than tumbles. there's nothing there to ask about. unless you're wondering why he's on lex's proposed team
at which point i say...townie test...but perhaps a bad one
will you be the first contestant to try her hand?
|
On January 27 2017 22:48 Superbia wrote:
Let's just exclude the following people from all teams:
- TW
- Calix
- Grack
- CR
this may actually be were i begin to townread you. without lex's blessing but whatevs xP he's too busy playing heroes. i think. i'm supposed to be studying >> this is why i don't mafia anymore lol
|
On January 27 2017 22:57 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2017 22:54 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 27 2017 22:49 Calix wrote:On January 27 2017 22:44 RtaniSoul wrote:no one has passed the lexy townie test yet :/ including me. bad test? also, echo calix. i kiiiinda soooorta get the gist of the sl/silver thing but at this point it feels more like a miscommunication gone worse/overdramatized and not very interesting super could be. with no sense of humor lol >< i do believe that's possible and perhaps even likely also, sorry in advance calix for the uphill climb you've got with us now neither of us is certain we'd recognize a town calix if we saw it and despite alternative viable explanations, HtS abandoning us does not have a pretty gut response lol. we'll try to keep open minds I looked at the TW post and aside from him saying "lol this game's easy" I don't get where you're coming from. Is that scummy for him? lol I haven't played with either of you two before so I don't know how to read your slot But it's pretty clear that HTS replaced out for RL reasons so dunno why that would be something you'd consider wrt me. -shrugs- RL reasons can hit both alignments, but i've played enough to know that they tend to be invoked more when your desire to play is lower. usually scum. this is really not the part where you argue. this is the part where i (we, but perhaps more i than he) admit to a bias, you go okay don't agree but i'll bust my townie ass for you so that you can't doubt me, and we move forward ^^ i'm hardly obligated to acknowledge biases lol it's clearly an effort to let you know what you're up against from this corner if you are town so we can win despite me that aside what? xP i said non-sensical tumbles are often town, then recanted when i realized i was thinking of non-sensical boxerfreds rather than than tumbles. there's nothing there to ask about. unless you're wondering why he's on lex's proposed team at which point i say...townie test...but perhaps a bad one will you be the first contestant to try her hand? Hell no am I putting in more effort just because of someone else. Yeah I am wondering why TW's on the team.
i'm considering expanding the townie test to include reading comprehension ^^ sadly in the past that has also proved to be not very reliable lol
|
On January 27 2017 23:02 Vivax wrote:Superbia/me/TBD seems like a pretty good team. Show nested quote +On January 27 2017 22:56 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 27 2017 22:48 Superbia wrote:
Let's just exclude the following people from all teams:
- TW
- Calix
- Grack
- CR this may actually be were i begin to townread you. without lex's blessing but whatevs xP he's too busy playing heroes. i think. i'm supposed to be studying >> this is why i don't mafia anymore lol What are you studying now? Also try stealing his ethernet cable when he does that he isn't allowed to play anything but resistance now.
Don't make me come down there and steal all your schnitzels
|
On January 27 2017 23:02 Vivax wrote:Superbia/me/TBD seems like a pretty good team. Show nested quote +On January 27 2017 22:56 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 27 2017 22:48 Superbia wrote:
Let's just exclude the following people from all teams:
- TW
- Calix
- Grack
- CR this may actually be were i begin to townread you. without lex's blessing but whatevs xP he's too busy playing heroes. i think. i'm supposed to be studying >> this is why i don't mafia anymore lol What are you studying now? Also try stealing his ethernet cable when he does that he isn't allowed to play anything but resistance now.
he might beat me though o.0
international relations. specifically kosovo and the time-honored should we/shouldn't we employ military intervention debate
was it legal? wasn't it? should it be? lol >< shoot me now. the topic is interesting until you spend all day reading about it
|
lol no idea. i don't think so
oh, lex says i have authority xD how much time do we have left?
|
mrt erased my post @.@
short version:
silverika lex has a townread on for the way he's responded to a few people, including sl (i'm deferring to him on that cause no real opinion), and i like super, so suggestion is:
RtaniSoul, silverika, Super
lex thought including tumble might give more insight on tumble's nominations (yes, that was the great townie test >>) idk personally how valuable a strat that is. my experience with resistance is pretty slight. but assuming he's right on silverika it would probably tell us something
random other bit, lex thinks sl may be town for *bad* reasons lol ^^ so he's in our slight column somewhere if we were keeping better track >>
|
o.0 and another one bites the dust!
|
Well, as I see no particular reason to change it, I'll go with this. I'll be around tonight though as I'm stuck in with a swollen knee, so feel free to still discuss/suggest/what have you.
##nominate: RtaniSoul, Silverika, Superbia
|
On January 28 2017 03:49 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote:On January 28 2017 03:31 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:27 Silverika wrote:On January 28 2017 03:17 Vivax wrote:
Fyi I'm rejecting cause I don't trust RtaniSoul yet.
Superbia Silverika seems fine to me though. could you elaborate on all of these? You seem R cause gut feeling. Superbia seems R cause he seems to be plaing to the best of his abilities which is a good indicator. Also liked his read on me but that's a more subjective reason. RtaniSoul seem derpy and too hung up on sending themselves. I suspect them of being S while sending two R along with them. Why would they not send themselves on their own mission?? I'd find it pretty strange to exclude themselves during the first selection. It's always safe to send yourself cuz of the "i know im town argument" duh.
-shrugs- won't argue strategy with you, but suffice to say that wouldn't be very bright of us lol in your world
more interested in sharkie's response...cheerleader dude beginning to get to me :/
|
also, grack, i think i'd rather you be forthright with your vote. can't really conceive of a reason as to why you'd hide it
|
On January 28 2017 04:05 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 03:55 RtaniSoul wrote:
also, grack, i think i'd rather you be forthright with your vote. can't really conceive of a reason as to why you'd hide it Because it makes for great suspense. Plus you (or your partner) mentioned that it would sometimes make sense for town to lie about how they're going to vote. The same reasons would apply for me keeping my vote a secret.
did he? i don't read the swill he writes ^^ i suppose i can ask him when he gets back from his mother's, though
-flicks things at viva- then i expect you to have a reason not to trust us that doesn't involve us putting ourselves on the first team, since by your own admission that means nothing whatsoever for our alignment
did i miss where you said a grouping you would trust? cause i'm more interested in that than whatever dumbassery this is lol ><
|
On January 28 2017 04:21 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On January 28 2017 03:49 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote:On January 28 2017 03:31 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:27 Silverika wrote:On January 28 2017 03:17 Vivax wrote:
Fyi I'm rejecting cause I don't trust RtaniSoul yet.
Superbia Silverika seems fine to me though. could you elaborate on all of these? You seem R cause gut feeling. Superbia seems R cause he seems to be plaing to the best of his abilities which is a good indicator. Also liked his read on me but that's a more subjective reason. RtaniSoul seem derpy and too hung up on sending themselves. I suspect them of being S while sending two R along with them. Why would they not send themselves on their own mission?? I'd find it pretty strange to exclude themselves during the first selection. It's always safe to send yourself cuz of the "i know im town argument" duh. But wouldn't you send yourself? Seems like a stupid question tbh, both alignments want that, and that's why I don't want that. So no, I won't suggest myself when I nominate unless others widely recognized my alignment. For the information value.
...yeah actually i will discuss it. what, exactly, makes it better for you as 'town' to not be part of a team that ends up sabotaging rather than to be part of the team? except to not be included in the resulting suspicion, anyway
|
on the bright side, since i can't really fathom a town reason to not include yourself on a team, i'm perfectly happy with your proposal vivax ^^
|
On January 28 2017 04:43 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 03:27 Silverika wrote:On January 28 2017 03:22 sharkie wrote:On January 28 2017 02:25 RtaniSoul wrote:
Well, as I see no particular reason to change it, I'll go with this. I'll be around tonight though as I'm stuck in with a swollen knee, so feel free to still discuss/suggest/what have you.
##nominate: RtaniSoul, Silverika, Superbia Good choice, i will vote for this team! why? what about it makes you town read the entire group? Why not? 6 of us are good and its very unlikely that a spy is in the initial team. You also gave good valid reasons for choosing the team.
silver did?
what makes you say that it's unlikely for a spy to be in the initial team?
|
On January 28 2017 04:56 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 04:32 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 28 2017 04:21 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On January 28 2017 03:49 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:37 Grackaroni wrote:On January 28 2017 03:31 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 03:27 Silverika wrote:On January 28 2017 03:17 Vivax wrote:
Fyi I'm rejecting cause I don't trust RtaniSoul yet.
Superbia Silverika seems fine to me though. could you elaborate on all of these? You seem R cause gut feeling. Superbia seems R cause he seems to be plaing to the best of his abilities which is a good indicator. Also liked his read on me but that's a more subjective reason. RtaniSoul seem derpy and too hung up on sending themselves. I suspect them of being S while sending two R along with them. Why would they not send themselves on their own mission?? I'd find it pretty strange to exclude themselves during the first selection. It's always safe to send yourself cuz of the "i know im town argument" duh. But wouldn't you send yourself? Seems like a stupid question tbh, both alignments want that, and that's why I don't want that. So no, I won't suggest myself when I nominate unless others widely recognized my alignment. For the information value. ...yeah actually i will discuss it. what, exactly, makes it better for you as 'town' to not be part of a team that ends up sabotaging rather than to be part of the team? except to not be included in the resulting suspicion, anyway Cause if we accept self nomination widely any spy can include themselves for no reason other than "im town duh". I want leaders to have a better reason than that.
yeah that's really a shit reason, viva
if you're town and you put yourself on a team you accomplish two things: 1) minimizing the pool of suspects if the mission is sabotaged, and 2) increasing the chances that there is no possibility of sabotage
i bet you can guess where 'appeasing a viva whose alignment i don't even know' falls in terms of priority there lol >< again, you're going to need a better reason to scumread us than what is by your definition null
more importantly, who do YOU think should be on the first mission if not us? this is just naysaying
|
this actually reminds me of the kosovo material and the argument: but, but, intervention COULD be abused, therefore it shouldn't be allowed
the fact that scum could use the argument that they're town to put themselves on a team just means that you ignore that argument, not that you concoct some bs where you don't pass anyone who puts themselves on a team because they did that
so i'll ask again, and i do expect real answers
1) do you have any reason at all to think we're scum other than putting ourselves on a team?
and
2) who would you have go on the mission other than us?
|
On January 28 2017 05:24 Vivax wrote:
I'm very comfy with nay saying until I get a better grip on the game.
Aggressively pushing a specific team is very much spy play.
who would you have go on the mission other than us?
|
if you're worried about looking like a spy for having a concrete answer, you can also just give me who you would vote no to. or you can just not give me anything, including a reason to change my read on you ^^
up to you
|
On January 28 2017 05:36 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 05:33 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 28 2017 05:24 Vivax wrote:
I'm very comfy with nay saying until I get a better grip on the game.
Aggressively pushing a specific team is very much spy play. who would you have go on the mission other than us? Dunno yet :> But secretly you wish I would say: myself
lol frankly i don't care. i want you to say something. i'm still trying to decide if this is normal viva retarded or actually scummy. it would be hella nice if you weren't frequently incomprehensible to me as town, you know. then i could just write you off here and now ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
