EPTEDIT: I mean /in. You kids and your lingo.
Liquidmania Qualifier #1
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
EDIT: I mean /in. You kids and your lingo. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 17 2016 09:53 iamperfection wrote: thanks Looks like we are full but ill list you as a replacement if you like but no one is going to replace because i will reach through their computer screen and murder them. We will start on Sunday night this will make it so christmas eve will be a night phase and we can stop their at deadline and pick it back up on Monday. It's fine, I'll just wait on the next NSMM. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 18 2016 09:34 Calix wrote: I actually have to /out so if you want my spot, it's all yours  /in it is. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
| ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
Also hello to Shapelog and Darthfoley (where did he know me from?)! Looks like we won't know about what setup we get unless a blue does something. GLHF | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 19 2016 10:44 Holyflare wrote: Thanks man, that's really kind of you. Expect me to actually try hard this game because I want that title back and I have the holidays off! Sorry what? I haven't been on here for the better part of a year so everything you said just went over my head. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 19 2016 21:17 Koshi wrote: I was wrong. Alakaslam tried to connect with the thread with his question. It is not that mafia after all. The person who didn't tried to do anything should be the plynch. ##unvote ##vote Kmatt Good morning to you too. So what's the deal behind policy lynching anyway? I'm a little fresh to this so I'm not sure I get it. Is it just taking a jab at someone so you have something to vote on day one? | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:06 sicklucker wrote: kill lightning strike. via night kill preferably Wait what? Are you just sarcastically scumbaiting or do we not like LS? If you're asking for a night kill aren't you assuming he's town? Or is it that you think he's a bad town and will get himself lynched if left alive? | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:21 LightningStrike wrote: What your opinion on this Kmatt? Do you think think he was being sarcastic about me or do you think he scumslipped this early or what? My assumption is that he thinks you're a bad town and wants you gone before you waste a lynch vote. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:22 Kmatt wrote: My assumption is that he thinks you're a bad town and wants you gone before you waste a lynch vote. Which is to say he's acting like town. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:27 LightningStrike wrote: Honestly if I was a bad town I surprised he would night kill me when he's scum because it would mean he thinks I was a threat on finding his team. I'm willing to bet that was sarcasm. SL any input here? I'd rather not have to speak on your behalf when we're in this thread together. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:29 LightningStrike wrote: Also why you think it would come from town instead of scum? I not quite following your thought process for this. I said town-like, not necessarily town. Since town's interest lies in getting correct lynches, having you around (as I read him) means that sooner or later you're going to say/do something stupid to get people to think you're scum and get lynched. A lynch that could have gone to someone more red. By being night killed it solves that problem ahead of time. From my time in a scum chat I couldn't see them taking you out anyway assuming you are town. So it's harmless banter. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
| ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:36 ExO_ wrote: "in this thread together" I wish I had a buddy in the thread with me That's a little too opportunistic/innocuous of an entry without contributing to a discussion. ##vote ExO_ | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
Your post was cherry-picking a reply as to not be inactive but still be out of sight for the last 12 hours. Mine is acknowledging low-hanging fruit. And you still aren't questioning/analyzing/posting reads so | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 00:45 LightningStrike wrote: Misunderstanding on my part there. To tell you the truth I been night killed 4 out of my last like 5/6 games as town and I wasn't even blue in any of them and 2 of the times it was sicklucker on the scum team. I not really a good lynch Day 1 since I show myself to be town better as the game gets on in fact if it get past Day 2 I practically unlynchable as I only been mislynched once past Day 2 as town and that was in LYLO in my 4th game  But since we talking about being night killed solved the problem ahead don't you think it be weird for scum to kill someone who doesn't look good?It would be weird for scum to do what SL says yes, but he's effectively asking them nicely to make our jobs easy. Scum wants to kill the good townies. He's suggesting they "waste" a shot on you instead. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
LS seems town. Nothing groundbreaking but certainly nothing damning out of him. I was ready to unvote ExO_ if he came in with some good responses (obviously we all sleep, not a huge deal) but from seeing his kneejerk reaction to me pointing a finger and nothing else makes me more confident in my call. Alakaslam/Koshi/Holyflame are still ambiguous. I have to go take a final so I'll be back later. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 01:34 ExO_ wrote: so somehow koshi/kmatt are going to come into the thread, scum reading me for some stupid ass reason. kmatt ignores my comment about him buddying, as any scum would. and both koshi/kmatt ignore disinformation pseudo defending me. If I'm scummy, why isn't disinfo scummy too hmm koshi/kmatt? Okay looking back I misread you the first time, thought you meant I was buddying with LightningStrike by conversing. Still not really buddying with Sicklucker, it was LS who was having a hard time understanding the comment so there's no harm in explaining it to him. My bit about "being in this thread together" refers to the fact that SL could very easily answer these questions himself. And Disinfo not immediately agreeing with me doesn't make him scum. Being this invested in your own innocence and pointing fingers at us for having the audacity to doubt you is scummy. If you were really town you'd be proving it by lynching scum, not throwing shade because we're scumhunting. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
As someone said earlier, my initial jab at Exo was more testing the water than anything. His overreaction is the basis of my current read. Disinformation didn't rebuke my case in any meaningful way. He just interpreted your post differently, and there was nothing odd or unreasonable about it. If he claimed that my current read is baseless, started pointing fingers without a case or spouted expletives I would have reason to suspect him. At the moment I don't. It looks like Exo is digging this hole deeper with every refresh so I would need a substantial new case to take my vote off of him. | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
On December 20 2016 02:31 ExO_ wrote: Why is disinfo not-suspicious? My logic is this: Koshi/Kmatt think I'm scum Disinfo immediately tries to deflect the thread away from kmatt's scum reading of me Therefore if Koshi/Kmatt are really town, who really think I'm scum, they should at least be questioning disinfo What is this "deflection" you seem to think we should be concerned about? IIRC he was commenting on your angry post saying that you're not a morning person. | ||
| ||
