|
On February 20 2016 07:15 Tictock wrote:
So did I not actually post stuff about Tumble?
Was it all just a dream?
Kus it's weird to me that Trfel sorta agreed with me but brushed it off and nobody else seems to care.
the problem with your case is that you didn't quote the part where tumble said he palmar was a bad lynch. ill try to find it.
|
So TT, I looked into your point against tumble, which I will paraphrase as "tumble said palmar was a bad lynch then he voted for him over scott."
Here's where he said palmar was a bad lynch:
On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote.
Essentially that list is saying he doesn't want to lynch anyone but SL and Shining. Neither of those lynches were on the table, so it makes sense for Palmar's lynch to become more viable in his mind.
It made sense to me that he thought scott was so inactive that palmar's slightly more active lurking was more scummy.
|
TT, also you can't interpret "bad lynch" as townread. The "do not lynch" list is his townreads.
|
SO DONT MISREP MY MAN TUMBLE!
|
tt -- complains that no one listens to his tumble case, then ignore me when i try to engage him about it
|
On February 20 2016 08:52 nooniansoong wrote:
tt -- complains that no one listens to his tumble case, then ignore me when i try to engage him about it
inb4 tumble complains about my complaint.
sorry i just want instant gratification.
|
*inb4 tt complains about my complaint.
too many t names in this game.
|
I never claimed Tumble had a townread on Palmar.
"Do not Lynch" speaks for itself, so why did Palmar become lynchable in Tumble's mind?
After Shape claimed blue, what happened to his read on SL? Scott was down as a "wait and see" and hadn't done anything else since that post.
So why would he say this,
On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar
when multiple (GB and Scott) of his "wait and see" people where also viable lynch's?
+ Show Spoiler +On February 19 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:
Wow I am regretting my Palmar vote more and more by the hour. The reason I voted was because there were three wagons sitting at two votes (Scott, Shining, and... GB, I think) and I thought they all sucked. They were all effectively p-lynches on people who hadn't been active, and those hit town more often than not. He did sorta explain with this, but I don't buy it. I mean wasn't Palmar essentially being Plynched there as well?
I also thought his read and vote onto Shape was weird and kinda opportunistic.
Also yea, suggesting that me not responding right away is me ignoring you is an attack on my character, which is kinda scummy.
|
I'm looking back through my notes and the main reason I was scumreading GB was his townreads on Shape. Now that Shape is blue claimed, I feel a little worse about that read.
|
Never mind
Scum can be correct for shitty reasons too
|
On February 20 2016 09:31 Tictock wrote:I never claimed Tumble had a townread on Palmar. "Do not Lynch" speaks for itself, so why did Palmar become lynchable in Tumble's mind? After Shape claimed blue, what happened to his read on SL? Scott was down as a "wait and see" and hadn't done anything else since that post. So why would he say this, Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar when multiple (GB and Scott) of his "wait and see" people where also viable lynch's? + Show Spoiler +On February 19 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:
Wow I am regretting my Palmar vote more and more by the hour. The reason I voted was because there were three wagons sitting at two votes (Scott, Shining, and... GB, I think) and I thought they all sucked. They were all effectively p-lynches on people who hadn't been active, and those hit town more often than not. He did sorta explain with this, but I don't buy it. I mean wasn't Palmar essentially being Plynched there as well? I also thought his read and vote onto Shape was weird and kinda opportunistic. Also yea, suggesting that me not responding right away is me ignoring you is an attack on my character, which is kinda scummy.
It was an attack on your attack on your character. That's why I took it back kind of.
I haven't looked into his Shape read.
But I think he is consistent in that he wanted to wait and see in regards to GB and Scott.
Palmar was not a "Do Not Lynch." He was a "Bad Lynch."
And I think you are reading too much into the list title "Bad Lynch"
|
|
|
I've worked all day long and I came back to a thread sayinf that I'm scum for no fucking reason
|
Well...
WTF have you done for town GB?
Like it can't seriously be a surprise to you that people scumread for doing jack all for 2 days, but draw some pictures and fake claim.
Same goes for Tumble. You guys come in and make useless posts >.<
|
On February 20 2016 16:08 Tictock wrote:
Well...
WTF have you done for town GB?
Like it can't seriously be a surprise to you that people scumread for doing jack all for 2 days, but draw some pictures and fake claim.
Same goes for Tumble. You guys come in and make useless posts >.<
What have YOU done for town more than I did? Posting paint drawings in the night doesn't necessarily mean I have done less than you did in this game just because you can be more active than I am.
Today is Saturday and I'll have time this afternoon to do stuff
But for starters, some clarification:
Shining if I claim vigi and get shot at night and flip VT, we can confirm the real vigi day3, thus, reducing the PoE list for lynching mafia. That was my plan.
Truffle, my push on Kush isn't illogical. He had 0 reads at EOD and tried to lynch me for a policy lynch that is "GB is unreadable". It is so, so easy, as Mafia, to hide oneself behind this argument to justify a lynch.
I will read his filter later to form my read with more basis, but that was my reason to suspect him.
Rsoultin flipped her read on me for no fucking reason also. I'll also take a look at her filter, but she might be scum for that. Whenever she has a read on me, it is precise. It's not her fashion, as town, to do such thing like that.
|
There's the hallmark scum gb fake anger
|
GlowingBear is mafia because he's not freaking out and he's STILL not doing anything, just reacting.
Glad to finally be back at a computer so I can vote for him.
|
On February 21 2016 00:55 Trfel wrote:
GlowingBear is mafia because he's not freaking out and he's STILL not doing anything, just reacting.
Glad to finally be back at a computer so I can vote for him.
On February 20 2016 21:46 nooniansoong wrote:
There's the hallmark scum gb fake anger
I'd love to counter argue this, but it seems I'm Mafia for not getting angry and getting angry at the same time
|
On February 21 2016 01:00 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2016 00:55 Trfel wrote:
GlowingBear is mafia because he's not freaking out and he's STILL not doing anything, just reacting.
Glad to finally be back at a computer so I can vote for him. Show nested quote +On February 20 2016 21:46 nooniansoong wrote:
There's the hallmark scum gb fake anger I'd love to counter argue this, but it seems I'm Mafia for not getting angry and getting angry at the same time GlowingBear, who should I vote for if not you, and why?
|
Unofficial Vote Count
GlowingBear (3): The Shining, nooniansoong, Trfel
scott31337 (2): rsoultin, Breshke
Tumblewood (1): Breshke, Tictock
The Shining (0): Breshke
Not Voting (4): Shapelog, Tumblewood, scott31337, GlowingBear
Currently, GlowingBear is set to be lynched with 3 votes. Voting ends at 16:00 EST today, in .
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
