|
On November 25 2015 11:44 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 11:38 GlowingBear wrote:On November 25 2015 11:32 Koshi wrote:On November 25 2015 11:17 GlowingBear wrote:On November 25 2015 08:30 Koshi wrote: Was too busy playing Diablo III to see the start of this game. I rolled town.
I have total interest to play a calm and smooth game though. Diablo III? You've lost all my respect The money grabbing assholes from Activision completely fucked Diablo III on release, making it a piece of garbage. But in it's current form it is a very enjoyable game. It became really good. Trivia: I and 3 friends took 2-3 days free of work to play Diablo III on release. I even bought a new PC, then we played for like 60+ hours in 5 days. We were all sick to our stomach on how completely utterly shit the game was. Biggest disappointment I ever had in a game I ever played. We played for 60 hours hoping it would be better but it was so unbelievable shit. Didn't touch the game for over a year. Recently picked up the expansion with a mate and it has been fun because other people kept saying it became good. And it did. Ran through the entire campaign in 4-5 non consecutive days (dnu in how many hours, maybe 20?), very enjoyable because you can actually change the difficulty of mobs in exchange for more gold and xp and items. And today we did the new dungeon thingie in which you get a random generated dungeon and then need to run it on the difficulty you chose, harder = more loot. Item progression is steady and enjoyable. Good game. I am just upset they fucked it so hard in the ass on release. Yeah, the last time I played we still had the auction house. But the plot is a disgrace to the franchise anyway I agree porn is better with a good story added to it.
Bad comparison.
Right comparison:
Previous games - porn with a good story that you can skip
Diablo III - porn with shitty story with unskippable fat naked man appearing on the screen screaming "you'll never get to the end of it!!!"
|
On November 25 2015 11:53 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 11:43 GlowingBear wrote:On November 25 2015 11:39 ANickelDrink wrote:On November 25 2015 11:35 Koshi wrote: I wonder where Diablo II sits on my best games I played list. Under Warcraft III, C& C: Red alert, WoW, Dota. Somewhere there? I played Diablo II so many hours. I'm relentlessly biased toward that game. Including LoD I'd put it in my top 3 easily up there with brood war and Heroes of newerth.+ Show Spoiler +HoN with a playerbase = best MOBA LOL No. Btw FF can you post with your original account just to make sure you are FF? oh no oops wrong accouuuunntttt
I love you
|
Enough dicking around.
What do you guys think of what I've brought on Tictock?
|
Ok can we now talk about the game? Just comment on my reads post
|
On November 25 2015 12:25 ANickelDrink wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 12:15 GlowingBear wrote: Ok can we now talk about the game? Just comment on my reads post Yes sir, sorry sir. No I haven't had anything to drink tonight officer. Am I free to go? I do not consent to any searches.
You can't go. How could you not have any drinks tonight? This is insane!
Anyway, I'm going to re read tictock's post to check what you're saying
|
On November 25 2015 09:04 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 08:48 sicklucker wrote:On November 25 2015 08:46 Chromatically wrote:On November 25 2015 08:43 sicklucker wrote:On November 25 2015 08:09 Chromatically wrote: I'm more interested in if he thinks FF is mafia for that? ya probably. Hes afraid he will be outed and coming clean will gain him town cred. Theres no way ff smurfed to reveal himself the 80% of the time he rolled town. It makes no sense... Espiecally since I have never seen him get mafia in like 15 games with him... lynch ff for sanity Hmm, I had the opposite reaction. Why would he be afraid of being outed as a smurf? Ok so ff has a very high perecentage of rolling town. Town is like 80% of the players. Why would he make a smurf when hes only getting mafia like 23% of the time or whatever. Especially when he historically never gets mafia anyway.. lol.. Hmm? You might have a point here, especially revealing so early before he could even see the affects of smurfing.
FF tends to play fairly lazily the first few days and picks it up later. Maybe he rolled mafia and was worried people would push him early on?Course all of this is assuming it's actually FF and not someone trying to mind game us early... that's pretty tinfoily though and would be a pretty silly play. Gunna put this down as slightly suspect but possibly NAI for now.
Nah, FF. He clearly agrees with SL. It's not a "I understand you, but..."
Let me expand my suspicions on this post.
If I see somethig that is NAI, whenever someone says it is suspicious, I will tell them that it's NAI. Whenever I see something that I find suspicious and someone say its suspicious, I will simply agree with it.
I don't understand how can someone agree on a suspicion but reach the conclusion that that is NAI. His thought process is disconnected with his conclusion. In other words, it just sounds that he tried to fake putting thoughts on it when he was really just... Posting.
Also, if this is slightly suspicious, why classifying it as NAI now instead of pushing it further, especially on the early phase of the game when usually we have NOTHING to pursue?
Do you understsnd what I'm trying to say?
|
On November 25 2015 12:37 Chromatically wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 11:30 GlowingBear wrote: Cool, some weak early reads:
Koshi looks townie for his tone. Especially when he makes the post of the town pyramid and the following one.
Chrom looks townie for thinking critically about the game.
SL looks scummy for this hard push on FF on a matter that isn't really alignment indicative.
Tictock looks scummy for commenting that SL may have a point but concluding that FF's thing isn't alignment indicative. If SL does have a point then it is alignment indicative. If it isn't alignment indicative, SL doesn't have a point. Therefore you just look you're posting to look contributive while actually being fluffy and pushing the matter nowhere sicklucker I'm not sure about. I agree he could be mafia for his push over something which I agree wasn't alignment indicative, but I liked that he didn't back down about it when he came under pressure. Ticktock I agree with your point, plus he just kind of came in and posted those non-opinions on FF and then peaced out. Koshi I don't have a read on. Let me expand on what I mean about OO: Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 07:58 ObviousOne wrote:On November 25 2015 07:57 sicklucker wrote: And yes i am role hunting explain Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 08:07 ObviousOne wrote: how can you be rolehunting when the op says everyone is vanilla? Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 08:10 ObviousOne wrote: tbh it looks to me like you either a) lied about rolehunting when you meant smurfhunting and then stuck to your lie for whatever reason or b) didn't read the setup or c) you're mafia and just hinted at the hidden mechanic sicklucker posts his stuff about FF's claim being weird and also makes a comment about rolehunting. OO jumps on the "rolehunting" part of it, which is the part that looks weird and is easy to jump on as mafia (I was interested in his read on FF from it). The third post is the one I particularly didn't like. The whole post says nothing at all (no conclusion or any point for the post), it seems like it's just a poor attempt to explain why he jumped on the rolehunting comment when it clearly didn't mean much.
I agree with you + the part where he overreacts to your suspicions
|
Hmm, I'll place my vote on Tictock because I prefer it for now, but I can follow that read of yours, Chrom
|
On November 25 2015 18:53 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2015 11:43 Chromatically wrote: GB, what do you think about OO and Sn0's reactions to the sicklucker-FF situation? I think I like OO's reaction the least out of anyone.
I like your point about TicTock too, though. I had this problem last game i played OO where his posts all seemed really stilted and formulaic and emotionless, except he was town. So that was fun
Well but this is not Chrom's argument on OO
|
On November 25 2015 23:40 Koshi wrote: You guys convinced me that TT is a better lynch.
##unvote ##vote: TickTock
When did you get convinced?
|
Marv can you tell us what do you think of Tictock and OO and comment on what has been brought on both of them?
|
ohai, excuse me, is there a game going on here?
|
On November 26 2015 01:14 Onegu wrote: I figured out you guys need to ask me stuff. I am not really good at seeing things on my own but if you are like, Onegu what do you think about _______? I will look it up and give you a answer.+
Onegu what do you think about what I've said on Tictock and what Chrom said about OO?
Also, would you rather milk a cow or let a cow milk you?
|
On November 26 2015 01:46 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2015 00:11 GlowingBear wrote: Marv can you tell us what do you think of Tictock and OO and comment on what has been brought on both of them? how many games have you played with me now? if I had something worthwhile to say about either, do you estimate the chances i'd just sit on it silently to be a) low b) very low c) non-existent d) eerily homosexual ?
Letter D!!! 
I know, Marv. But if I say "someone is scummy because of X", you automatically have an opinion that is either "I agree this is scummy", "I disagree this is scummy" or "it is NAI". Being silent may imply the latter, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly say that in the thead 
I always feel compelled to ask you questions, anyway. This is how I play. I try to get people to talk
|
On November 26 2015 02:10 Chromatically wrote: I'm totally alright with having a wagon on TicTock.
marv makes me a bit uncomfortable for now but I feel like that will become clearer with time.
Meh, don't be, Marv should never be a worry
|
On November 26 2015 02:14 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2015 02:13 GlowingBear wrote:On November 26 2015 01:46 marvellosity wrote:On November 26 2015 00:11 GlowingBear wrote: Marv can you tell us what do you think of Tictock and OO and comment on what has been brought on both of them? how many games have you played with me now? if I had something worthwhile to say about either, do you estimate the chances i'd just sit on it silently to be a) low b) very low c) non-existent d) eerily homosexual ? Letter D!!!  I know, Marv. But if I say "someone is scummy because of X", you automatically have an opinion that is either "I agree this is scummy", "I disagree this is scummy" or "it is NAI". Being silent may imply the latter, but it doesn't hurt to explicitly say that in the thead  I always feel compelled to ask you questions, anyway. This is how I play. I try to get people to talk And I always feel compelled to remind people that I offer my opinions when I have them 
I guess we are both satisfied, then! Isn't it marvelous?
|
On November 26 2015 02:16 Sn0_Man wrote: I'm curious as to why u feel taht way gb
In late game he is pretty obvious when he is mafia (usually) and if he is town his existence is always a threat to mafia. Which means I don't have to worry
|
On November 26 2015 02:24 Sn0_Man wrote: if i vote sicklucker its me'n'him in a shitflinging fest nobody cares about with extremely limited material to work with that develops into a useless sideshow that if he's maf he can use to say "look i'm scumhunting" by targetting townie ol me.
meanwhile we make a nice wagon on tictock and he gets pressured in a way that should help us read him. It's not like this is a serious lynch wagon. yet.
u know basic mafia things
It's pretty serious to me
|
On November 26 2015 02:36 Sn0_Man wrote: u do u i guess
Like, she sent me heart emoticons and shit. I can't see it getting more serious than this.
|
On November 26 2015 04:41 Koshi wrote: Let me clarify:
We can lynch marv Or We cannot lynch marv On d1
Both are possible. We just wait and see.
Wow!! Are you implying that in a mafia game the players either gets voted and die or they survive???
:OOOO
|
|
|
|