Newbie Student Mafia XII - Page 2

On July 12 2015 12:46 Half the Sky wrote:


I think in 18-19 hours' time let's see if you find the noose interesting.

##vote MoosyDoosy

On July 12 2015 21:18 WonnaPlay wrote:
So, unfortunately this started on a busy weekend for me, but here I am again.
As for my background in Mafia, I have none, but I have played "Werewolves of Miller's Hollow", which is similar I guess.

My initial thoughts are that there are some people who are actually trying to help the discussion so far and some people are just trying to create chaos.
In my opinion people who try to create chaos aren't playing happily for the village.

NHM : somehow votes really really early, without having a solid argument.

MoosyDoosy: Votes on NHM with the motto of sheep. I'm not particularly fond of sheep, becuse in that case it seems like you will vote with anyone, just so you don't get killed during the day, which seems conspicuous. He does seem to "try" to help, but voting on himself afterwards isn't really helpfull either.
My first impression on MD is that he is trying to create too much chaos, which is scumlike. But in the same time it seems like he is just trying to provoke alot of people, which is townlike i guess?

Scott : somehow says he has a townlead towards Fidei, but hasn't said anything since, nor did he do anything to explain his thoughts, which seems just really random.

TJHuggins : seems to be trying to find out more information on certain partys, which is better (imo) than spraying confusement.

HTS: seems to be really forward in his questions calling people onto their nonsense, which could be really strong mafia play, but for now it seems like he is legitimately hunting.

Ghandi : I don't really know what he's thinking, he seems to try to avoid policy lynches on the first day, which I can understand, but it could also just be easy targeting/avoiding death. I don't have experience with this game, but I doubt that "Day 1 reads are all luck anyways" is true.. I think you can really come to some sort of fruition about some people..

Kelsier : So far he has only spammed nonesense into this thread, which is confusing for everyone. I think mafia players like chaos in the game, so in this case Kelsier is doing a "good" thing, by being a bit active without doing anything to help the town at all.

Sulfurus : just randomly said he had the cop check, but I assume this is to get some reactions to it. Hasn't really said much since..

n00bking / grokken/ fidei: has actually tried to get more explanations / reactions out of people which is good for the village imo.

silentwarrior : really is kinda silent.. .

It's really hard to tell, especially since it is in the beginning of the game, but seeing that Kelsier has alot of experience and is only trying to create chaos, is worrying for me. Some others which seems untrustworthy aren't making a mess out of the rest of the town, so for me MoosyDoosy and Kelsier are the most dangerous at this moment..

On July 12 2015 13:07 Half the Sky wrote:
.......

If you're town you shouldn't be doing this.

What do you think on the most widely (not just me) discussed potential scum if you aren't? (scott/nydus/sulfurus)

On July 12 2015 22:07 KelsierSC wrote:


I will send out the message from my cabin but I see no reason to abandon my sanctuary to the "chaotic" game I created.

Groken and Wp look like scum so far . Terrible list posts early in the game.

On July 12 2015 22:43 WonnaPlay wrote:
"Sheep me, I'm good at this game" or "I act as scum and see if anyone bites, then I attack them" - Onegu Card?

So basically Kelsier is trying to get newer players to attack him, because he is sowing nonsense. To see if other people just blatantly follow those new players, which means that those followers or "sheep" are probably mafia players looking to get an easy kill?

If this is what he's doing, then I think that his posts make more sense indeed, however I think it's provoking the wrong reactions in a newbie game.

On July 13 2015 01:35 Fidei86 wrote:


Moosy if you aren't going to defend yourself, you're gonna get lynched. If you're town, it's your duty to defend yourself.

On July 13 2015 02:03 Fidei86 wrote:
Well there's been plenty said about you, and the thread is not that long. Care to respond to any of it?

On July 13 2015 02:00 n00bKing wrote:

Players may not vote for themselves. So the vote count posted on Page 12 is not completely accurate.

On July 13 2015 02:43 Fidei86 wrote:
So I'm sitting here thinking "n00b just made a big case on Moosy, then immediately defended him and now wants to lynch elsewhere - classic scum tell!". But then I thought about it and realised that my approach has been exactly the same. I want Moosy to engage, since everything we have on him at the moment is tonal, and could be bad/lazy town. Bleh.

On July 13 2015 03:32 Fidei86 wrote:
You're asking people to vote for you? You very rarely see town do that.

On July 13 2015 03:43 TJHuggins wrote:

Can you explain to me how I am supposed to differentiate "shitty townie" play from Mafia play? The way your posts are reading to me now it sounds like you are a mafia resigned to their fate. If that's not the case then what is your play here? Do you have anyone you think is mafia? Anyone that you think is town? Any reasons for those reads? Any reasoning for why you have been writing/acting like a 14 year old for the last 12 hours? I'm going to be seriously upset if you are lynched and flip town because all that I will be thinking is: "What the fuck?"

On July 13 2015 08:55 GhandiEAGLE wrote:
Sorry about being useless/afk, small stuff that takes priority came up. From now on I have my full attention on the game, will drop in my current reads (spoilers; I don't trust Moose) later.

On July 13 2015 09:38 Half the Sky wrote:


LOL...

anyhow....if you are town, you are in a good position to tell us who the scummers - if any - were on your wagon. Who do you think they were?

On July 13 2015 10:09 silentwarrior wrote:


You can post like 1 minute before night ends. That way, mafia can't kill you for whatever you say, as they don't have time to react.