|
On July 06 2015 13:31 rsoultin wrote:
ksc, geript (w/ a grain of salt after joat lol) strongest townreads
still deciding on whether or not i like the clarity push...i don't really get the logic on the "no way hf and i are both scum" bit
marv could be scum
agree to disagree on harkon ls xP but if he's new (and i think he is?) i can see the lack of reads and the weird thought process early, so will wait and see on that
some other gut reads but nothing solid lol
also @ oats:
xPxPxPxPxP
Hey you got it.
Totes a scumtell
|
Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv??
Do you have any reads at all?
Trfel taking hf absolutely not seriously seems really fake. Too casual. Rsoul randomly defending dude and continuing with the xP is also completely scum.
Like seriously every single post, there is xP and it doesn't even fit her tone half the time.
Vote:rsoul.
I didn't check, this game is not majority lynch right? It's the other one?
|
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
|
On July 06 2015 19:47 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
What?
|
On July 06 2015 19:53 Clarity_nl wrote:
I have no idea which post you're talking about. Maybe it's time to actually use your brainwords?
Im sure you know exactly which post im talking about.
|
Im not gonna bother voting in the voting thread, just assume my vote is on clarity.
Even boxer who isnt even you knows what im talking about clarity.
|
|
|
On July 06 2015 20:59 Harkon wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 16:37 Holyflare wrote:
I also have no idea why you repeatedly jump to people's defences before they even speak for themselves. Not only does it inhibit people playing the game and getting their groove on but it constantly gives the people under pressure multiple outs and feelings of less pressure. Back off and go to bed. You're messing with things you don't understand. Take away the assholery and I agree with this post. Rsoultin might be mafia for this. Trfel has been really awkward so far. It seems like he is desperately trying to seem casual and derail the thread. I wouldn't mind one of those questions but this just doesn't look genuine. Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 15:11 Trfel wrote:
Any thoughts on private versus public education systems? Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 15:18 Trfel wrote:On July 06 2015 15:17 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 15:12 Trfel wrote:On July 06 2015 15:11 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 15:07 Trfel wrote:On July 06 2015 15:05 scott31337 wrote:On July 06 2015 14:51 Trfel wrote:
Hi!
What's up? What reads do you have so far? What's interested you so far? I don't have any reads. LightningStrike and ruXxar seem a bit interesting, though. Maybe rsoultin... (I'm almost 20 pages back, though  ) a truffle caring about an rsoul? that's interesting in and of itself Oh shush, you... Maybe it's a good thing we haven't played together for a few months  lol xP good thing we weren't playing together in that newbie game you mean Talk about something other than mafia.... How are those Spanish classes going? Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 16:42 Trfel wrote:
Hey Holyflare, you noticed I got first place in the TL Mafia Fantasy Proleague group, right? Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 17:28 Trfel wrote:
Side note, why are girls so confusing.... (and no, I'm not talking about anyone in this game) At this point I think this is forced.
whos smurf are you?
|
|
|
It kinda does matter actually.
|
On July 06 2015 21:45 marvellosity wrote:
you missed ritoky
are you done with your town magic shit?
Cause that wasnt very magical.
I want a refund.
|
On July 06 2015 21:59 KelsierSC wrote:
ok so i looked at the first 4 pages in each game
4 page analysis, xP count
himalayas - 6
Noir - 11
hajime - 9
ass - 13
nsm - 8
carnival - 14
Gaiden 11
I think the amount over the first few pages isn't that indicative
##unvote
wait wtf?
she had 25 over the first 4 pages of this game.
Your analysis sucks man.
|
##vote Rsoul
Lol kel, shes talking about you.
My point is 100% accurate, you just suck at gathering data. xP .
|
So you intentionally referred to yourself in 3rd person.
Weirdo.
|
On July 06 2015 23:03 KelsierSC wrote:
It feels over the top to say well he is "retarded" for that
|
On July 06 2015 23:11 rsoultin wrote:
Lol ruxx/hf prob scum
Get rekt
To the rest of y'all...learn to read
salty salty.
Do you think geript is mafia?
|
On July 06 2015 23:11 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 23:10 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 06 2015 23:03 KelsierSC wrote:
It feels over the top to say well he is "retarded" for that Are you saying this is mafia indicative???
lol
|
On July 06 2015 23:19 ruXxar wrote:I don't think kelsier is scum. I think it's weird how oats points out stuff and when i question him about it he responds with "lol". Why did you point out that it was over the top if you didn't think it was alignment indicative?
Do you think that people who refer to themselves in 3rd person are weird?
|
On July 06 2015 23:33 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 06 2015 23:19 ruXxar wrote:On July 06 2015 23:16 marvellosity wrote:
*whispers to ruXxar*
he's not I don't think kelsier is scum. I think it's weird how oats points out stuff and when i question him about it he responds with "lol". Why did you point out that it was over the top if you didn't think it was alignment indicative? Do you think that people who refer to themselves in 3rd person are weird? Not in the context presented. In general, yes. My point is: Why do you point it out if you don't think it's alignment indicative?
Because hes weird.
Im not sure where you are going with this, people post fluff all the time.
|
On July 06 2015 23:38 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 23:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 06 2015 23:33 ruXxar wrote:On July 06 2015 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 06 2015 23:19 ruXxar wrote:On July 06 2015 23:16 marvellosity wrote:
*whispers to ruXxar*
he's not I don't think kelsier is scum. I think it's weird how oats points out stuff and when i question him about it he responds with "lol". Why did you point out that it was over the top if you didn't think it was alignment indicative? Do you think that people who refer to themselves in 3rd person are weird? Not in the context presented. In general, yes. My point is: Why do you point it out if you don't think it's alignment indicative? Because hes weird. Im not sure where you are going with this, people post fluff all the time. I was wondering if you thought it was alignment indicative since you pointed it out, and I'm not getting a clear answer from you.
its obviously not alignment indicative.
Like.
Come on man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
