i'm pretty sure you can have a read of ass kissing without town reading the other person, or at least having them as null, i'ts fine to town read one person and not another if they have done similar things but actually have scummy things thrown in which kelsiers case highlighted (not having a read on gb or w/e), i don't agree that it's scummy

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 17:25 GMT

#532

if anything im a bit wary of mocsta too but maybe i just don't remember how he plays, he's jumping all over little things that don't make people mafia and is very flippant based on whoever people are scum reading

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 17:43 GMT

#535

he didn't say you were mafia at all?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 17:48 GMT

#537

I did and I just told you I can see someone saying that even if they have a null read on you

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 18:24 GMT

#547

On March 07 2015 02:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I understand what you are saying.
I dont understand kelsiers comment in explaining why ve is mafia.
Like one of the reasons why he read ve mafia for is because ve was "kissing my ass". Not once does he mention the scum-scum interaction possibility. Now see his other reads. They are different. They do not have only one conclusion. This one has, then he backs off from it.

Thre is no way kelsir thinks i am mafia with what he said. No way. Koshi guarantee.

Wait what he called you mafia?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 23:21 GMT

#616

On March 07 2015 07:49 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

Exactly.

Have in mind that I'm saying he COULD be Mafia. I don't actually have a read on him.

My main scum read is HF. Yes, even more than Robik

doesn't even make sense, especially as you haven't addressed anything I've said and then completely skipped over soren who hasn't really done much today since you left and you yelled at when you should be thinking he was mafia instead

instead you went for robik because he was uninterested in solving the game and was afk but somehow you made that read based on the first hour or so of the game???? i'm also voting for robik which you seem to neglect

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 23:47 GMT

#619

Lol what?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 06 2015 23:49 GMT

#620

On March 07 2015 08:47 GlowingBear wrote:
That's why I'm not calling him certain Mafia?

Tell me town motivation, instead.

Also, I'm amazed that no one is questioning if Mocsta really softed. Specially you Robik. You called me stupid for my conclusion when the possibly most questionable thing was the assumption Mocsta actually softed.

Hey mocsta did you soft a role not in the game?
Yes/no, end nowhere

Silly gb what are you even doing

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 00:08 GMT

#632

You have posted 0 reasoning for me being mafia? You've posted a lot of reasons for robik to be mafia and even made it seem like you were sure.

I'm somehow your biggest mafia read? Horse shit much?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 00:15 GMT

#635

Summarising: I'm not actually pushing a lynch, I am trying to gather information and to understand people's motives, and also gather reactions so I can actually have better reads.

Top 2 scum reads. 1 of them is me who you haven't asked a single question to, haven't bothered to even provide information to the thread about me and I'm your top read and haven't even evaluated that 2 people you also called mafia (mocsta/robik) i also called mafia/am voting for.

Your stance on robik is just that he's not playing and that's it. I don't see where you're trying to solve anything, you're just static and not doing anything useful.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 00:16 GMT

#636

On March 07 2015 09:13 GlowingBear wrote:

Show nested quote +

I know it. And I'm saying it repeatedly. It worries me that nobody else is inquiring me that.

Let's start like this: why are you reading me as scum? I know the reasons but I want your words here. That's the main reason I'm calling you scum.

I wasn't reading you as mafia.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 00:16 GMT

#637

Jesus you people really just don't learn..

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 00:56 GMT

#640

On March 07 2015 09:20 GlowingBear wrote:
My stance on Robik is the same thing you said I'm doing: he is static and doing nothing.
I am trying to gather information when nobody else is.

Please reread this paragraph and tell me it's a joke?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 10:33 GMT

#663

Gb I'm voting for your main scum read and you didn't even ask me why yet you still think I'm calling you mafia. I made that case on you to start discussion and it worked and I wasn't really scum reading you. Your reads are bad though.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 10:41 GMT

#665

Not particularly bothered if you think that but being lazy doesn't make me mafia.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 10:45 GMT

#667

I have no idea how you have any of your reads mocsta where has your slam dunk captain fail slip gone?

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 10:53 GMT

#669

No i don't agree that kelsier is mafia. Gb even reread him and came to the same conclusion but still thinks I'm mafia for it lololol

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 11:00 GMT

#671

All i know about tormented is that he knows kelsier/gb were wagons but town reads gb and doesn't scum read kelsier. Literally don't knkw anything about what he thinks

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 11:04 GMT

#673

It really was

Holyflare

United Kingdom30774 Posts

March 07 2015 11:08 GMT

#675

Yeh that's why I'm voting him, policy+chance he's mafia+ ruin stats