I think sqrt's early arguments are bad and that he didn't try to contribute when thread was heated. He just said hi and went off. Then came back, post shitty lists without reasoning, and goes offline again.

It's not a plynch, is a strong scum read lynch.

It's different from you that lurked all the game and didn't fake contributing.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 13:46 GMT

#743

I mean, the guy isn't even trying to figure the game properly and simply drops a vote on me and says UNTIL TUESDAY.

Lol...

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 13:55 GMT

#744

On October 13 2014 22:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
If you could explain why your play is different from that other game linked, that would be cool.

I don't see much difference to be honest and I surely can't explain. I'd say I always play differently each game.

Maybe you'll see that my scum play isn't like what I'm doing here. You can check Mission Minimafia, where I replaced 3d12.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:04 GMT

#746

On October 13 2014 22:18 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

You could make a slamdunk case on practically anyone in the game, be around a bit before deadline, post a shitton and convince either VE/rayn or DP not to lynch you but lynch the dude you posted about.
Other than that, its a bit hard.

What you said, 6-7 people are inactive therefore passive. not all of them are scum. At most 50% are. Therefore passivity isnt exclusive to scum and isnt a scumtell.

I can't make a slamdunk case when I'm arguing that someone has a lack of posting. The hugest problem in sqrt is that he lacks posting AND when he posts he fakes contributing when he is not.
So, regarding sqrt:

1) He is constantly lurking
2) When he comes to the thread, he doesn't contribute to he ongoing discussion. Just says hi and goes lurking.
3) When he posts reads, he does not explain motives behind it. Just makes a list and goes into lurking again
4) When inquired to explain reads, arguments are forced (CR trying to inflate filter was too much for my heart)
5) Votes on a townie and says won't be posting until day2

Come on...

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:05 GMT

#747

On October 13 2014 23:00 Damdred wrote:
Mission mafia is probably not the best thing to point to because you replaced in with only a cycle or two to go. And had special rules that you had to submit to or die. This game is probably your scum meta, its pretty close to arnie but is a bit more refined and it shares some characteristics of your play here.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/466211-tl-mafia-lxviii-fanfic-crossover-edition?user=GlowingBear

GB did you ever answer the question I posted to you?

What question?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:08 GMT

#750

My gameplay this game is very different from fanfic

THERE you will find a lot of fluff. A LOT.

I am trying much more here to solve the game than I was in there.
Like, really damdred, I woke up and all I did until now was skim through the topic and answer questions

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:09 GMT

#751

On October 13 2014 23:08 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

Tell me why scum does that.

Because he doesn't care. He just drops his vote and whoever gets lynched, it's fine, because there is already townies being voted. He simply does not care.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:09 GMT

#752

On October 13 2014 23:06 Damdred wrote:

Show nested quote +

probably missed it do to autocorrect

Rephrase it so I can understand it lol

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:32 GMT

#756

On October 13 2014 23:21 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

but he has to know its gonna cause huge controversy.
How many scum players you know claim scum in their first post, then play like this?

The "too scum to be scum" player

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:36 GMT

#758

On October 13 2014 23:14 Damdred wrote:
In your filter you called me town repeatedly and then when you came under pressure you said that you were ready to rescend it. Mostly it seems that this was due to me being absent from the thread correct? And that I was to passive?

But then even though you say these things you never make mention of it again or try to scum read me later on either, it all feels like you are trying to negate pressure on you with some of your reads at that point.

Ok got it.

You were absent and not pushing your reads so it made me have second thoughts on your gameplay. But you said you're traveling so I decided to give you more time. I have stronger reads than you so why should I focus someone I have leaning town than focusing my scum reads?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:37 GMT

#759

On October 13 2014 23:34 Oatsmaster wrote:

Show nested quote +

They dont exist.

They do.
I'm one.

If you keep believing someone is "too scum to be scum", you'll let a lot of obvious scum slip through your fingers

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 14:38 GMT

#760

I'm heading to work right now so I won't be posting anymore.
I'll check the thread from hour to hour but I won't be playing much now.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 15:49 GMT

#763

I don't understand why people sign in to play the game when they actually are not going to play the game.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 15:59 GMT

#764

Lynch sqrt with me oats. You won't get people to lynch ritoky and we can always reevaluate our reads on him during d2 since he posted a fair amount of information

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

October 13 2014 16:28 GMT

#766

On October 14 2014 01:03 geript wrote:
@VE. How sure are you of that meta read on GB? Also what you think of oats?

I'll anticipate his answer: not so sure.

He played with me like.. 2 times? And he only reviewed my most recent town game.
There's no much difference between then