| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 07:37 DarthPunk wrote: Yeah I think so too. Rayn what do you think of the Holyflare push on myself and hopeless? I don't think anything Holyflare says makes you mafia. I don't even know if he really thinks you are mafia or not, but we'll see. There are some fair points on Hopeless. His stance / him talking about this scooby-doo thingy is weird. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 07:41 DarthPunk wrote: Why don't you think it is a good post? He is right, you being away for an hour is not alignment indicative. Read the post again, in fact read the whole conversation again. I'll be back after i make coffee and a cigarrette. Let's see if you got what i did before that.  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 07:47 Coagulation wrote: how about you clarify on why my "post was bad" instead of dumping useless trash in thread. u scared? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
DarthPunk makes a post that's useless (as he says himself). Palmar likes the post. I question Palmar about why he likes the post. I don't get a clear answer. Talking about non-alignment indicative shit is in my opinion scummy, or at best useless and i want to know why Palmar thinks there is something alignment indicative in the conversation (otherwise it's not worth to continue it). I ask Palmar this: On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour? Coag comes in with this post: On March 19 2014 07:34 Coagulation wrote: (1): its being implied its scummy cause u coulda went and got organized in a scum QT rayn. (2): but its actually null cause you coulda just went and took an hour long shit for all anyone here fucking knows. (1): Now if Palmar thinks this is the case he should call me mafia right? (2): If this is the case he should stop the conversation as it's useless as Coag says. Coag joins the discussion in the most useless way i have seen. He does not provide conclusions on me, nor does he provide conclusions on Palmar. He is not interested in if Palmar thinks i am mafia or not, he is not interested in if i am mafia or not, he just provides two scenarios and says "no can do". He does not care why Palmar called DarthPunk's post good in the first place and because what he says here in his (2) he should care. Useless post that joins a discussion without providing any insight of his own and no intention to figure out any alignments. ![[image loading]](http://i59.tinypic.com/ncfvqe.png) | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 07:55 Palmar wrote: An observation doesn't have to be weird. I could make the observation that VE has basically just left the thread, but I don't think it's particularly alignment indicative, he has been quite shit on early days as town in recent games so it doesn't make him scum. That's my point. Do you think it somehow helps us finding mafia if i say "hey tehpoofer has not posted"? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:06 DarthPunk wrote: Rayn you say that he provides no insight of his own. Would you not say that calling it null is not an insight? Like it is a irrelevant conclusion but it is still a conclusion. The point is he just drops a comment that's non-alignment indicative towards every direction. There is nothing, the post achieves nothing and is designed to achieve nothing. If that's kush he is mafia. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:07 Palmar wrote: The point is that Coag is basically answering a question for me without considering my position or my possible alignment. bingo! | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On February 20 2014 22:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's this post and the conversation that took place after that: Does it look like kush really cares about his question? Because the bolded part is an answer to his question. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:15 Koshi wrote: @rayn, pretty sure it isn't Coag and therefore it is very likely Kush but can't use meta if we don't know who it is. It doesn't really matter who it is. The post is scummy as fuck regardless. But if it's kush he's totally scum. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:30 Holyflare wrote: This question is also relevant to 3/4 of the thread you know. I read that coag post completely differently though. What is interesting to see is how it was pointed out that dp being overdefensive was scummy (by coag) but then they completely went over the overdefensive line in response to you. I deal with the rest of the people later. Now i am talking to Coag. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
I make a case which is that Coag made a post that is completely useless and has no intention to figure out who is mafia. Coag tells me i am selling bullshit. I ask him what did his post try to achieve in terms of moving the thread forward or scumhunting. If Coag is town he has an answer to my question and he will tell me what he was trying to achieve with the post. If he does not have an answer he is mafia because i can't possibly be "selling bullshit" because then his post in fact is bad and does not try to achieve anything, which is my case. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote: of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote: the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
When i read the post i actually thought Coag meant i was trying to start a bandwagon on Palmar which would make a bit more sense (although it's false) but there DEFINITELY was no abdwagon starting on me lol. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
