|
On March 20 2014 22:36 Holyflare wrote:
(still think giggle is scummy though) it makes perfect sense for dp to sit back on him and not say anything about the case he was waiting for only for giggle to say bus me i have no time in qt and then dp to start pushing for him out of the blue
I said ages ago. If this dude doesn't come back and make a fucking huge recovery he is scum. This is like early day one. Read my filter.
He didn't so now I want to lynch him.
|
On March 20 2014 22:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
DarthPunk why does this look townie and contributes to scumhunting:
Djo: "Koshi is townie because he looked town before he voted for me and he gave reasons for his vote. Oats did not give reasons for his vote so he does not look townie.
Djo: "Oats why did you vote for me?"
rayn: "What are you talking about, Oats is voting for you for the exact same reasons Koshi is. Read his posts."
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me?"
Djo: "Also Oats looked town before his vote on me but because of his vote he does not any more."
Someone: "Oats is voting for you because of what Koshi has already said."
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me?"
Oats: [makes a more detailed post about why he is voting for Djo]
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me? Can you tell the reasons so we can discuss it?"
Oats: [quotes his post]
Djo: [does not post any more]
care to explain DP?
I didn't say that it contributed to scum hunting. I said he was willing to discuss things which makes me want to give him some time over GT who is absent.
|
On March 20 2014 22:42 Holyflare wrote:
Yes really? Either you agree with my case or not. Stop this pointless crap oats. Pages mean nothing.
Dp did not want to vote giggle until he heard his case on me despite me saying giggle was so scunmy. Giggle posts case DP SAYS NOTHING ABOUT IT EVER DESPITE GIGGLES CASE BEING THE EXACT POINTS DP RAISES ABOUT ME and then out of the blue dp starts pushing giggle based off sheeping the idea that he isn't around cz it's a pet peeve and scum tell rather than the guy he thinks is 100% scum (poofter) who he made a case on without questioning and djo who he thinks is scum but in every post hints that he is town
I posted about it at the start of day one you fucking moron.
5 hours into the day
On March 19 2014 10:30 DarthPunk wrote:
Although. If GT doesn't post his case on HF then I will probs want to lynch him. People saying they will do something and not following through is a pet peeve, and quite often scum indicative.
|
On March 20 2014 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 22:38 DarthPunk wrote:On March 20 2014 22:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
DarthPunk why does this look townie and contributes to scumhunting:
Djo: "Koshi is townie because he looked town before he voted for me and he gave reasons for his vote. Oats did not give reasons for his vote so he does not look townie.
Djo: "Oats why did you vote for me?"
rayn: "What are you talking about, Oats is voting for you for the exact same reasons Koshi is. Read his posts."
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me?"
Djo: "Also Oats looked town before his vote on me but because of his vote he does not any more."
Someone: "Oats is voting for you because of what Koshi has already said."
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me?"
Oats: [makes a more detailed post about why he is voting for Djo]
Djo: "Oats why are you voting for me? Can you tell the reasons so we can discuss it?"
Oats: [quotes his post]
Djo: [does not post any more]
care to explain DP? I didn't say that it contributed to scum hunting. I said he was willing to discuss things which makes me want to give him some time over GT who is absent. But he is not really discussing things. He is not interested in finding out HIMSELF why people do things. He wants everything on a silver platter and is not interested in looking for reasons why people post what they do. If you open Oats' filter and look at the posts regarding his Djo vote and think about it EVEN FOR 5 SECONDS it's 100% clear why Oats is voting for him. Not only is he incapable of doing so he is also incapable of taking answers regarding it because multiple people have explained to him why Oats is voting for him. Yet he keeps asking the same shit over and over again. Also his reads regarding Koshi/Oats/thrawn is total shit and nowhere near reasonable. And that's everything he has done this game besides calling himself mafia (agreeing with people's cases on him and calling them good).
I know he is not doing it well. I posted about that in my case on him. But that doesn't change the fact taht I would rather lynch GT today when he is more scummy in my eyes and is not even contributing as much as djo.
You won't change my mind unless djo basically claims scum.
|
On March 20 2014 22:45 Holyflare wrote:
And he did post his case which you never responded to.... Zzzzz good waiting many town dp
Yeah and it was not satisfactory and he left before I could ask him anything. So I want to lynch him.
|
On March 20 2014 22:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
VIVAX:
You said you were on page 40 when you stated your scumreads were Hopeless/thrawn.
However in your cases you present later every piece of evidence you point out happens after page 40.
Should i lynch you for this? And if not, why? Because i think you are full of shit.
Holy shit are you serious?
|
|
|
End of page 40 for me: March 19 2014 12:03
March 20 2014 01:55 Hopeless1der wrote:
March 20 2014 06:03 Hopeless1der wrote:
Yeah it works out. HAHAHA that would be so funny if Vivax claimed scum like that.
|
Wait I can't find the posts that hopeless made at the date quoted.
|
On March 20 2014 23:03 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 21:56 DarthPunk wrote:On March 20 2014 21:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok I know what Im thinking now.
DONT LYNCH GT, lynch DJO! LOL. oats is town. Based on that?
Yeah. It was a funny plan to get the target he wanted lynched over the one I wanted. Stuff like that seems really townie to me.
|
On March 19 2014 10:03 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 10:02 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 09:58 Holyflare wrote:
How is my case on hopeless crap? He called me scum based off of 1 game where I did the same thing despite him actively reading and referencing another game where I did the same thing and was town. He has also played a game with me where we were both scum and I posted coherently. What is there not to understand DP and why are you not reading into it anymore or asking people about it since this coag thing is over? People make bad meta cases all the time as both alignments. It does not make someone guaranteed scum. So why does making a bad meta case make someone scum HF? If that was the case then you should be 100% scum. But you are not because people make bad meta cases all the time as either alignment. i cannot believe you actually believe what you write because that is flat out fucking retarded. It's different if the meta case is based off of games you weren't in but HE WAS ACTIVELY READING THEM
On March 19 2014 11:36 Hopeless1der wrote:
HF insists his reads are legit, unless he's recanted his DP read somewhere that I missed. His case on DP was such a farce I question how he ever earned the championship belt.
It was on page 43.
I'm not sure that is something he should be lynched over after all.
he did say ~page 40
|
On March 20 2014 23:09 Koshi wrote:
There is something wrong with these timemarks on TL. I see a post at 03:36 and then when I quoted it becomes 11:36. How fucking stupid is that?
Yeah. it is all fucked up. just search hopeless filter for the word legit.
|
On March 20 2014 23:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 23:09 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 10:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2014 10:02 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 09:58 Holyflare wrote:
How is my case on hopeless crap? He called me scum based off of 1 game where I did the same thing despite him actively reading and referencing another game where I did the same thing and was town. He has also played a game with me where we were both scum and I posted coherently. What is there not to understand DP and why are you not reading into it anymore or asking people about it since this coag thing is over? People make bad meta cases all the time as both alignments. It does not make someone guaranteed scum. So why does making a bad meta case make someone scum HF? If that was the case then you should be 100% scum. But you are not because people make bad meta cases all the time as either alignment. i cannot believe you actually believe what you write because that is flat out fucking retarded. It's different if the meta case is based off of games you weren't in but HE WAS ACTIVELY READING THEM On March 19 2014 11:36 Hopeless1der wrote:
HF insists his reads are legit, unless he's recanted his DP read somewhere that I missed. His case on DP was such a farce I question how he ever earned the championship belt. It was on page 43. I'm not sure that is something he should be lynched over after all. he did say ~page 40 So is page 60 also "around page 40"?
Which quote came from page 60?
|
OK yeah that vote from hopeless came from page 70 lol
|
|
|
On March 20 2014 23:13 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 23:08 Holyflare wrote:
He has thepoofter as scum for being a confirmed liar to him and that was a 100% scum read but he isn't voting him because the afk scum tell that he has on the guy that posted the same logic he used on me was obviously stronger than 100% to then speedy unvote because page numbers didn't match up
If rayn was correct which I see no reason to doubt at the time, he slipped. why would I not vote for him lol?|
|
On March 20 2014 23:16 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 23:14 DarthPunk wrote:On March 20 2014 23:13 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2014 23:08 Holyflare wrote:
He has thepoofter as scum for being a confirmed liar to him and that was a 100% scum read but he isn't voting him because the afk scum tell that he has on the guy that posted the same logic he used on me was obviously stronger than 100% to then speedy unvote because page numbers didn't match up If rayn was correct which I see no reason to doubt at the time, he slipped. why would I not vote for him lol?| HOW IS IT A SLIP WHEN A TOWN DID THE SAME THING IN TITANIC 2 NOT TO MENTION 60 IS 40 PAGES IN NOT TO MENTION YOU ARE SCUM
I don't know why you are chainsaw defending vivax like this to be honest. Like is it not fucking weird to you that he lied about the point in the game he was?
Part of his case came from page 70 so, like, How the fuck is that page 40 lol.?
|
On March 20 2014 23:19 Palmar wrote:
I'm totally okay with lynching vivax based on the fact he hasn't produced 40 posts. It's solid logic.
Still think GT is scum
As do I. But vivax basically claimed scum.
|
On March 20 2014 23:22 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 23:20 DarthPunk wrote:On March 20 2014 23:19 Palmar wrote:
I'm totally okay with lynching vivax based on the fact he hasn't produced 40 posts. It's solid logic.
Still think GT is scum As do I. But vivax basically claimed scum. Can you explain how so I can just sheep it and go afk?
He made a case, whilst representing that he was on page 40 and catching up with the thread, with evidence for that case coming from the future of the thread which he had not read.
Rayn explained it pretty clearly lol. Not sure what is difficult about this to understand.
|
On March 20 2014 23:24 Holyflare wrote:
What benefit does mafia have from lying about a god damn fact checkable page number? You flat out unvoted a 100% scum suspect confirmed liar to vote someone who agreed with you but was afk because you were sheeping sentiment and said nothint about his case that followd your logic now the second someone says something aboit page numbers not adding up you unvote from your 2 TOP scum reads because...? Oh yeh page numbers totally scum slip ggggg so much pro skill here.
What you don't say and what rayn didn't say is that the reason he could be mafia because of the page number thing is that he picked 2 targets abd used their filters to make cases thus the age numbers do not make sense because he was grasping at straws to make cases. You do not do that. You don't play this game like a towny.
I mean that is a good point. But why are you (Vivax) making cases then without reading the whole fucking thread? especially taking shit out of the context that you could not possibly understand, cause you know, he hadn't read that part of the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2EsGRl9.png)
