EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 08:36 Balla24 wrote: What's the benefit of claiming green? I've seen it in a lot of old games and i've always been curious. it's because that while townies mostly ignore it, it turns out that there's like a 90% chance that the first guy who asks why someone else is claiming green is scum that's you it's called the kenpachi strategy and it's fool proof | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's called "take a fucking stance or vote for yourself".  Yea that's what I thought, you are actively trying not to take a stand. I don't know who you voted for before but he was not in any danger of getting lynched so there's no reason to change your vote at all, only reason is to say "hey everybody i'm harmless and i don't have an opinion on lynch". And I think this is scummy. ##Vote raynpelikoneet | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am taking no stance because there is no stance to take atm prplhz. If you are seriously saying you think someone is scum at this moment you are lying. Pressuring people is fine but what you are accusing me of is a straight out stretch. But who cares where your vote is at, why even bother to implement a plan that allows people to do nothing. No, I don't expect people to have big scum reads right now but that doesn't mean we need to implement a plan to virtually unvote in an unvote free voting system. It just serves absolutely no purpose. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: prplhz did you even read my posts? Yes. You are unhappy that you can't unvote so you propose that instead of unvoting people should just vote for themselves. I don't know why you think it's a problem that people can't unvote, if anything that's a plus for town. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
I also agree with marvellosity that it doesn't make sense that scum would hard push a silly slightly scummy plan in thread like this. I don't like that suki says in this post: On February 20 2014 09:46 suki wrote: I agree that finding a way to 'unvote' is stupid. I don't think it makes me lean scum or town on rayn either way. that the plan is stupid but neither scummy nor townie and then she says in this post On February 20 2014 11:00 suki wrote: Here's how I see it. Because you're forced to vote someone, you can't unvote and remain without an opinion (well, except with this stupid plan). This is pro-town. If someone voted Koshi and said, 'I don't think Koshi is scum anymore' but kept his vote on Koshi, then pressuring that person to take a stance on someone else IS pro-town because they can't just unvote and say 'I dont know I'm thinking'. It forces accountability, and mafia hate being accountable for their actions. This outweighs scum possibly misrepresenting someone because they didn't take off their vote. that the plan is anti-town, or something like that, she uses pro-town to describe a situation where the plan is not implemented. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 11:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: So what was your reasoning for unvoting as town or as mafia? I guarantee as mafia it's most likely "because i would do that as town" as in "i try to look townie" because that's why you do things as mafia right? So we can exclude that part. What was your reasoning for unvote as town? top kek You don't think there was ever a scum who was like "Shit, I need to get my vote off of this guy because this vote is a little silly and it's attracting attention to me. I guess I'll try to do it in a townie way." The whole "scum act like town so we can never catch them"-idea is silly. Scum can't perfectly act like town and the more we force them to act the less they look like town (ideally). | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 11:43 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also this is why prplhz is mafia. It's an obvious contradiction that makes no sense. ##unvote ##Vote: prplhz There is no contradiction. First I say that the plan is bad and townies have no reason to push it or come up with it. Then I say that the way you pushed it seems atypical for scum. I am not even talking about the same thing in the two sentences. If it's conflicting because I first say that I have reason to believe you are scum and then I say I have reason to believe you are town then sure, I agree. That happens to everybody all the time though and anyway, it's not a contradiction. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 12:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: No it's a total contradiction. I guarantee you noone does that as town. He is mafia. What if someone does that at town? Also, what is "that"? Saying allegedly contradicting statements or this pair of statements specifically? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
if you want to lynch someone for using hyperbole then you're a moron | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
is VIVAX420 kushmasta? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
| ||
