EPTWe lose a nightkill to to get rid of an obvious townie. Thats not nothing. And then we start day 3 the same as day 2 but without a strong townie.
[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia: The Reboot - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
We lose a nightkill to to get rid of an obvious townie. Thats not nothing. And then we start day 3 the same as day 2 but without a strong townie. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I can quite easily imagine a townie just wanting Coag gone regardless of his alignment - that's not too far away from my own position. No no, you see, his reasons are all bad. Like emotional reasons that have nothing to do with Coag's alignment, not at all like LM's reasons. Also his vote on johnny, the reasons were just rehashed and rephrased from what other people said and it was totally unnecessary, nobody to convince, felt a lot like he was doing it to avoid sheeping. So what? I've seen scum make good points about other people. I again don't see what your problem is here. yeah but normally when someone is null on another person, they have good and bad reasons. All of sidesprangs reasons on hopeless are why he is town, then he turns around and says "All easy posts to make as scum", like he totally not committing to a read.. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
. It would have looked pretty silly for him to give his thoughts on a bunch of other people and then say "By the way, I'm voting this dude I didn't even mention in this post". YEAH EXACTLY. HE CARED HOW HIS POST LOOKED. THATS SCUMMY AQUA. The hopeless thing just really felt like he was trying so hard to be null on hopeless. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Thanks Balla. I would say hopeless looks the worse from that, he played with Coag enough to know how he plays. Aqua felt really genuinely trying to understand why sidesprang was scum but his vote was not needed and felt like he just said stuff to avoid sheeping. I dunno, but dont lynch till like day 4-5 if he stops playing. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On February 12 2014 12:31 Hopeless1der wrote: Oats after waching the "town seal" ban list discussion unfold I had a hard time with coag. When he continued to assume I was out to get him by claiming everyone was out to get him because of slam.... I decided he was too big of a liability to leave alive. At this point I'm happy to assume he is town. I'll post a full list post with (redundant) reasoning for each player still alive before day post tomorrow. I dont see how any of this makes him scum as opposed to bad/angry though. How many games did you play with coag before this one? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On February 12 2014 06:45 Aquanim wrote: Ha! Do your worst Coag. Reading his filter again, it's still marginal but I think there was a significant amount more thought going into his posts in the newbie, rather than just summarising the thread (which more accurately describes here). Can't say I'm hugely confident in this one but ##Unvote ##Vote: Sidesprang I point out a lotta specific points and it comes down to a general meta read that isnt very detailed that makes you pretty much 180? Especially since it was 5/4 in coag's favor so you didnt even need to change. | ||
| ||
