EPTI also think Bum's retraction from VE is super scummy and don't fault Zarepath for thinking so as well.
Normal Mini Mafia: Episode I - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I also think Bum's retraction from VE is super scummy and don't fault Zarepath for thinking so as well. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 22 2014 03:30 JonnyLaw wrote: I agree with Rayn on this point. Zerepath literally took the time to make a case, didn't push it at all then calls bum scum for making the same case and actually trying to get it pushed into a lynch. wrong. Bum's right, if your case isn't getting traction why waste people's time. If bum really think's VE's scum he can always wait and try to get him lynched later. I hate this logic. Also if town Bum really thought that VE wasn't worth pursuing he should have a better target no? Rather than just saying 'welp no ones listening to me I guess I'll just withdraw from the game' @balla It took me a minute to understand what the hell that post is saying. But yes it is contradicting his case completely. Backwards ass logic. He's scum for being defensive and he's scum for saying fuck it, lynch me if I'm scum. wrong again, those are two different things. Zarepath: VE switched to bum with no justification -> VE is suspicious -> Zarepath provides a case against VE and votes him. When Zarepath switched to Bum likewise he also gave his reasons. I don't see what you're saying is 'kinda bad' here. On January 22 2014 03:56 JonnyLaw wrote: Yeah, your last post sealed it for me. Your explanation for bum being scummy is that he took his vote off VE when no one would follow his lead. You took your vote off VE when you thought it was an easy thing to do. They're not obviously different at all. ... He tried to back up his case for two days and it gained no traction. You abandoned yours after two fucking minutes when VE said lynch me if I'm scum. You literally have one post saying I made a case and that's it. After that it's like total 180 and you jump on the same person VE has his vote on. Zarepath admitted he was tunneling and backed off. This is different than bum backing off for no reason even after VE failed to satisfyingly answer bum's questions. Jumping on the same person VE has his vote on when he still finds VE suspicious is bad, though. I didn't catch that. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 22 2014 04:50 JonnyLaw wrote: Suki your basic idea is that zarepath cannot be scum because he brings up his case ONE time after making it then drops it all together? If there are two lynch candidates and you're one of them don't you pick option b regardless of alignment? His switch to bum was an easy choice imo. Uh if you're town you push the person you think is the scummiest, regardless if that person is a candidate or not. If bum is scum, which I think he is, then I don't see scum zarepath voting for bum. It doesn't make sense. From my point of view either zarepath or bum are scum. It doesn't make sense for both of them to be scum. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 22 2014 05:52 bumatlarge wrote: I was giving zarepath a free place to put his vote as long as I was intent on lynching VE. His reaction to my unvote has alot of motivation behind it. At the time, Crossfire was gaining some traction, for an iffy post. Zare could have hopped on him, which I think is worth noting if one of them flips scum. Kush seems somewhat similar, but that was older votes. I found his vote on me a bit backwards, considering that it was just for not pushing VE some more. I think it would it would be a poor choice for him to make as mafia. But I don't think he seems like he has a lot of experience as mafia. The second scenario where I am scum and he is town is much more unlikely, because he has been on par with my thoughts the whole game, and he changes his mind to me when I stop pursuing both of our top scum reads. That is much more illogical coming from a townie, rather then what I think would be bad reasoning for him to do that as mafia. I actually really really like everything here. Many of these things I didn't consider previously. One other thing I was eyeing was Crossfire's soft defense of Zarepath earlier in the game. Couple this with Zarepath including Crossfire into his list just now (alongside a really stupid desire to lynch WileE)... I think there's a good chance of them being scumbuddies. ##unvote ##vote Zarepath | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I liked bum's retort and it also invalidated several of my reasons for switching off zarepath. Of course now he goes and claims so I have no idea what's going on anymore. -_-; | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
12. Posting a false role PM phrased as if you received it from the host. You can still fake roleclaim, but you cannot make it look like you are posting a PM you received from the host. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
11. Breadcrumbing the specific phrasing of your role PM. Do not compare the phrasing in your role PM to prove your alignment. You can claim the abilities you have, but you can't use the specific phrasing of your role PM. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:46 bumatlarge wrote: I want to see a bluepost before I take my vote off. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
| ||
