|
On June 11 2013 03:58 Hapahauli wrote:So reading through the exchange in the last few pages, I don't think Oats is scum. He's trying to help in his own right, even though he's a bit misguided. Furthermore, his strategy of "antagonize all the vets" seems fairly suicidal for scum to do. Hell last time he attacked me as scum, he ended up getting lynched (Duke Nukem Mafia), so that should be pretty fresh in his mind. Jampi is by far the best lynch for today. He's produced fairly little content, and his vote on Vayne is by far the weakest. Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 00:41 jampidampi wrote:
I can get behind a Vayne lynch. In his two latest posts, he first states that he is not trying to hide anything, but in the second he hides his reasoning even when someone asked for them. Dafug? It might not necessarily mean that he is scum, but do you think you can read him? I know I can't.
##Vote: VayneAuthority
I'll be gone, but will back about one hour before the deadline. Carefully read the underlined passage. Jampi is NOT voting Vayne because he thinks Vayne is scum! He's voting Vayne because "it's hard to read him." That's a scumclaim. ##Vote Lynch: Jampidampi
I'm in a lost state. I can't seem to find scum or town with reasoning, just gut. Yes I wasn't voting for Vayne because what he has said makes him scum. But in my mind, there was no one scummy to vote for. Would it have been to propose a policy lynch on DP out of nowhere? Because in my mind, those where the two realistic lynch options. Everyone else seemed somewhat townie (expect maybe Stutters, but it wasn't like he was giving me any scumvibes).
|
ShiaoPi town
pure gut
Axle town
lays down his whole thought process in the thread
Gravity town
seems to actually want to find alignments of people
others null
all gut reads
|
On June 11 2013 10:53 Hapahauli wrote:
That's not a very compelling reason not to kill you ya know.
I really can't accept the fact that you, who are known for bombing analysis left and right in your newbie games, would all of a sudden be completely lost and provide nothing all of Day 1.
Gimme a scumread other than myself.
|
On June 11 2013 10:57 Blazinghand wrote:
I don't think I believe oats as town any more. Something about it just doesn't smell right to me. I KNOW he's liek this a lot as scum... but still. Does anyone want to lynch him? I'm willing to swap.
I can get behind that for self preservation
|
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum.
|
Look, no one can give scum reads thats not me, how am I supposed to find scum?
|
On June 11 2013 11:03 GravityMan wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 10:59 jampidampi wrote:
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum. Is this even a possibility? This also makes it seem as though this jampidampi was not aware of the presence of closed setups before this point. This post by jampidampi creates a pit in my stomach where I feel he may be newer to this than we may have thought. I will not change my vote at this stage as it allows for too much exploitation by possible mafia members.
I think there is a SK or a survivor, or maybe even both
|
On June 11 2013 11:05 GravityMan wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 11:03 jampidampi wrote:
Look, no one can give scum reads thats not me, how am I supposed to find scum? Is there absolutely nothing that anyone said throughout the entirety of this game that made you think twice? Is there anything at all that might be suspicious in the slightest that you can give us? At this point since you will cease to exist anyway you have nothing to lose, no matter how inane or irrelevant it sounds to you.
Nothing that I can think of so abrutly
|
Or maybe BH for not giving shit and just arguing with oats
|
On June 11 2013 11:07 GravityMan wrote:My posting has been halted by Wave Man and his Flood Control. Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 11:04 jampidampi wrote:On June 11 2013 11:03 GravityMan wrote:On June 11 2013 10:59 jampidampi wrote:
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum. Is this even a possibility? This also makes it seem as though this jampidampi was not aware of the presence of closed setups before this point. This post by jampidampi creates a pit in my stomach where I feel he may be newer to this than we may have thought. I will not change my vote at this stage as it allows for too much exploitation by possible mafia members. I think there is a SK or a survivor, or maybe even both I do not understand what would make you say this.
It's kinda imba if there are only two scum, right?
|
|
|
Well played scum team, well played. It's kinda funny that this game could have ended D2 if scum won the election.
7-3-1
misslynch
6-3-1
nightkill
5-3-1
mayor condemns
4-3-1
and then the survior votes with scum and they have a majority.
|
On June 15 2013 20:19 AxleGreaser wrote:Show nested quote +On June 15 2013 15:01 jampidampi wrote:
Well played scum team, well played. It's kinda funny that this game could have ended D2 if scum won the election.
7-3-1
misslynch
6-3-1
nightkill
5-3-1
mayor condemns
4-3-1
and then the survior votes with scum and they have a majority. Good thing hapa didnt roll scum then also neither the survivor nor the scum mayor would be sure the other existed. but yeah a scum mayor D1 looks bad
Even if scum don't know there is a survivor, it's still D2 LYLO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
