On December 14 2011 09:27 xsksc wrote:
I'm not voting him for his lack of activity, it's his terrible attempts at trying to justify his votes. "reasons others say" and "that scummy post he made" "no other obvious scum"

It's probably more common for townies to vote with apathetic reasons than scum. He's not wrong, per se, because he didn't write anything.

I hate the way he's playing, but I doubt he'll flip scum.

Also that Spaackle guy looks pretty townie to me.

ProfessorBadass

94 Posts

December 14 2011 00:29 GMT

#623

I would agree with you if it was sinani, Palmar, but I don't see anything particularly damning about Nisani and he has been trying to actually play the game lately. sinani and Coagulation are the only policy lynches I would absolutely get behind regardless of what they've posted.

On December 14 2011 09:26 Spaackle wrote:
@ProfBA I explained in my last post that I wasn't really doing my analysis in any sort of order, just what order my tabs ended up in. I posted what I had because I needed to leave and I wanted to get at least some information out before I went.

Also, to pick who I analyzed, I skimmed the thread and pulled up the filter of anyone who had been suspected of being scum. My method for doing it may not have been the best, but I'm trying to fix that for the rest of my analysis.

Alright tell me right now who you would like lynched. You're clearly here and have been for at least an hour so your analysis should have found something by now.

ProfessorBadass

94 Posts

December 14 2011 00:33 GMT

#624

And I don't want "this guy looks Townie" get down and dirty and paint someone red for me.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

December 14 2011 00:36 GMT

#625

Okay, risk nuke hasn't posted anything concerning why he defended Seth without a legitimate reason, so I am going to change my vote to him.

ProfessorBadass

94 Posts

December 14 2011 00:39 GMT

#626

Clock's ticking!

You don't need to post a big analysis, just tell me who you've found to be scummy Mr. Spaackle.

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

December 14 2011 00:42 GMT

#627

There are 6 people with one vote on them, of we want to have a chance of killing a mafia, we should really focus our efforts on one particular person.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

December 14 2011 00:43 GMT

#628

I thinks it's pretty weird that deadline is in 2 hours and we are missing 12 votes.

@ProfessorBadass What do you think about Refallen?

kitaman27

United States9244 Posts

December 14 2011 00:43 GMT

#629

Breaking News!

Front runner candidate Arctocod has announced their withdrawal from the Day One Election! Tune in at 10 for further election coverage and to witness the daily execution LIVE!

Arctocod is no longer eligible to be elected day one. All votes against them have been nullified (zbot will not reflect the nullified votes). A little over 2 hours remain in the day. Players who do not vote for an eligible candidate will not be modkilled this cycle.

xsksc

United Kingdom1044 Posts

December 14 2011 00:44 GMT

#630

the fuck?

ProfessorBadass

94 Posts

December 14 2011 00:45 GMT

#631

lol what

ProfessorBadass

94 Posts

December 14 2011 00:45 GMT

#632

Palmar what did you do?

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

December 14 2011 00:46 GMT

#633

Rofl. This is a dick move towards europeans.

This also means that nyczbrandon is currently looking to become pardoner.

So we need to decide a lynch and I think Nisani201 looks alright, I'd also be willing to vote for Refallen.

@ProfessorBadass What do you think about Refallen?

GreYMisT

United States6736 Posts

December 14 2011 00:47 GMT

#634

What what the the fuck fuck?

MrZentor

United States1648 Posts

December 14 2011 00:47 GMT

#635

Vote for MrZentor, because he probably isn't mafia!!

Seriously though, the other people with one vote pretty scummy.

We should all vote for one person who is the least likely to be mafia, regardless if he or she ran for office.

It would be nice to be invincible during the night, though. :p