|
he wont be justifying anything anytime soon now
|
|
|
On November 02 2010 07:21 Amber[LighT] wrote:mods just temp ban me. they dont take my shit anymore  im trying not to post elsewhere until this games over so I don't miss 2 day/night cycles because of [European] mods who can't take jokes lollolol
i also find myself not wanting to post anywhere else to avoid getting a temp ban induced modkill
|
well if you cant post for 2 weeks it does.
|
On November 02 2010 07:40 LunarDestiny wrote:Look over day 2 post again. 3 people are infected... The logical reason is mafia targeted someone and that person came in contact with 2 others. I question who that person could be. Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 10:15 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On October 29 2010 10:07 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Does the person with murrayitis know they have murrayitis? With the exception of any doctor role, players will not be informed if they have murrayitis. As of now, no one claims to have the disease so I assume that no doctor has the disease. If DrH is telling the truth about his poking ability and his doctor role. He couldn't have the disease and the disease never transferred to another person. Then who the mafia targeted with the disease and who the disease spread to. We have to figure this out soon or the game will end at an exponential rate. My guess is that it's someone who stood out in day1 excluding DrH.
fishball because he has contact with a circle would be the most logical assumption
|
|
|
On November 02 2010 12:48 Beneather wrote:
That was a very confusing post right there. From what evidence did you have that DocH and what was the point of saying that if you die DocH was a scum. The part that I do not understand in your post is that your changing your mind. That you do not want to be killed so you may be a scum for "trying to frame DocH" But as you notice that DocH may not be killed since the topic has changed on to different suspects you have changed your mind because you wanted DocH to be killed. This may be the evidence that you are a scum.
Sorry if this did not make sense its my first time!
huh? can you word this better?
|
On November 02 2010 13:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2010 12:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On November 02 2010 12:47 jcarlsoniv wrote:On November 02 2010 12:09 Pandain wrote:
oh wtf, im almost at 2000?
screw the part1/2/3/4/5 crud. I'm a do a full blown analysis.
Don't expect me to post for a while :p I won't lie to you, I probably won't even bother reading it. I already know what it will say. On November 02 2010 12:14 infinitestory wrote:On November 02 2010 12:10 L wrote:On November 02 2010 11:44 infinitestory wrote:On November 02 2010 11:40 L wrote:On November 02 2010 11:18 NB wrote:
hmm, i wana have you guys opinion on this: so Node said DCLXVI will die tonight!
we also lost our 1 and only bodyguard!
who should the medic protect night2? mayor or DCLXVI assuming we only have 1 medic?.... Uh, so, that's... a town mediated hit? Mafia doesn't send in their hits during the day unless they have a dayvig, and if they had a Dayvig, they could just shoot just prior to the vote close to fuck over Node/Medic reactions. So Node's probably not detecting dayvigs. Did I miss something day 1? I'm pretty sure I did. At the very end of Night 1, Node claimed that he knew BrownBear was going to die. He then claimed that his role was "oracle," which allowed him to see at the beginning of each day one player who's slated to die that night. DCLXVI is, according to Node, slated to die tonight. Possible connections between Node's role and the +1 part of mafia's 2+1 KP have been brought up. One suggestion in particular says that there's a red with the role of killing one guy randomly each night, and Node gets to find out who that is at the start of the day. The possibility of Node being a red baiting medics has also been brought up. The +1 makes sense, but that means that mafia would have had to.. hmm. Node, when did you recieve the two PMs notifying you who's going to die? Like I said, he claims it's at the beginning of the day each day. He also claims that he received QuickStriker's name at the beginning of Day 1, but QuickStriker was modkilled at the end of Day 1, so he then received BrownBear's name. I have known this for quite a while, but it just got me thinking: What do you think the odds are that the mods would change the "oracled" target if that target was modkilled? Idk, it just seems to me that if the player was modkilled, well that's tough shit for the oracle, his power is wasted for the day. Thinking about this, Node actually does seem pretty fishy. Eye of Suspicion That's just speculation. Node seems to think there is a predetermined list and that if a player os modkilled a new target is chosen. Or there is a mafia killing role that must decide on a kill ahead of time (Decide 1 kill in the day + 2 kills at night) and node is aware of the day choice there are many possibilities here, I don't think we can draw any serious conclusions from. obviously due to the gravity of his roleclaim his posting can not be ignored. Haha fair enough. I just wanted to put Eye of Suspicion on someone... I was gonna on Lexpar, but he posted and placated me. It scares me that we haven't heard from Divinek...
so your basically saying that your just trying to accuse people for the sake of accusing people?
really?
thats as anti town as it gets.
|
On November 02 2010 13:10 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2010 13:05 Coagulation wrote:On November 02 2010 13:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:On November 02 2010 12:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On November 02 2010 12:47 jcarlsoniv wrote:On November 02 2010 12:09 Pandain wrote:
oh wtf, im almost at 2000?
screw the part1/2/3/4/5 crud. I'm a do a full blown analysis.
Don't expect me to post for a while :p I won't lie to you, I probably won't even bother reading it. I already know what it will say. On November 02 2010 12:14 infinitestory wrote:On November 02 2010 12:10 L wrote:On November 02 2010 11:44 infinitestory wrote:On November 02 2010 11:40 L wrote:On November 02 2010 11:18 NB wrote:
hmm, i wana have you guys opinion on this: so Node said DCLXVI will die tonight!
we also lost our 1 and only bodyguard!
who should the medic protect night2? mayor or DCLXVI assuming we only have 1 medic?.... Uh, so, that's... a town mediated hit? Mafia doesn't send in their hits during the day unless they have a dayvig, and if they had a Dayvig, they could just shoot just prior to the vote close to fuck over Node/Medic reactions. So Node's probably not detecting dayvigs. Did I miss something day 1? I'm pretty sure I did. At the very end of Night 1, Node claimed that he knew BrownBear was going to die. He then claimed that his role was "oracle," which allowed him to see at the beginning of each day one player who's slated to die that night. DCLXVI is, according to Node, slated to die tonight. Possible connections between Node's role and the +1 part of mafia's 2+1 KP have been brought up. One suggestion in particular says that there's a red with the role of killing one guy randomly each night, and Node gets to find out who that is at the start of the day. The possibility of Node being a red baiting medics has also been brought up. The +1 makes sense, but that means that mafia would have had to.. hmm. Node, when did you recieve the two PMs notifying you who's going to die? Like I said, he claims it's at the beginning of the day each day. He also claims that he received QuickStriker's name at the beginning of Day 1, but QuickStriker was modkilled at the end of Day 1, so he then received BrownBear's name. I have known this for quite a while, but it just got me thinking: What do you think the odds are that the mods would change the "oracled" target if that target was modkilled? Idk, it just seems to me that if the player was modkilled, well that's tough shit for the oracle, his power is wasted for the day. Thinking about this, Node actually does seem pretty fishy. Eye of Suspicion That's just speculation. Node seems to think there is a predetermined list and that if a player os modkilled a new target is chosen. Or there is a mafia killing role that must decide on a kill ahead of time (Decide 1 kill in the day + 2 kills at night) and node is aware of the day choice there are many possibilities here, I don't think we can draw any serious conclusions from. obviously due to the gravity of his roleclaim his posting can not be ignored. Haha fair enough. I just wanted to put Eye of Suspicion on someone... I was gonna on Lexpar, but he posted and placated me. It scares me that we haven't heard from Divinek... so your basically saying that your just trying to accuse people for the sake of accusing people? really? thats as anti town as it gets. Was I accusing him? No. I felt left out because of all this ridiculous arguing, and I want people to look at others for possible lynch targets because I believe this argument really didn't get us far. Go ahead and try to paint me anti-town if you really want to. I'm not sure you'll get too far.
im not trying to paint you anti town. but dont pretend that trying to put eye of suspicion on people because you feel left out is a good way to help town.
|
|
|
On November 02 2010 13:52 Veldril wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2010 05:19 Glasse wrote:
I think veldril might be scared of saying anything due to what happened in haunted mafia
I'd love to hear him on this though I try to post something but having fever and playing Mafia make my head hurts even more T T Regarding Dr.H and jcarlson, I think there are too many possibilities to simply conclude anything. I still 80% certain that Dr.H is a town player. However, he needs to prove his role quickly or he will lose the trust from me. On Aeres, I really have no comments at this point (can't have good thinking right now T T). But I would not vote for him simply because of LAL. But I admit that young, and Dr.H made a good analysis on him. I will put my vote on Divinek for the time being. He's a vet and I want him to say something too. I have yet to see his post about current situation. Also, last game he barely posted and turn out to be red in the end so I think we need to force him to be more active this game too.
Well as far as confirming DR.H theres a good chance this may not happen. I think its in the towns best interest to accept that and try to move in a more productive direction with our scum hunting.
as far as voting aeres so far he is the only one that has a strong case against him so im inclined to put my vote on him. even more so considering that after doch started pushing for us to lynch aeres the youngminni bandwagon popped up out of nowhere with seemingly little pressure to vote on him.
now i see alot of people who havnt voted yet. i feel like mafia is reserving their numbers to lynch youngminni over aeres at the last second.
hope your feeling better soon
|
On November 02 2010 20:32 Glasse wrote:
BLAARH BLAHBLAH BLARBBLAB LBLABLARBLAR
BLAHBLAH BLERP BLA BLARPLRAPRLBALERRR
|
it was an analysis of his post history.
|
adding "glasse is a blue" to the day post doesn't prove it.
|
On November 02 2010 21:30 Glasse wrote:
Why would a red be able to post a small message on the day post?
Was that a slip? or more bullshit?
|
well i hope all you LAL supporters are patting yourselves on the back.
|
On November 03 2010 08:15 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 08:13 LunarDestiny wrote:
Fishball's PM network is NOT now dead
You guys can talk in encrypted messages using "Fishball's last PM network message" as the encryption code. Or you guys might not want to expose yourself as being in the circle. Yes but the mod stated: "Players in it may no longer PM eachother.", so they could, but it would be against the rules.
hes saying talk in code in the thread and use the last pm fish sent as the decoder
|
On November 03 2010 08:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:can i take the time to say that divineks only contentful posts in this thread were attempts to discredit my campaign/make me look bad? Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 09:49 Divinek wrote:On October 30 2010 09:45 Infundibulum wrote:
Also anybody running on the platform of "I will roleclaim if I am Mayor" needs to reconsider their platform in light of the fact that the mayor can be rolechecked.
Additionally, Artanis alluded to the possible existence of elements that can tamper with role check results - e.g. a framer or insane DT - meaning that a rolecheck on the mayor night 1 is possibly useless, as any rolecheck-tampering would almost certainly be directed the mayors' way.
Finally, remember confirming a players role ability != confirming a players alignment. i think it's beyond silly to say they can be assuredly confirmed in any way. There is got to be a high chance of having some kind of framer role, and what better choice than a mayor that's trying to say hey guyz i can be verified Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 09:53 Divinek wrote:On October 30 2010 09:46 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 30 2010 09:45 Infundibulum wrote:
Also anybody running on the platform of "I will roleclaim if I am Mayor" needs to reconsider their platform in light of the fact that the mayor can be rolechecked.
Additionally, Artanis alluded to the possible existence of elements that can tamper with role check results - e.g. a framer or insane DT - meaning that a rolecheck on the mayor night 1 is possibly useless, as any rolecheck-tampering would almost certainly be directed the mayors' way.
Finally, remember confirming a players role ability != confirming a players alignment. I can prove my role is what I say it is without having to be rolechecked and if anyone tries to fake a rolecheck on me they'll be incriminated when I prove them otherwise. I can't fathom any way you can do this that doesn't involve the possibility of you just getting your mafia buddies to help you do whatever it is you say you can do I dont like the idea of just picking someone for what they say they are able to be or capable of. I'm more inclined to go with someone who has shown they can actually be useful instead of spewing confirmability. Whatever it is you say you can do to confirm yourself i have no doubt the host put in something to make it possible to compromise the integrity of your claim. It's silly that you could try to be concrete on something so unknown to anyone. I would rather have someone leading with clearly good intentions and capable of doing something instead of saying well guys i can be confirmed, cause once someone gets elected the spot lights so heavy it's ridiculous anyway can i also note he's making some of the exact same arguments pandain is making now?
there isnt a person in this game who isnt suspicious of you.
|
no im saying your gonna lynch a whole lot of blues if your gonna start basing who you are suspicious of based on who doesn't trust you
|
also im wondering exactly how many blues are you allowed to lynch before its justifiable for us to question you?
is there a number?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
