| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:05 MooMooMugi wrote: Dominate refuses to jungle in soloQ for some reason, and hes so bad at top its not even funny Curiously..... Is he good at all? My most memorable moment of IWD is his Alistar during OGN Champion Summer.... he camped the bottom lane for like 3 minutes only to fail the QW combo. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:09 Requizen wrote: Scarra really pushing that Ori. She just seems so finnicky, not really straight up strong like Ahri or even Annie, only shines in certain situations. Maybe it's just me. Orianna is so annoying though. Unlike some other skillshot champions, Orianna has a shield that also gives MR, and just in case she missed her skillshots she can still auto you. I really dislike laning against Orianna. Luckily I don't see too many... I guess people around my skill level are too nub to realize how broken she is  | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:08 Sufficiency wrote: Curiously..... Is he good at all? My most memorable moment of IWD is his Alistar during OGN Champion Summer.... he camped the bottom lane for like 3 minutes only to fail the QW combo. He looked promising when he first joined Dignitas when Jatt left but after the first few tournaments with Dignitas only placing in top 5, top 3, in tournaments and never winning anything, its clear that the junglers from every other team does a better job than IWD does and then some. I really liked Jatt more than IWD and I felt he fit into/led the team much better than he does now | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11519 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:09 MooMooMugi wrote: Because 50% of LoL playerbase doesn't' play ranked, has no interest in playing ranked, hates playing ranked? I'm sure there are a few talented unranked players who only play normals I am pretty sure that those don't count in that statistic. If i understand correctly, the average of LoL elo is at 1200, which, if the system works correctly, would mean that half of the people who play ranked are below 1200. The crazy part is when you notice that you are gold or platinum, and that means you are in the top 1-3%. Which makes no sense whatsoever considering just how bad i am. I think the lesson one should take out of this is just that it is hard to overestimate just how bad the average LoL player is. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:19 Simberto wrote: I am pretty sure that those don't count in that statistic. If i understand correctly, the average of LoL elo is at 1200, which, if the system works correctly, would mean that half of the people who play ranked are below 1200. The crazy part is when you notice that you are gold or platinum, and that means you are in the top 1-3%. Which makes no sense whatsoever considering just how bad i am. I think the lesson one should take out of this is just that it is hard to overestimate just how bad the average LoL player is. This is not just the case in LoL. In SC2, too, I've been able to reach plat even though my macro is terrible, my APM is 20-30 and I don't have builds, I just wing it every game. From how I viewed myself playing SC, I should have been bronze, but I underestimated the amount of bad that is present in the majority of people. Ppl so bad | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:19 Simberto wrote: I am pretty sure that those don't count in that statistic. If i understand correctly, the average of LoL elo is at 1200, which, if the system works correctly, would mean that half of the people who play ranked are below 1200. The crazy part is when you notice that you are gold or platinum, and that means you are in the top 1-3%. Which makes no sense whatsoever considering just how bad i am. I think the lesson one should take out of this is just that it is hard to overestimate just how bad the average LoL player is. Let me break it down for you: the ENTIRE LoL playerbase that play ranked: Mystery, I'm guessing around 40-50% of that 40-50%, only 50% are actually 1250 or higher(which is old "bronze", now silver is 1150), rest of 50% are sub <1250 which is unranked This information is outdated because you are given a bronze medal all the way down to 850 I believe Now these are the % of ONLY RANKED players Silver is top 20-25% Gold is top 5-10% Plat is top 1-2% Diamond is top 0.01% Again, these stats are OUTDATED, the new tiers for medals made every tier so much lower before, especially for the lower tiers Bronze(1250, or "old bronze") is top 60-70%, Silver is probably top 30-40%, Gold top 10-5%, Plat top 2-2.5% Edit: There are currently 351,086 "ranked" players according to the official soloQ ladder, which starts at 1200 which is AUTOMATICALLY silver | ||
|
Shivaz
Canada1783 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:19 Simberto wrote: I am pretty sure that those don't count in that statistic. If i understand correctly, the average of LoL elo is at 1200, which, if the system works correctly, would mean that half of the people who play ranked are below 1200. The crazy part is when you notice that you are gold or platinum, and that means you are in the top 1-3%. Which makes no sense whatsoever considering just how bad i am. I think the lesson one should take out of this is just that it is hard to overestimate just how bad the average LoL player is. Top 1-3% of all players higher than 1200 elo is the stat. I remember someone on reddit collected the data of players above 1200 elo. I am pretty terrible at this game and I am 1800 elo which is top 2% of all players above 1200 elo, thus if you account people below 1200 and people that dont play ranked yeah.. so what you said about the average LoL player. edit: here is the data, about 1 month old now http://i.imgur.com/OGWi6.png | ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11519 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:29 MooMooMugi wrote: Let me break it down for you: the ENTIRE LoL playerbase that play ranked: Mystery, I'm guessing around 40-50% of that 40-50%, only 50% are actually 1250 or higher(which is old "bronze"), rest of 50% are sub <1250 which is unranked This information is outdated because you are given a bronze medal all the way down to 850 I believe Now these are the % of ONLY RANKED players Silver is top 20-25% Gold is top 5-10% Plat is top 1-2% Diamond is top 0.01% Again, these stats are OUTDATED, the new tiers for medals made every tier so much lower before, especially for the lower tiers Bronze is top 60-70%, Silver is probably top 30-40%, Gold top 10-20%, Plat top 5% I just looked at what the lol wiki says here. I don't know where they got their data, though, so i don't know how much one can believe them. They state that gold in the season 2 system is top 5-10%, and plat top 0.5-1% of all the people playing ranked. | ||
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:09 MooMooMugi wrote: Because 50% of LoL playerbase doesn't' play ranked, has no interest in playing ranked, hates playing ranked? I'm sure there are a few talented unranked players who only play normals EgoIgnaxio is a pretty good example. He soared really high once he started playing ranked to shut up everyone who said he was bad because he only plays Normals. He got to 2k ELO in two to three weeks iirc. | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:38 Simberto wrote: I just looked at what the lol wiki says here. I don't know where they got their data, though, so i don't know how much one can believe them. They state that gold in the season 2 system is top 5-10%, and plat top 0.5-1% of all the people playing ranked. Their stats seem to be correct, they prob grabbed them from the official Lol site like I did | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11519 Posts
| ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:06 BlackPaladin wrote: Is it sad that I don't even play at all anymore, never was any good, and yet I'm higher than over 50% of the playerbase....? :/ I....I don't even know how that's possible. You have to realize that LoL is HUGE so casuals who have either never played video games or come from console games are playing. I have some RL friends that played Xbox Live casually who have no idea how to even control their mouse and keyboard. It's no surprise that if you have experience playing on the PC you'll be better than those who don't. | ||
|
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
| ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
On October 19 2012 11:38 overt wrote: EgoIgnaxio is a pretty good example. He soared really high once he started playing ranked to shut up everyone who said he was bad because he only plays Normals. He got to 2k ELO in two to three weeks iirc. For every sleeper 2k elo normals only player, there could be 999 other pretty terrible normals only players. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
OSC
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
PiGosaur Monday
Afreeca Starleague
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
