|
i love how riot doesnt give two shits the guy dropped 300$ on the game.
|
On December 18 2010 20:04 HeavOnEarth wrote:i love how riot doesnt give two shits the guy dropped 300$ on the game.
He supposedly had a lot of reports and would rage then go afk in games sometimes.
|
On December 18 2010 20:03 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 13:16 oberon wrote: Leblanc's most mana efficient spell for damage at level 1? Unless you start out with over 58 AP, it's W. That's right, the spell with the ridiculous anti-gank utility and AoE damage also has the most flat damage and most damage/mana efficiency. Taking E is justifiable if you're doing a multi-person gank or level 1 teamfight, but if you ever take Q at level 1 on Leblanc, you're simply dumb.
(If you're curious, the optimal mana-efficiency skill build for her up to 6 is WQQWQR.)
It seems like some of W's damage should be moved to Q or E (or some of their mana costs moved to W). Am I crazy? W's cooldown is really lame, though, and it makes you vulnerable. Also, E enables you to hit one more Q, but yeah I really would prefer her Q to be as strong as Kassadin's. As it is, you even lose to a Malphite...
losing to malphite isnt exactly abnormal
|
On December 18 2010 20:47 barbsq wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 20:03 Shikyo wrote:On December 18 2010 13:16 oberon wrote: Leblanc's most mana efficient spell for damage at level 1? Unless you start out with over 58 AP, it's W. That's right, the spell with the ridiculous anti-gank utility and AoE damage also has the most flat damage and most damage/mana efficiency. Taking E is justifiable if you're doing a multi-person gank or level 1 teamfight, but if you ever take Q at level 1 on Leblanc, you're simply dumb.
(If you're curious, the optimal mana-efficiency skill build for her up to 6 is WQQWQR.)
It seems like some of W's damage should be moved to Q or E (or some of their mana costs moved to W). Am I crazy? W's cooldown is really lame, though, and it makes you vulnerable. Also, E enables you to hit one more Q, but yeah I really would prefer her Q to be as strong as Kassadin's. As it is, you even lose to a Malphite... losing to malphite isnt exactly abnormal It is when your champion 10000000000% relies on completely dominating her 1v1 in order to be somewhat useful in the game.
On December 18 2010 20:31 BlackPaladin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 20:04 HeavOnEarth wrote:i love how riot doesnt give two shits the guy dropped 300$ on the game. He supposedly had a lot of reports and would rage then go afk in games sometimes. He said he'd have stopped that if they had warned him in some way. I really don't understand why they wouldn't send a warning instead of insta-permaing a person who's spent 300$. He's still going to play under a new account and won't spend any more money on the game, but would most likely have otherwise. First offense should never be perma unless it's hacking or something.
|
When they ban people they don't look at financials. It isn't a consideration. It isn't even allowed even if the banned brings it up to make it a consideration.
|
On December 18 2010 21:32 ghen wrote: When they ban people they don't look at financials. It isn't a consideration. It isn't even allowed even if the banned brings it up to make it a consideration.
This. I've worked as essentially a customer support role for a game company for...mmm, 3 years. You're given rules you have to enforce and money spent isn't a consideration at all when it comes to banning people (or unbanning for that matter). Spending money doesn't mean "I can do what I want now because I'm a paying customer."
|
On December 18 2010 20:04 HeavOnEarth wrote:i love how riot doesnt give two shits the guy dropped 300$ on the game. $300 to them is pocket change lol
|
Runes, skillbuild and jungle path for jungle mundo anyone?
|
hmm... that one's kinda hard. I'd probably still take 1/8/21 and go smite/ghost with cloth + 5 pots into HoG. After that you really deviate, spirit visage/randuins/sunfire/banshees etc based on situation.
|
Would it be worthwhile to explore tanky Leblanc to abuse her single-target 4.4second root?
|
|
|
On December 18 2010 23:16 Juicyfruit wrote: Would it be worthwhile to explore tanky Leblanc to abuse her single-target 4.4second root?
that is with ultimate, malphite can do that job better.
|
Oh yeah, that's right, 9/0/21, not 1/8/21 lol.
|
I actually like running 9/12/9 because taking less minion damage is very nice on Mundo (and most other melee-attacky types). More offense points works - your choice between aspd & armor pen or CDR and mpen - and more defense points works though you should stop after 4 Veteran's Scars. The big problem with defense tree on mundo is you either get 1% dodge (whee) and 4 mres or 2% and nimbleness, both a waste of points unless you run dodge runes/buy ninja tabi (which is good in some circumstances imoimoimo). Weird mastery setups are good on mundo :o There's also 1/14/15 if you want movespeed. The biggest benefit of 9/0/21 is having your ult up 6 seconds faster in my opinion. And ghost and smite/exhaust/cleanse. Offense tree is really quite helpful on Mundo, to the point where I could legitimately see 21/0/9 on him. Lucky crit at level 2 for 250 damage!
|
On December 18 2010 20:58 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 20:47 barbsq wrote:On December 18 2010 20:03 Shikyo wrote:On December 18 2010 13:16 oberon wrote: Leblanc's most mana efficient spell for damage at level 1? Unless you start out with over 58 AP, it's W. That's right, the spell with the ridiculous anti-gank utility and AoE damage also has the most flat damage and most damage/mana efficiency. Taking E is justifiable if you're doing a multi-person gank or level 1 teamfight, but if you ever take Q at level 1 on Leblanc, you're simply dumb.
(If you're curious, the optimal mana-efficiency skill build for her up to 6 is WQQWQR.)
It seems like some of W's damage should be moved to Q or E (or some of their mana costs moved to W). Am I crazy? W's cooldown is really lame, though, and it makes you vulnerable. Also, E enables you to hit one more Q, but yeah I really would prefer her Q to be as strong as Kassadin's. As it is, you even lose to a Malphite... losing to malphite isnt exactly abnormal It is when your champion 10000000000% relies on completely dominating her 1v1 in order to be somewhat useful in the game. Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 20:31 BlackPaladin wrote:On December 18 2010 20:04 HeavOnEarth wrote:i love how riot doesnt give two shits the guy dropped 300$ on the game. He supposedly had a lot of reports and would rage then go afk in games sometimes. He said he'd have stopped that if they had warned him in some way. I really don't understand why they wouldn't send a warning instead of insta-permaing a person who's spent 300$. He's still going to play under a new account and won't spend any more money on the game, but would most likely have otherwise. First offense should never be perma unless it's hacking or something.
Well, the only evidence that we had that he didn't recive a warning was his original post, and judging by the overall veracity of that, I wouldn't be suprisied if it was ALL lies.
|
On December 19 2010 01:05 LaNague wrote:Show nested quote +On December 18 2010 23:16 Juicyfruit wrote: Would it be worthwhile to explore tanky Leblanc to abuse her single-target 4.4second root? that is with ultimate, malphite can do that job better.
Yeah but does malphite have boobs?
DIDN'T THINK SO.
Just because tank leblanc isn't viable at top tier doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun at TapiocaTier
|
On December 19 2010 04:36 ghen wrote:Show nested quote +On December 19 2010 01:05 LaNague wrote:On December 18 2010 23:16 Juicyfruit wrote: Would it be worthwhile to explore tanky Leblanc to abuse her single-target 4.4second root? that is with ultimate, malphite can do that job better. Yeah but does malphite have boobs? DIDN'T THINK SO. Just because tank leblanc isn't viable at top tier doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun at TapiocaTier  i dont think leblanc has boobs either true story
|
"The user LoCicero has requested to add you to his or her friends list to see your presence online" wtf you trollin me? nm just looked at your match history. 2-5 loss with Nasus. It is now clear to me that you need my help.
|
On December 19 2010 05:26 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On December 19 2010 04:36 ghen wrote:On December 19 2010 01:05 LaNague wrote:On December 18 2010 23:16 Juicyfruit wrote: Would it be worthwhile to explore tanky Leblanc to abuse her single-target 4.4second root? that is with ultimate, malphite can do that job better. Yeah but does malphite have boobs? DIDN'T THINK SO. Just because tank leblanc isn't viable at top tier doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun at TapiocaTier  i dont think leblanc has boobs either true story
Clearly you haven't explored tanky leblanc!
|
|
|
|