EPTOn July 30 2009 10:31 CrownRoyal wrote:
$30 for jeans is a joke unless you're eating ramen for dinner.
$30 for jeans is a joke unless you're eating ramen for dinner.
LOL.... You're views on clothes and status are very convoluted.
[R] Pic of Very Expensive Jacket - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Hiphopapotamus
United States121 Posts
LOL.... You're views on clothes and status are very convoluted. | ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
Pacifist
Israel1683 Posts
| ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
On July 30 2009 10:58 Hiphopapotamus wrote: LOL.... You're views on clothes and status are very convoluted. so is your view on spelling (if you're going to put in the effort to exclusively type "you're" for "your" and vice versa, you'd think people would grasp their meanings before they repeatedly abuse either.) | ||
|
Draconizard
628 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On July 30 2009 02:36 PJA wrote: My $150 leather jacket will outlast that piece of shit by at least 10 years, and that's without me taking good care of it at all. Haha, not at all. Ferragamo is quality stuff. Their shoes last for fucking ever too. $500 a pair though. By the way, guys, just as a thought... women can tell the difference between $2 jeans and $200 jeans. Having expensive clothes is a DHV, and a good one. And the women that can tell the difference are the hot ones, normally. I know everyone's preference in women is different, but there is good reason to spend a lot on clothes. | ||
|
PanoRaMa
United States5070 Posts
On July 30 2009 11:59 Draconizard wrote: He did not commit a spelling error but rather one of diction. He knows perfectly well how to spell the words, just not which one to use. yeah so take that, paper!!! | ||
|
Hiphopapotamus
United States121 Posts
On July 30 2009 11:50 paper wrote: so is your view on spelling (if you're going to put in the effort to exclusively type "you're" for "your" and vice versa, you'd think people would grasp their meanings before they repeatedly abuse either.) Yes, generalize my grammar knowledge based off of a single careless mistake. Are you really so smug? | ||
|
TheMusiC
United States1054 Posts
On July 30 2009 11:59 Draconizard wrote: He did not commit a spelling error but rather one of diction. He knows perfectly well how to spell the words, just not which one to use. hahahah fucking awesome On July 30 2009 12:34 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: Haha, not at all. Ferragamo is quality stuff. Their shoes last for fucking ever too. $500 a pair though. By the way, guys, just as a thought... women can tell the difference between $2 jeans and $200 jeans. Having expensive clothes is a DHV, and a good one. And the women that can tell the difference are the hot ones, normally. I know everyone's preference in women is different, but there is good reason to spend a lot on clothes. this. plus, $200+ jeans generally feel a whole lot different from the shit you buy at the gap, although the gap is actually pretty decent for what it is. and while brands like ed hardy and christian audigier automatically scream "douchebag" to most people, women love it. | ||
|
BalliSLife
1339 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On July 30 2009 12:59 TheMusiC wrote: hahahah fucking awesome this. plus, $200+ jeans generally feel a whole lot different from the shit you buy at the gap, although the gap is actually pretty decent for what it is. and while brands like ed hardy and christian audigier automatically scream "douchebag" to most people, women love it. Yeah, you don't have to buy Ed Hardy though, there are tons of brands that are better. And if you know where to look you can get them for significantly less than full price. But absolutely there is a difference in quality. My 7 for all Mankind jeans feel a LOT better than the $30 jeans I bought at Pacsun, or the slightly more expensive ones from express. On July 30 2009 13:04 BalliSLife wrote: the stuck up girls in Vancouver love true religion and rock and republics! all around 300 dollars. But those jeans (especially rocks) are pretty fukin dope Those are awesome jeans. | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
On July 30 2009 11:59 Draconizard wrote: He did not commit a spelling error but rather one of diction. He knows perfectly well how to spell the words, just not which one to use. considering how clear-cut either word's use in the english language is, i wouldn't be so sure he knows how to spell. diction -- style of speaking or writing as dependent upon choice of words the issue isn't style at all rofl On July 30 2009 12:50 Hiphopapotamus wrote: Yes, generalize my grammar knowledge based off of a single careless mistake. Are you really so smug? yes, generalize people's life based off a single article of clothing. Are you really so smug to brush off all excess materialism beyond your own materialistic consumption? | ||
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
sweetlemons i love you but please! commercialized trash != good denim i've done the r+r / diesel thing too but there are much better ways to spend hundreds of $ on a pair of jeans. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On July 30 2009 13:20 Last Romantic wrote: lol sevens sweetlemons i love you but please! commercialized trash != good denim i've done the r+r / diesel thing too but there are much better ways to spend hundreds of $ on a pair of jeans. Hey I like it, but if you've got better stuff, tell me. I didn't pay for those anyway, and I got them a few years ago. | ||
|
TheMusiC
United States1054 Posts
| ||
|
TheMusiC
United States1054 Posts
On July 30 2009 13:44 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: Hey I like it, but if you've got better stuff, tell me. I didn't pay for those anyway, and I got them a few years ago. check out nudies, imperials, kicking mule workshop, 45rpm, paper cloth and denim, flat head, pure blue japan, samurai... that should get you started | ||
|
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
On July 30 2009 13:44 TheMusiC wrote: women love da sevens/R&R and TR's ;p unfortunately. @lemons, i find the make/construction of my imperials to be superior to that of my other jeans. i am convinced that if it is denim you are looking for, imported japanese selvedge cannot be topped. however, i am similarly convinced that most girls are ignorant and will go for the known brands even if they're .... bad. so that point must, sadly, be conceded. | ||
|
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
On July 30 2009 13:47 TheMusiC wrote: check out nudies, imperials, kicking mule workshop, 45rpm, paper cloth and denim, flat head, pure blue japan, samurai... that should get you started +evisuuuu | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
On July 30 2009 13:44 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: Hey I like it, but if you've got better stuff, tell me. I didn't pay for those anyway, and I got them a few years ago. http://www.superfuture.com/supertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=15 o_o;;; check out how people's jeans evolve: http://www.superfuture.com/supertalk/showthread.php?t=3526 | ||
|
TheMusiC
United States1054 Posts
and yes, if you don't really care about the quality of your denim and only care about the look/style then just stick with the standard sevens/true religions. denim-wise they'll never be as good as the japanese selvege you can get, but shit like apc's and kmw's generally don't really have a distinct look to them like your R&R's or true religions do... nudies and imperials are sexy as hell though | ||
| ||
