130+ = 2.1% of population
145+ = 0.1% of population
the test is supposed to be standardized that way at least
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
azndsh
United States4447 Posts
130+ = 2.1% of population 145+ = 0.1% of population the test is supposed to be standardized that way at least | ||
|
Aphelion
United States2720 Posts
On May 07 2007 23:36 IIICodeIIIIIII wrote: Show nested quote + On May 07 2007 23:33 Aphelion02 wrote: Dude. Skip the monkey business and just start using humans. Take a bunch of high IQ humans in the 150 range, and start breeding. When monkeys get to that level they will have the same sentience and understanding anyways, so the morality is the same. Humans are just a lot easier to train, breed, communicate with, and the process would be faster as the base IQ is so high. And for those that don't make the cut we can just use them for food, like Jonathan Swift suggested. Just make sure that experimental humans are marked early on with birth, such as a number tattoo or a Star of David. more ethical issues involved with humans -_-. if i had to breed humans, i'd breed for attractiveness and cup size, and the INVERSE of intelligence. oh, and wtf. how come the human race has been breeding for hot women for thousands of years, and we still got fucking trolls wandering around!? I contend the morality issues involved are the same once you get a Monkey with an IQ or 120 and are making him do human work. Exactly the same. | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
Polemarch
Canada1564 Posts
On May 07 2007 23:36 IIICodeIIIIIII wrote: oh, and wtf. how come the human race has been breeding for hot women for thousands of years, and we still got fucking trolls wandering around!? I forget my source, but I remember coming across something somewhat reputable speculating (with some backing) that humans these days are way more attractive than in prehistoric times based on some semi-objective measures of attractiveness like waist-hip ratio and symmetry. It may have been either The Blank Slate or How The Mind Works by Steven Pinker. Plus, attractiveness is mostly relative. There will always be people well below average. If you're surrounded by hotties all the time your standards will go up. Or some of my friends in engineering talk about this effect in reverse... (Yes, I know you're mostly joking) | ||
|
Luddite
United States2315 Posts
| ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
On May 07 2007 23:48 Luddite wrote: Hmm. A plan to create massive horde of super intelligent apes breeding as fast as possible then work them as slaves. I don't see how that plan could possibly fail. I think the animal beats us on that since now we have to build places just to take care of them. Even fighting for their rights and stuff. | ||
|
IIICodeIIIIIII
China1101 Posts
Poll: What would I prefer as a pet (Vote): 200 generations bred super hot chick to be my pillow/bed/@!#$/slave (Vote): 200 generations bred 160 IQ monkey to do my homework/job/brain/slave (Vote): inhumane. it's inhuman. I dream of matha stewart | ||
|
Luddite
United States2315 Posts
| ||
|
zdd
1463 Posts
| ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
the ultimate sc player!! | ||
|
IIICodeIIIIIII
China1101 Posts
On May 07 2007 23:40 azndsh wrote: 115+ = 13.6% of population 130+ = 2.1% of population 145+ = 0.1% of population the test is supposed to be standardized that way at least here's a nice table i found. ![]() standard deviation means that 68% of people fall within the mean +/- one SD 96% of people fall within the mean +/- two SD 99.8% of people fall within the mean +/- three SD This means that you were in Italy, 4% of people will have IQ more than 160 or less than 160, which means that 2% will have IQ more than 160, or 1 out of 50. That means that out of your standard quiz section in college, there is probably either someone with IQ 160, or someone with 40. cool! | ||
|
Aphelion
United States2720 Posts
| ||
|
Locked
United States4182 Posts
On May 08 2007 00:02 IIICodeIIIIIII wrote: Show nested quote + On May 07 2007 23:40 azndsh wrote: 115+ = 13.6% of population 130+ = 2.1% of population 145+ = 0.1% of population the test is supposed to be standardized that way at least here's a nice table i found. ![]() standard deviation means that 68% of people fall within the mean +/- one SD 96% of people fall within the mean +/- two SD 99.8% of people fall within the mean +/- three SD This means that you were in Italy, 4% of people will have IQ more than 160 or less than 160, which means that 2% will have IQ more than 160, or 1 out of 50. That means that out of your standard quiz section in college, there is probably either someone with IQ 160, or someone with 40. cool! lol if you have an IQ of 40 you're struggling with just staying alive (not an exaggeration) edit: and this idea is stupid | ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
| ||
|
OverTheUnder
United States2929 Posts
| ||
|
lil.sis
China4650 Posts
On May 07 2007 23:36 IIICodeIIIIIII wrote: oh, and wtf. how come the human race has been breeding for hot women for thousands of years, and we still got fucking trolls wandering around!? cuz beer | ||
|
mistapooh
United States376 Posts
| ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5299 Posts
you can olny raise an ape iq artificially, it will only work for it allone. when the apes dies so does your hopes for iq inheritage; people are born with a posibility of an iq range from 40 to 160+, the monkeys do not. | ||
|
defenestrate
United States579 Posts
Then again, Ma Jae Yoon would use them to take over the world. Maybe not such a good idea. | ||
|
KaasZerg
Netherlands927 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
SHIN vs Rogue
ByuN vs Solar
MaxPax vs TBD
herO vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
IPSL
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
SOOP
soO vs FanTaSy
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
GSL
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
KCM Race Survival
RSL Revival
BSL
eOnzErG vs StRyKeR
Cross vs JDConan
|
|
|